| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1021. [Suggestion] Animus Charge - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: The Animus Charge is a suicide explosive. Exactly! Which is why it should be used while you're alive. Get yourself in a ba...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 22:41:00
|
1022. [Suggestion] Animus Charge - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: The Animus Charge is a suicide explosive. Exactly! Which is why it should be used while you're alive. Get yourself in a bad situation, cornered by enemies? Active the Anim...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 22:24:00
|
1023. The Vehicle Revamp, Pt.3 - Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Why Turrets, Aren't They Just Fine? No, sir, they are not. In fact, they're broken. Small Railguns are sad, and Large Blasters are king. Why is this so? Because CCP thought it would be a good idea to make one type of turret good for AV, one go...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 22:16:00
|
1024. i think the game needs a way to sell stuff - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
deepfried salad gilliam wrote: P2p trading is in the works P2P Trading? The hell is that? Nevermind, you meant Player to Player. Damn! Stop using acronyms with multiple meanings.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 21:21:00
|
1025. its time to make swarms equipment - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: it is not purely anti vehicle therefore it is not anti vehicle. it is general purpose It was originally meant for Anti-Vehicle use. It didn't work out like that, but that's what CCP had in mind.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 21:14:00
|
1026. The Vehicle Revamp, Pt.2 - Electronic Warfare - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What Is Electronic Warfare? Electronic Warfare is a type of weapon designed to disable enemy vehicles in a multitude of ways. Why Have Electronic Warfare? One of the advantages of E-War as a mechanic is that it lets you design something...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 20:59:00
|
1027. [Suggestion] Animus Charge - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: The Animus Charge is a suicide explosive. Exactly! Which is why it should be used while you're alive. Get yourself in a bad situation, cornered by enemies? Active the Animus Charge! Mwahahaha!
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 20:03:00
|
1028. [Suggestion] Animus Charge - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It would be interesting, but I don't like the idea of an offensive module you can use when incapacitated. If you could only use it while alive, that would be interesting and I might get behind it, but alas...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 19:55:00
|
1029. [Feedback] LP gain at high standing is too low - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Prophet Endokush wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: Why should you thrice as many Loyalty Points for high standing? That's not fair to those just starting FW. they are call LOYALTY points. if you are loyal, you should get them and lots of them....
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 19:49:00
|
1030. Vehicle Limits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This doesn't solve the problem, it only slightly alleviates the issues caused by the problem. The real problem lies with the vehicles themselves.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 19:47:00
|
1031. [Feedback] LP gain at high standing is too low - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Why should you thrice as many Loyalty Points for high standing? That's not fair to those just starting FW.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 19:43:00
|
1032. Ideal Solution to PC Lag? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
When two corporations on different sides of the planet face off, lag becomes unbearable. I, however, have come up with a possible solution to this problem.... Connect the battle servers. Rather than have player connect to a battle server on the o...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 19:40:00
|
1033. The Vehicle Revamp, Pt.1 - Capacitor - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I hear roast tastes excellent if you lightly sear it.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 18:49:00
|
1034. [Request] Heavy Weapon Suggestions - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The names are terrible, and it's obvious that you didn't think their roles through. Honestly, what do you want them to do?
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 18:47:00
|
1035. Swarm Launcher 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ThePlayerkyle13 wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: #3: Anti-Infantry Usage Swarm Launchers are the most limited weapons in Dust 514. I propose they gain the ability to lock-on to infantry. However! This won't come easy. Locking on to infantry...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 18:43:00
|
1036. The Vehicle Revamp, Pt.1 - Capacitor - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What is Capacitor? Capacitor is a resource used by vehicles to activate fitted modules. Without capacitor, vehicles can't use modules. A vehicle's capacitor slowly recharges over time, and is required for all non-basic functionality. A vehicle...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 11:05:00
|
1037. The Real Problem with Tanks... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Here's an idea. What if all turret groups had three variants? One better for AP, one better for AV, and one in between. So for each turret type, you basically have: AP Small Turret Omni Small Turret AV Small Turret AP Medium Turret Omni Medium...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 09:51:00
|
1038. Swarm Launcher 2.0 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Swarm Launcher needs some love, don't you agree? And as such, I propose a few changes! #1: Active Tracking Last I checked, Swarm Missiles had the nasty tendency of not actively tracking (that is, they didn't keep up with the movements of th...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 09:17:00
|
1039. The Real Problem with Tanks... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Infantry still can't kill tanks. That's nice logic. You don't want this nerf, you want a DIFFERENT nerf. You can't have both, amirite?
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 08:54:00
|
1040. its time to make swarms equipment - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Why not just buff Swarm Launchers? I vote for giving it the ability to lock-on to infantry...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.14 08:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |