DUST Search - Buff RE's

All Channels

General Discussions

Buff RE's

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 275	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:11:00 - [1] - Quote When a tank driver is stupid enough to sit still and let me get behind him, I want to feel like a shotgunner. He should be dead the second I get close enough. I'm thinking somewhere around 2000 damage each should do the trick. Just enough that putting 3 "shotgun" or remotes to their backside will kill them (as long as hardeners are not active)
Princess Abi-Hime Pradox XVI 52	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:41:00 - [2] - Quote Let's carry 10 and have a radius of 100m while we're at it. The Metalhead Mercenary
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 276	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:43:00 - [3] - Quote Princess Abi-Hime wrote: Let's carry 10 and have a radius of 100m while we're at it. Nah. That may kill the user.
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 358	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:44:00 - [4] - Quote Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius.
Galvan Nized Deep Space Republic 407	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:44:00 - [5] - Quote It's a slight buff, don't see why it should be out of the question. Apply it at Pro level. Should carry 4 at ADV and get the damage buff at PRO. This creates an actual reason to use the higher tiers. Something needs to happen at higher tiers...either this or slightly increased radius.
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 358	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:46:00 - [6] - Quote I quoted by accident. I agree with a RE buff.
pinsolbaby D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 2	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:49:00 - [7] - Quote Princess Abi-Hime wrote: Let's carry 10 and have a radius of 100m while we're at it. I love this guy. Swarm Launchers= useless / AV grenades= semi-useless
Syeven Reed RETR0 PR0 GAMERS INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS 219	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:52:00 - [8] - Quote grabs popcorn Gÿé Syeven 514
m twiggz Pradox One Proficiency V. 177	Posted - 2013.12.24 05:57:00 - [9] - Quote If there was a way to make this for AV purposes only and not anti-infantry I would be totally onboard.
Protocake JR Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 1191	Posted - 2013.12.24 07:45:00 - [10] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. This is the way to go. +1 The PC and SL should fit into the Sidearm slot so it's accessible and practical to carry one. AV spam vs V spam

Cosgar ParagonX 9011	Posted - 2013.12.24 07:57:00 - [11] - Quote Scale damage up across the tiers, carrying capacity needs to match amount carried, or +1 to capacity/amount carried. They don't need much, just that extra punch. Mines need some serious love though. I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
Johnny Guilt Algintal Core 386	Posted - 2013.12.24 08:09:00 - [12] - Quote They can already kill tanks but only on the tanks back,maybe increase damage from 1500(4500 x3RE) to 1800(5400 x3RE) A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
calvin b SCAVENGER'S DAUGHTER 1290	Posted - 2013.12.24 09:16:00 - [13] - Quote Call in LAV strap 7 RE's onto vehicle. Drive like your A** is on fire. Hit HAV in side, sit back with great satisfaction knowing your lose is 0 ISK and theirs, well who cares TANK514 another sign of cancer in the game
Kasote Denzara A Vulture 1556	Posted - 2013.12.24 09:18:00 - [14] - Quote If I didn't keep getting banned for doing it, I'd suggest using six R/Es and a PM to one-shot HAVs. "Go ahead and dual tank. My Commando dual ganks." -Kasote Denzara The Traitor, in the name of "freedom".
shaman oga Nexus Balusa Horizon 1197	Posted - 2013.12.24 10:40:00 - [15] - Quote We should be able to make chains of RE "Just another piece of duct tape" *Sciogli le trecce ai cavalli, ballano...*
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2726	Posted - 2013.12.24 10:55:00 - [16] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. Bingo. No.
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 2726	Posted - 2013.12.24 10:56:00 - [17] - Quote calvin b wrote: Call in LAV strap 7 RE's onto vehicle. Drive like your A** is on fire. Hit HAV in side, sit back with great satisfaction knowing your lose is 0 ISK and theirs, well who cares And for FW? No.
ratamaq doc Edge Regiment 283	Posted - 2013.12.24 11:06:00 - [18] - Quote I like the idea of both increased damage and/or increased count at higher levels. ADV 4 and PRO 5 would be nice. Until then know this, after you plant the REs hit them with one flux before triggering them. In FW the flux will trigger them. Removing the shield buffer from a maddy, or taking 1500 off the shield from a gunlogi is enough to take them out if hardeners are down with just 3. YouTube 30D Recruiting
jenza aranda BetaMax. 2443	Posted - 2013.12.24 11:52:00 - [19] - Quote a full set of proto REs will kill a tank I did it :) Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
shaman oga Nexus Balusa Horizon 1197	Posted - 2013.12.24 11:58:00 - [20] - Quote Chunky Munkey wrote: calvin b wrote: Call in LAV strap 7 RE's onto vehicle. Drive like your A** is on fire. Hit HAV in side, sit back with great satisfaction knowing your lose is 0 ISK and theirs, well who cares And for FW? Stole the LAV of someone else "Just another piece of duct tape" *Don't nerf my Bolas Launcher*

Vin Mora Sanguis Defense Syndicate 264	Posted - 2013.12.24 12:03:00 - [21] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Scale damage up across the tiers, carrying capacity needs to match amount carried, or +1 to capacity/amount carried. They don't need much, just that extra punch. Mines need some serious love though. Slow your roll there Cosgar, this is one of the reasons that REs are balanced, they don't scale in damage and blast radius. IMO, this is exactly how all explosives should work. Sanguis Defense Syndicate: Recruitment now open for players of all skill levels
negative49er The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 441	Posted - 2013.12.24 12:18:00 - [22] - Quote I'm down for increasing throw speed Dedicated Shotgun Scout
IVIaster LUKE 152	Posted - 2013.12.24 12:45:00 - [23] - Quote Careful what you wish for... "If you can dodge a Wrench, you can dodge a Duvolle".
Mortedeamor 1099	Posted - 2013.12.24 12:51:00 - [24] - Quote re's are meant for infantry they need to be nerfed to under 1 k dmg for any re's thats not proto.only proto re's should deal enough dmg to wipe out proto suits closed beta veteran 37mill sp proto ammar logi, assault, heavy
Makuta Miserix Better Hide R Die 213	Posted - 2013.12.24 12:55:00 - [25] - Quote Mortedeamor wrote: re's are meant for infantry they need to be nerfed to under 1 k dmg for any re's thats not proto.only proto re's should deal enough dmg to wipe out proto suits I'm pretty sure they are meant for more than just anti-infantry. May Scout's rise up again, and bring forth terror upon their enemies. Dust 514 Private Beta Vet
jerrmy12 kahoalii Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic 185	Posted - 2013.12.24 12:58:00 - [26] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. umm 2 would kill a best fit tank so....3000 recuruit link 5 to 11 mil isk per 100k recuruit
Text Grant Death Firm. Canis Eliminatus Operatives 282	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:14:00 - [27] - Quote Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. Yes. I love this idea. Although I bet it takes a year to be brought in...
Toby Flenderson research lab 163	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:22:00 - [28] - Quote Princess Abi-Hime wrote: Let's carry 10 and have a radius of 100m while we're at it. This isn't a slippery slope. Can you really argue against a tank surviving an attack that requires incredibly high risk/skill/luck on the part of the attacker with incredibly low skill on the part of the tanker? Tankers can get away with just about anything with shield hardeners so if they're stupid enough to stay vulnerable long enough for a scout with REs to get close then they deserve to lose their tank. They're already being forgiven for just about any mistake they can make by their incredible speed/defense. This is ridiculous to think they can survive this kind of attack.
Ivy Zalinto Lo-Tech Solutions Ltd 214	Posted - 2013.12.24 16:57:00 - [29] - Quote Apply flux grenade just before detonation and youll be fine, trust me. The higher tier the better on the flux. Dedicated Stealth Scout. Scout instructor; Learning Coalition Scrambler Pistol dedication
Alena Ventrallis The Neutral Zone 368	Posted - 2013.12.24 18:34:00 - [30] - Quote jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Suppose we have a breach RE, with very high damage and a very small radius? 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. umm 2 would kill a best fit tank so....3000 Thats the point. A tank should fear getting stuck with these. Make them hesitate entering close quarters where someone can quickly run up and stick them, such as a city. Make them want infantry surrounding them at all times. It should take 2 to down a militia tank, 3 for the standard tanks. Hardeners up or not. If you can get in close enough to stick a tank, you've earned that kill.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.