| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. How valuable do we think Officer Weapons will be? - in General Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1541350
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.04.01 16:14:00
|
122. How valuable do we think Officer Weapons will be? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: I saw a good maths-ing that the price will eventually stabilise at about 4M per on average, based on an average of one set of three dropping every 20 matches on average. yeah I made that post, i'll link it here in a ...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.04.01 16:13:00
|
123. Incubus vs Lvl 5 Python - in General Discussions [original thread]
Incubus is you're lazy Python if you're boss oh, and why Python can be better than the incubus, but it takes skill because you are generally more fragile.
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.04.01 02:05:00
|
124. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm not mad, I just don't like how scouts don't even have to fit good damps to dodge my proto gal logi scans unless I use a focused. What is the point in being a scanning specialist when it doesn't even work half the time Sure, I can run 4 focus...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 18:17:00
|
125. Change cloaking sound - in General Discussions [original thread]
Then they should make different sounds for decloaking from a spawn, and decloaking from a cloak.
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 16:23:00
|
126. Change cloaking sound - in General Discussions [original thread]
The sound for cloaking is so very similar to the sound people now make when they spawn on uplinks, if not the same. Can you change the two sounds so I don't have a heart attack every time someone spawns on my uplink?
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 13:42:00
|
127. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Virtual Riot wrote: Yes modern technology does makes things less visible to scanning devices. But here we are talking about a device, which upon activation, both bends light waves around itself, and makes it less vis...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 13:36:00
|
128. I just killed three cloaked scouts with a plasma cannon - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Wasn't even aiming at them, I was aiming at a heavy that dodged the projectile. (Yes, PLC projectile is that slow that a heavy can evade it at close range) It was probably the most amusing +50 +50 +50 I have ever had. Imp...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 13:29:00
|
129. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Virtual Riot wrote: So what, when a scout activates his cloak, he simultaneously coats himself is a more absorptive material, and his suit transforms to construct angles that disperse waves? I'm not gonna argue sema...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 13:24:00
|
130. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Virtual Riot wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Virtual Riot wrote: Cloaks don't bend any waves outside the visible light spectrum. Provide a source from DUST which confirms this. EVE doesn't count, its cloak ...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 13:11:00
|
131. Ion Pistol Damage Test Video - in General Discussions [original thread]
GILDENLOCK wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-18gWOn4bs This is my third video covering new sidearms, but unlike the others, this is not a montage video. Basic Variant. No damage mods, No Proficiency. Didn't make it into the video, bu...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 12:44:00
|
132. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ghtyui fdaqq wrote: Dont bash the topic please. The cloaks are new and awesome and fun, I know mines proto on a Cal.. But we need to be honest about their strengths and weaknesses. This may also incorporate something like Enhancing Assault sui...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 12:37:00
|
133. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Virtual Riot wrote: Cloaks don't bend any waves outside the visible light spectrum. Provide a source from DUST which confirms this. EVE doesn't count, its cloak mechanics are different. We aren't the same kind of...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 12:34:00
|
134. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ghtyui fdaqq wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Well... from a physics point of view, radar is light so... And only because I am a nerd and not because I think that the way our current tech works should affect my space man game thousands of year...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 12:29:00
|
135. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Well... from a physics point of view, radar is light so... No..... radar is electromagnetic waves. Light is also electromagnetic waves. But radar is not light -_-" Cloaks don't bend any waves outside the visible light ...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 12:23:00
|
136. Remove Dampining bonus on cloaks - in General Discussions [original thread]
As stated in title. Why do scouts need a free complex dampener with their cloak? This only encourages brick tanking. It doesn't even make sense realistically. A cloak would bend visible light waves, not radar waves or other forms of scanning. ...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.31 12:18:00
|
137. Logis More Fragile Than Scouts??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: I understand that CCP is trying to end the 'death logi' role, but I feel that this last nerf dug our graves. That passive armor rep was necessary for providing support for heavies with a rep tool. I might as well use th...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.30 05:32:00
|
138. Multiple Scanners? - in General Discussions [original thread]
lets stay on topic guys
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.30 05:20:00
|
139. Multiple Scanners? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Virtual Riot wrote: I haven't tried it yet (i'm not near home), but what do you guys think? What do I think? I think that it's a real shame that Active Scanners exist, and provides a reliable crutch for people who can't rely...
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.30 05:18:00
|
140. Multiple Scanners? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: No don't do that. Elaborate?
- by Virtual Riot - at 2014.03.30 04:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |