| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
761. Bullet Drop for Sniper Rifles? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lonegnr wrote: Except, like you just said, you're not nerfing them; most people interested in sniper rifles adjust to bullet drop very quickly, so why would CCP waste time on this when they're already so behind on everything else? Lonegnr, my...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 18:11:00
|
762. Bullet Drop for Sniper Rifles? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Assuming Earth-like gravity, and assuming the Sniper Rifle item description is accurate, the bullet drop wouldn't even be noticeable until around 500 meters. So, why not add bullet drop? That way we can nerf Sniper Rifles without actually nerfing ...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 18:01:00
|
763. The League of Liberal Amarrians [LLA] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: i hate liberals also, so no matter what you are in the empire, if your amarrian, i hate you for the slavery thing, if your with this guy i hate you because your a liberal Liberal Amarrians only seem liberal when you compare t...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:38:00
|
764. Remote explosives should stick to mercs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Well, I'm still assuming this is a clever joke thread, but in case it's not, here we go: The Remote Explosive deals 1500 damage and can't be removed with detonating it. If you get one of these stuck on you, you're guaranteed to die. There's no av...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:33:00
|
765. Reworking the Active Scanner - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: If scanners were meant only for "snapshots" at a specific angle then they would all be instantaneous, and you wouldn't get any more data when turning around. Yet we have some scanners with 5 second scan durations, allowing yo...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:29:00
|
766. The Vehicle Revamp, Pt.3 - Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Do you even tank? On occasion, yes.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:26:00
|
767. Remote explosives should stick to mercs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm going to assume that this is a clever joke thread and move on. Alam Storm wrote: your an idiot this is a stupid idea Is that all you could come up with?
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:25:00
|
768. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've already found the solution.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:23:00
|
769. Preservation of FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Samael Artico wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: Also, I wouldn't call him "dense" as much as I would call him "stubborn". I have mixed feelings about your opinion of me. Whoops, forgot this was a public discussion. Wait, hold on, we should...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 16:03:00
|
770. Preservation of FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Iv hidden his posts, its done. TechMechMeds, I'm sorry to say this, but you seem like the worse offender. From a neutral perspective, it looked like you were intentionally ag...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 15:59:00
|
771. Preservation of FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: Iv hidden his posts, its done. TechMechMeds, I'm sorry to say this, but you seem like the worse offender. From a neutral perspective, it looked like you were intentionally aggravating him. I don't know if you were, but he ...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 15:47:00
|
772. Preservation of FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Also, what's with all the forum drama? It's really annoying to look at, so both of you please stahp.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 15:32:00
|
773. Preservation of FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sorry, but I have to agree with Samael. Somewhat. Factional warfare isn't pointless, but it could probably be more relevant. As it stands now, it's mostly for roleplayers and those who want factional items. And even then, roleplayers have to use ...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 15:25:00
|
774. Theoretical Optimal Ping Limit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: Once we can get quantum entanglement routers latency will be about thirty feet (approx. ten meters). 5 meters to the router, then boop, other side of the world, 5 more meters to the server. Indeed, communication seem...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 14:39:00
|
775. Where's the Suppressive Fire? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Non-existent due to the low TTK. If you supress something, you kill it. It's true that low TTK does make suppressive fire harder to balance, it doesn't make it impossible to exist...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 14:35:00
|
776. Theoretical Optimal Ping Limit - in General Discussions [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: This thread is so full of bulls*** I don't even know where to start. I don't know what you mean, good sir.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 13:31:00
|
777. Preservation of FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RKKR wrote: Wow, OP is clearly not fluid in the english language and you guys take a stab at him for incorrect language usage and responding in a sarcastic manner (that even people who are fluid in english don't even get and just doesn't work i...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 12:39:00
|
778. Theoretical Optimal Ping Limit - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: It has to do with end user not CCP, home run internet connections are slow. I didn't say it was CCP's fault. Also, that excuse doesn't work. If it was just the ISP's fault, Planetary Conquest wouldn't lag nearly as mu...
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 12:38:00
|
779. what was CCP's reason in FW - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: Im talking about the station's factional sovereignty, which is different. Yeah, I know what you're talking about, and it's still a terrible idea.
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 11:26:00
|
780. Theoretical Optimal Ping Limit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: It's possible, just highly highly expensive for CCP to set up. Indeed. Technically feasible, financially unfeasible. But don't crush my dreams, mmk?
- by Ulysses Knapse - at 2013.12.20 10:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |