Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1001. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Dexter307 wrote: It only seems to do this when standing still. If you move at all you can notice there is much more spread. The is no spread. If you are talking about the huge circle, it doesn't a...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.14 06:31:00
|
1002. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: It only seems to do this when standing still. If you move at all you can notice there is much more spread. The is no spread. If you are talking about the huge circle, it doesn't actually matter. The circle is a lie. The bul...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.14 06:25:00
|
1003. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
HowDidThatTaste wrote: So it seems most agree that this is not working as intended. Now if only we can get some confirmation from CCP The thing is that based on the description it i working as intended by CCP. The problem Is that it's not w...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.14 06:17:00
|
1004. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: with an in your face optimal that people can just bunny hop and strafe I'm not sure you're reading your own results correctly there, Ghaz. 30m optimal isn't that horrible compared to AR's 38m...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 17:57:00
|
1005. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Laurent Cazaderon wrote: Kovinis Sparagas wrote: How did you did that test???!! how can a friend go to enemy side? I want to test more, but CCP mechanics doesn't allow me to do it probably a friendly PC game. or a FW games with mostly fr...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 10:34:00
|
1006. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
@Spectral Clone The last line of your signature is awesome.It's like naming all the patches of dust so far. What would you call 1.6?
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 10:09:00
|
1007. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
castba wrote: Right, so the hmg issue is how the system registers and calculates damage. Could it be set this way because it would be too taxing to calculate each individual round with the speed they are fired? Also interested if the burst has...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 10:03:00
|
1008. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: Thats it! heavies cant aim! Who wouldve known -_- on the other hand my shotgun can be point blank and still not function properly... Your weapon does, i dont wanna hear it... Although i agree a hmg's spread should be muc...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 09:13:00
|
1009. Well it's official... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shadow heat wrote: I stopped enjoying Dust around 1.2 i think, i officially stopped playing in 1.5, i haven't even try 1.6 yet. I think you should at least play one or two rounds. Just so you remember why your left but also so you remember ...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 09:09:00
|
1010. Well it's official... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm butt hurt. DUST just became a bit too crazy for me at the moment. I'm not leaving and, hell I will be logging on tomorrow but today I just had to step back and say, it's just a game. Let it go... So I did. When have you reached that moment...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 07:34:00
|
1011. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: I don't know if it's actually a bug. It may have always been this way. We just lolled at the description that read "pin-point accurate stream of gunfire." Turns out it's true. Psychology and subjectivity trolled us......
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 05:56:00
|
1012. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: Does anyone know IWS's info? This is something that the CPM should at least have their mind on with the whole TTK issue being dealt with right now TTK in 1.6 is terrible. I hate having my 1.5k hp suit drop in an instant to ...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 05:27:00
|
1013. Hasn't this game always irrefutably been pay-to-win? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gorra Snell wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: I mean, at some point we all must've bought some items with ISK or AUR, right? People mean real money when they say 'pay-to-win', so ISK is irrelevant. Most players seem fairly conte...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 05:24:00
|
1014. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: I don't think the HMG user has to need to be a pin point shooter. Not even AR's have to be pin point. Thats the whole deal, the HMG is not functioning as a weapon that inherently has spread. It...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 05:04:00
|
1015. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Summ Dude wrote: Yea I kinda thought this was common knowledge, at least among HMG users. But I won't complain about having video evidence. Although I recall that among every single thread that has brought this problem up, there's been literall...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 05:01:00
|
1016. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: Crouching just reduces the the large spread (circle) giving a sense of more accuracy. What makes it more accurate is that the gun's kick isn't throwing your gun off target. At least that's what ...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 03:47:00
|
1017. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: XxGhazbaranxX wrote: There really is almost no damage applied even when crouched or really close. That damage is mostly being applied to the center dot. I did the tests over range and everything but there really was...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 03:27:00
|
1018. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disturbingly Bored wrote: +1 for science, and if Cyrius Li-Moody posts here, he'll get a +1 for taking one (or two, or three) for the team. At the risk of sounding like an ass, however: Red reticule means you are doing damage. White reticule ...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 03:10:00
|
1019. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
medomai grey wrote: Advice from a former HMG heavy in Chromosome, when heavies were much weaker than they are now. -Try to keep the majority of the target within the aiming reticle circle. -Start firing before you actually have a line of sigh...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 02:14:00
|
1020. The Heavy machine gun, Accuratly inacurate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: And yet despite this fact the freedom assault, having the tightest dispersion, also has the best damage application at medium to close range. Doesn't make sense, does it? well the video should clear this up. And you...
- by XxGhazbaranxX - at 2013.11.13 01:37:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |