Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1701. Why vehicles will never touch the ground IF forge is untouched - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: When I call in a sica, equal to a gunloggi in 1.7 without resist, a current advanced assault forge can two shot it with ease. Ve...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.03 17:19:00
|
1702. Why vehicles will never touch the ground IF forge is untouched - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: When I call in a sica, equal to a gunloggi in 1.7 without resist, a current advanced assault forge can two shot it with ease. Vehicles often "hang" on the bolas waiting to be ...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.03 17:11:00
|
1703. Why vehicles will never touch the ground IF forge is untouched - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: When I call in a sica, equal to a gunloggi in 1.7 without resist, a current advanced assault forge can two shot it with ease. Vehicles often "hang" on the bolas waiting to be d...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.03 17:08:00
|
1704. Why vehicles will never touch the ground IF forge is untouched - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: When I call in a sica, equal to a gunloggi in 1.7 without resist, a current advanced assault forge can two shot it with ease. Vehicles often "hang" on the bolas waiting to be dropped. This is absolute candy for an assault for...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.03 16:50:00
|
1705. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: NO. Arc Cannon. Do it. Go in more detail? Message from Godin: Have you read the Empyrean Age? My...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.03 03:18:00
|
1706. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Farsund Solheim wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Farsund Solheim wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: NO. Arc Cannon. Do it. This immediately makes me think the Arc Welder from Red Faction, and i really REALLY like the idea! ...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.03 02:45:00
|
1707. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Farsund Solheim wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Farsund Solheim wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: NO. Arc Cannon. Do it. This immediately makes me think the Arc Welder from Red Faction, and i really REALLY like the idea...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 23:04:00
|
1708. XBOX ONE vs PC vs DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Cosgar wrote: Player trading would be impossible on XBOX One. Why is that? Think about it. I see what you did there
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 21:19:00
|
1709. Fat guys holding light weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Templar Sentinel Templar Scrambler Rifle Toxin SMG Damage Mod Armour Reps Thank you and goodnight. swap the smg for templar ScP and you have one of my fits xD
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 20:48:00
|
1710. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Instead of having the Laser heat up to do more damage, have the target heat up to take more damage. Have it start with Light Laser damage and have the damage ramp up the longer you are on the target. Set it so Time to Kill on...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 19:51:00
|
1711. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Been a lot more responses than I expected. Let's expand the topic, should the heavy laser be AV or AI Why not both? Personally I am also of the opinion that it should be both, but how do you...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 09:13:00
|
1712. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rei Shepard wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Been a lot more responses than I expected. Let's expand the topic, should the heavy laser be AV or AI There is already an AI laser, the forgegun is multi purpse, the HMG is AI, its time for someth...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 09:03:00
|
1713. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Been a lot more responses than I expected. Let's expand the topic, should the heavy laser be AV or AI
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 08:53:00
|
1714. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Farsund Solheim wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: NO. Arc Cannon. Do it. This immediately makes me think the Arc Welder from Red Faction, and i really REALLY like the idea! http://redfaction.wikia.com/wiki/Arc_Welder H...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 07:24:00
|
1715. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Longer you charge it before unleashing the more damage it does to target, unfortunately you also take feedback damage proportional to charge time, put in a max charge time cap so that you're not guaranteed to fry yourself...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 03:38:00
|
1716. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: NO. Arc Cannon. Do it. Go in more detail? Message from Godin: Have you read the Empyrean Age? My eve lore knowledge is sadly lacking >.<
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 03:14:00
|
1717. Dust Pay to Win?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Kira Takizawa wrote: Every Proto AUR item costs little to nothing... CCP you aren't helping the Protostomping case. R/E If there is something better than killing Full protos,is to kill Full Protos with AUR items......
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 02:19:00
|
1718. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Patrick57 wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: So it's a game balance thing? I understand your misgivings, but how would you explain something being able to kill a tank but not a person? I said less e...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 02:11:00
|
1719. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: So it's a game balance thing? I understand your misgivings, but how would you explain something being able to kill a tank but not a person? I said less effective, not completely useless against infan...
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 02:09:00
|
1720. What's your take on the heavy laser? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: NO. Arc Cannon. Do it. Go in more detail?
- by Vitharr Foebane - at 2013.12.02 02:00:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |