With tanks as op as heck, let us surround them with anti infantry weapons and overwhelm them with 100% firepower. It won't make any difference to real tankers that don't run into the middle of the enemy to mow them down with a blaster. No more 10% when you look at a tank, also it will give us more opportunity to check for weak points with our normal weapons.

The business end of your crack pipe must be hot to the touch.

Buff plasma cannon, re's, proxies, swarms, av nades, and forge gun, but also make infantry weapons do 100%. Why wouldn't they do 100% in the first place?

With tanks as op as heck, let us surround them with anti infantry weapons and overwhelm them with 100% firepower. It won't make any difference to real tankers that don't run into the middle of the enemy to mow them down with a blaster. No more 10% when you look at a tank, also it will give us more opportunity to check for weak points with our normal weapons.

The business end of your crack pipe must be hot to the touch.

So the armor and shields of a tank wouldn't reduce infantry based weapon damage significantly you think? it should register as if your hitting another infantry?

Seems like your looking at this from only one angle.

If they buffed the swarms 25% on top of 1.6 levels AND increased flight time by 2x, I don't think they'd be effective.

How is it that people are calling for buffs to AV nades?

Are you guys just that bad? Everytime I use AV nades they work great, how are you guys not able to use them?

lol?
You ******* terribads. Listen here you massive scrubs, CCP should not balance based off of the experience of terrible players, I'm sorry but I'm sick of this. "WAAAAH TANKS ARE OP" and yet running proto swarms with triple complex mods will wreck armor tanks.. "WAAAH THE TANK FLASHES AND IT RUNS AWAY AND I CAN'T KILL IT!", man up.. "ALL LAVS SHOULD DIE BY ME LOOKING AT IT WITH A STERN LOOK!" Yeah, you forgot about LAVs didn't you, ******* idiots, HAVs aren't the only thing in this game, there's a reason people don't use LAVs any more, because they're treated as throwaway vehicles, except my LAV costs near 100k a time and get's wrecked instantly.

If CCP listens to stupid players, it'll just show how bad they are as a developer. AND STOP FIRING EXPLOSIVES AT A SHIELD TANK. jaysus.

The only anti-shield AV weapon is the plasma cannon.
Good luck taking down a decent shield tank with that. Hell, it struggles with a Sica.

Also, if you're losing LAVs to infantry AV you must be incredibly bad. I've lost LAVs to tanks and installations. Never infantry AV, ever.
And if you're only losing LAVs to tanks and you're whining about them being fragile, that only illustrates the point further.

This post is actually asking for peoples opinions on every weapon doing 100% damage to tanks. Or 90% or whatever it would be doing to shields/armor regularly.

And yet, in your second post you call for buffs to ALL AV, including AV nades.

You opened the door, I merely walked through it.

The only anti-shield AV weapon is the plasma cannon.
Good luck taking down a decent shield tank with that. Hell, it struggles with a Sica.

Also, if you're losing LAVs to infantry AV you must be incredibly bad. I've lost LAVs to tanks and installations. Never infantry AV, ever.
And if you're only losing LAVs to tanks and you're whining about them being fragile, that only illustrates the point further.

Buff plasma cannon, re's, proxies, swarms, av nades, and forge gun, but also make infantry weapons do 100%. Why wouldn't they do 100% in the first place?

Buff plasma cannon, re's, proxies, swarms, av nades, and forge gun, but also make infantry weapons do 100%. Why wouldn't they do 100% in the first place?

So you want buffs to all AV weapons AND you want anti infantry weapons to do 100% damage to an armored vehicle?

Seems like a totally reasonable suggestion, but I assume you are going to make the blaster a one hit kill to compensate right?

Or are you just mad because you can't tackle a tank and think that because you are stupid CCP should cater to you?

Why would an assault rifle be effective against an armored vehicle?

Use a Forge against Shields, it might be weaker but due to shields being weaker than armor, two shots will take them out quite fast. I sat on a roof yesterday and devastated four tanks trying to push up. My furthest kill was 280m, it's still very effective but now it cannot dominate the map, just an area.

Also, please, teach me how to tank out an LAV, oh mighty lord Arkena. I lose tanks to AV still, I kill tanks with AV still and if you can aim LAVs are easy as ****, especially due to their low HP it means their resists don't work as well as other vehicles.

I kill tanks all the time. But the easiest ways to do it is with a tank or RE's. But that is NOT the point of this thread. Now you can insult me all day or make a viable argument as to why normal weapons would do 10% damage to tanks.

Methana + hardener and rep. I honestly have yet to lose one to infantry AV despite extensive doom taxi'ing.

Because they are infantry weapons and vehicles are designed to be resistant to small arms fire.

Go and read the descriptions muppet.

Now, defend your statement about wanting all AV buffed to go along with having your rifle turn into a ****** AV weapon.

If you think it is easier to kil atank with RE's than a forge, you are really, really bad.

No wonder you need all this help to try and take out tanks. You must be awful.

It is easier to kill them with RE's than a forge. Because they are usually spammed all over the map by crap tankers that only use them because they are cheaper than their normal assault fit. If you can't admit there are many problems with vehicles in their current state then you are just trolling me.