Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2061. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Void Echo wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Void Echo wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So what happens when younget a tank at top av level? Thats a political answer how many should it take down a tank the same tier as the av? ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 08:00:00
|
2062. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Void Echo wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So what happens when younget a tank at top av level? Thats a political answer how many should it take down a tank the same tier as the av? if it takes 3 standard AVers to take dow...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:44:00
|
2063. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: So what happens when younget a tank at top av level? Thats a political answer how many should it take down a tank the same tier as the av? if it takes 3 standard AVers to take down a proto HAV (we don't have anything abo...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:38:00
|
2064. Tankers, here's an interesting scenario to consider. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Void Echo wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Void Echo wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: I find it is difficult to explain to tankers what infantry goes through when dealing with tanks. we find it difficult to expl...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:30:00
|
2065. Tankers, here's an interesting scenario to consider. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Void Echo wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: I find it is difficult to explain to tankers what infantry goes through when dealing with tanks. we find it difficult to explain to infantry what pilots go though when ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:25:00
|
2066. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: If you dont want it to be like the real world, dont use the real world in any of arguments then don't bring up any real world **** in any of your arguments either, then we wont have to, we only respond to what you infantry...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:21:00
|
2067. Tankers, here's an interesting scenario to consider. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: I find it is difficult to explain to tankers what infantry goes through when dealing with tanks. we find it difficult to explain to infantry what pilots go though when dealing with you guys.... we are having trouble...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:11:00
|
2068. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Void Echo wrote: Surt gods end wrote: For all those shouting the COD card. Use BF. they got the vehicle to infantry down right. or planet side. or halo. or unreal. or arma. but those HAV don't last long enough to draw a ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:08:00
|
2069. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rei Shepard wrote: Quote: I face AV of all levels every single match. Those of us tankers that use the forums, the vast, overwhelming majority don't see you, because we're in skirmish. You know, good warm ups for PC battles? You know, one of...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 07:03:00
|
2070. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: For all those shouting the COD card. Use BF. they got the vehicle to infantry down right. or planet side. or halo. or unreal. or arma. but those HAV don't last long enough to draw a fart? no ****, cause THEY ARE FPS GAMES. ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 06:52:00
|
2071. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: SgtDoughnut wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: man... this community cant do anything right. I ask "why arent tanks allowed to be seccessful but infaintry is?" and everyone answers with other complants...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 05:27:00
|
2072. Day of 1.5, tanker meeting in 'Honey Badger' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: If every single tanker in the game does this, they'll either end up on the same side and get borked by the vehicle limiters, or end up on opposite sides and tear each other to s...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 05:24:00
|
2073. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: When a tanker gos 30-0, its OP and needs to be nerfed. When an infantry player gos 30-0 (i.e. AR assault), its perfectly balanced. Why does this phen...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 05:20:00
|
2074. Day of 1.5, tanker meeting in 'Honey Badger' - in General Discussions [original thread]
this should be fun also what time should I get on im central standard time so I don't go by most peoples timezones.
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 05:05:00
|
2075. Tanks Are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: I really couldn't care less how many infantry you killed bc it's stomping ants. I want to see your worth in tank v tank, bc that's how i judge tankers. That's tough for me since I can only use a S...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 04:59:00
|
2076. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: SgtDoughnut wrote: Beck Weathers wrote: I too saved up SP on a charicter got an advanced fit tank and killed everyone in a academy pub mach, and you all should base all your tank bias off that experiance... or not beli...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 04:37:00
|
2077. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: Void Echo wrote: SgtDoughnut wrote: You want to truly **** over a tanker, then make it where the driver is only a driver, he still needs a gunner for even his main gun. That way a tank is always at least 2 people from y...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 03:33:00
|
2078. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: You want to truly **** over a tanker, then make it where the driver is only a driver, he still needs a gunner for even his main gun. That way a tank is always at least 2 people from your team. The driver also being the gunner...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 03:13:00
|
2079. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Checkmate... you just ignored everything in that qoute box. I said both of them do not die. Ppl freak out that tanks got a bunch of kills and dident die, they say its not okay but it is okay when i...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 03:11:00
|
2080. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Ok i understand. In theory , it sounds balanced.But take in consideration 2 things: 1-You can always get road killsPlus ,even witha small turret you can get kills. 2-In Dust, EHP = kills. ...
- by Void Echo - at 2013.09.16 03:08:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |