| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Because they cry about losing their shields instantly, my counter argument is well you should of used a core locus grenade. The logibro argument well anybody with a brain can realize that since almost everybody shield tanks tr...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.24 15:11:00
|
2. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: TheGoebel wrote: D legendary hero wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: D legendary hero wrote: fear anger hate Yissss, let it your hate make your more powerful. Seriously, this issue is better but not resolved. T...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.24 14:53:00
|
3. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: D legendary hero wrote: fear anger hate Yissss, let it your hate make your more powerful. Seriously, this issue is better but not resolved. The armor tank still requires more SP. They need...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.24 14:47:00
|
4. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Madagascan Eagle wrote: Do we know if they are changing the current speed penalty bug where the ferroscale plates negate movement speed penalties? If they fix that to work as intended what do you guys project will be the NE...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.22 16:26:00
|
5. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: TheGoebel wrote: So it looks like we've taken a wait and see attitude here but I'm unsure we should rest. One, the problem isn't resolved. Two, we don't have a road map to its resolution. Maybe I'm a sore winner but...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.22 03:30:00
|
6. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So it looks like we've taken a wait and see attitude here but I'm unsure we should rest. One, the problem isn't resolved. Two, we don't have a road map to its resolution. Maybe I'm a sore winner but I'm happy, not satisfied.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.21 19:26:00
|
7. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: So plates and ferro are soon to be in a reasonable place. Now we can continue to push for reactives to not suck and get us some racial bonuses to help with regen. They are going to be okay but not as a mo...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.15 04:04:00
|
8. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So plates and ferro are soon to be in a reasonable place. Now we can continue to push for reactives to not suck and get us some racial bonuses to help with regen.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.15 03:47:00
|
9. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Cross Atu wrote: Madagascan Eagle wrote: What about some kind of nerf to shields? The time to kill is too long in this game (current explosives excluded). Limit the amount of shield extenders yo...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.13 21:55:00
|
10. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: 100 likes for Goebel! YAY! Considering I only signed onto the forums to post here, I'm pretty proud of myself. Also, Thank you.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.12 01:12:00
|
11. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: TheGoebel wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: It's actually slowing down quite a bit now. I'm fairly certain that they've taken note - my work is done, at least until the next r...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.12 01:06:00
|
12. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Arc-08 wrote: this is one of the most popular threads recently.... where are the DEV'S??? they need to be HERE agreeing with you!!! telling you that this will happen It's ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.11 23:09:00
|
13. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Arc-08 wrote: this is one of the most popular threads recently.... where are the DEV'S??? they need to be HERE agreeing with you!!! telling you that this will happen It's actually slowing down quite a bit now. I...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.11 22:41:00
|
14. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cross Atu wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: SponkSponkSponk wrote: high-slot Armor modules have to be force multipliers rather than pure +ehp, IMO (otherwise just put on complex shield extenders since they regen by themselves anyway). So, s...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.11 20:19:00
|
15. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Please, please, please stop coming up with new module ideas. I'm not saying the ideas aren't creative, because they are, or have no use, because they could, but they sideline examining the actual problem. The problem is that those who spec into sh...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.07 18:08:00
|
16. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Explosive dampening isn't enough. A resistance to damage added to the plates or put in a high slot would be happily accepted. Yes, sign me up for using all my low slots and some of my mid slots for my tank. Honestly, more ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.08.05 12:31:00
|
17. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm beginning to wonder/worry that the flaylock nerf is all the armor balance we're going to get. Maybe CCP thinks their new modules are fine if not for that dastardly flaylock.
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.31 13:30:00
|
18. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: still no dev response... I too would enjoy some news on this subject. They've put out twice as many dev blogs this year then the last two years combined so I know they are communicating finally but why the silence on t...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.30 00:53:00
|
19. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: TheGoebel wrote: Text Grant wrote: Gorgoth24Reborn wrote: The problem is that overpowered gets balanced before underpowered. CCP is still balancing flaylocks, log suits, contact nades, murder taxis, etc. trying to...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.28 04:07:00
|
20. [Feedback] Shields > Armour GÇô A continued imbalance - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Gorgoth24Reborn wrote: Text Grant wrote: Are the devs just in denial about how much armor sucks or do they hate us? The problem is that overpowered gets balanced before underpowered. CCP is still balancing flaylocks, ...
- by TheGoebel - at 2013.07.26 16:58:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |