| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 |
41. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Text Grant wrote: It is easier to kill them with RE's than a forge. Because they are usually spammed all over the map by crap tankers that only use them because they are cheaper than their normal assault fit. If ...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 21:16:00
|
42. Hold off on AV buff until 1.9 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hot-Lips Houlihan wrote: Tanks are fine....if you are tired of getting killed by them......skill into AV. No. If you are tired of being killed by them skill into HAV's. They are very easy to use now unless you run against a better driver t...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 21:11:00
|
43. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Text Grant wrote: I kill tanks all the time. But the easiest ways to do it is with a tank or RE's. But that is NOT the point of this thread. Now you can insult me all day or make a viable argument as to why norma...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 21:07:00
|
44. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eltra Ardell wrote: Text Grant wrote: Buff plasma cannon, re's, proxies, swarms, av nades, and forge gun, but also make infantry weapons do 100%. Why wouldn't they do 100% in the first place? Why would an assault rifle be effective against...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 21:02:00
|
45. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Text Grant wrote: Buff plasma cannon, re's, proxies, swarms, av nades, and forge gun, but also make infantry weapons do 100%. Why wouldn't they do 100% in the first place? So you want buffs to all AV weapons AN...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 21:01:00
|
46. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Text Grant wrote: The Attorney General wrote: How is it that people are calling for buffs to AV nades? Are you guys just that bad? Everytime I use AV nades they work great, how are you guys not able to use the...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 20:56:00
|
47. Hold off on AV buff until 1.9 - in General Discussions [original thread]
"Lets make the game unplayable for infantry for months because we tankers are still butt hurt!" I fixed that for you
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 20:53:00
|
48. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: If they buffed the swarms 25% on top of 1.6 levels AND increased flight time by 2x, I don't think they'd be effective. lol? You ******* terribads. Listen here you mas...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 20:51:00
|
49. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: How is it that people are calling for buffs to AV nades? Are you guys just that bad? Everytime I use AV nades they work great, how are you guys not able to use them? This post is actually asking for peoples opinio...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 20:46:00
|
50. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: So the armor and shields of a tank wouldn't reduce infantry based weapon damage significantly you think? it should register as if your hitting another infantry? Seems like your looking at this from only one angle. Its not like ...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 20:31:00
|
51. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scalesdini wrote: Text Grant wrote: With tanks as op as heck, let us surround them with anti infantry weapons and overwhelm them with 100% firepower. It won't make any difference to real tankers that don't run into the middle of the enemy to...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 05:00:00
|
52. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buff plasma cannon, re's, proxies, swarms, av nades, and forge gun, but also make infantry weapons do 100%. Why wouldn't they do 100% in the first place?
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 04:54:00
|
53. Anti infantry weapon all around buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
With tanks as op as heck, let us surround them with anti infantry weapons and overwhelm them with 100% firepower. It won't make any difference to real tankers that don't run into the middle of the enemy to mow them down with a blaster. No more 10%...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.20 04:49:00
|
54. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The-Errorist wrote: One solution to this problem would be to make large turrets 40% less effective against infantry. This kinda makes sense because small turrets have reduced efficacy against vehicles and installations (go get an LAV and test t...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.16 03:52:00
|
55. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: The current level of tank sustainability is, in my opinion, perfectly fine. You can now fit your tank to be a fragile, but powerful glass cannon or a highly defens...
- by Text Grant - at 2014.01.05 03:22:00
|
56. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have proto swarms with lvl 3 proficiency and I find it much easier to kill tanks with my RE's
- by Text Grant - at 2013.12.31 01:40:00
|
57. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh and I'm following this thread
- by Text Grant - at 2013.12.30 05:38:00
|
58. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
This thread actually makes sense. I think the blaster could be much harder to fit with damage drop off much sooner. I don't think the ROF or damage would need to be messed with then. But yes most of the tanks that bother me are blaster tanks. So h...
- by Text Grant - at 2013.12.30 05:34:00
|
59. Buff RE's - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. Yes. I love this idea. Although I bet it takes a year to be brought in...
- by Text Grant - at 2013.12.24 16:14:00
|
60. Buff RE's - in General Discussions [original thread]
Princess Abi-Hime wrote: Let's carry 10 and have a radius of 100m while we're at it. Nah. That may kill the user.
- by Text Grant - at 2013.12.24 05:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |