| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quickgloves wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: As long as AV can get on top of buildings and shoot all the way to the ground there will be no balance. Why stand on the ground and fight a tank when you can just go to the top of a building and spam av f...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.30 22:33:00
|
22. If you saw CCP dev in a match-What would you do? - in General Discussions [original thread]
would run him over, repeatedly with my invincible LAV
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.30 18:34:00
|
23. Thoughts on 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I bet we have the option to take off passenger turrets. However I bet there is still a seat for a passenger there. The point is to eliminate blue berrys free riding in my tank. I could care less if that blueberry has a good match cause he got in m...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.30 07:35:00
|
24. Thoughts on 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
this is only speculation... i could be wrong and i hope i am
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.30 07:35:00
|
25. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
jamstar saa187 wrote: to be fair Ted, there is no (single) AV that can fire off enough volleys to kill a smart tank driver that has a decent Turbo equipped and is aware of his escape route. (ie. the smart tank driver wont get caught in the open...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.30 07:32:00
|
26. Who was that pilot who liked to run shield transfer vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Lillica Deathdealer wrote: Well, I've been using shield transfer derpships alot lately... Chances are whoever you're looking for can be found in 'Honey Badger' chat (include the ' in name) at some time during the day. I...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.30 07:26:00
|
27. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
jamstar saa187 wrote: and really, what tank driver doesn't see that they are getting hit by an AV? they may not be able to pinpoint where its coming from, but they usually know they are taking damage. the smart ones get ghost until they can ide...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 20:33:00
|
28. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
and i dont promote tanks on buildings either... that is just stupid
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 18:50:00
|
29. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
jamstar saa187 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: As long as AV can get on top of buildings and shoot all the way to the ground there will be no balance. Why stand on the ground and fight a tank when you can just go to the top of a building and spam a...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 18:37:00
|
30. Just throwing this out there about vehicle ammo - in General Discussions [original thread]
i take tanks out with 2 and 3 shots.... 10 shots tho? damn bud you sure you aint splashin em instead of hittin em?
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 17:23:00
|
31. Just throwing this out there about vehicle ammo - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Judgment wrote: the T-90 tank in real life has an ammo capacity of 43 for its main cannon so on a futuristic tank i expect at least 43 rounds in a Railcannon that is all i was thinking like 10 for rails.. 500 for blasters and ...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 17:14:00
|
32. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Ted and Lurch must have a hard time with every infantry man invisible firing invisible weapons. Poor ted even unable to comprehend the limitations of his main turrets elevation as he sits at the base of a tower wondering wh...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 17:10:00
|
33. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
DR88VIPER Starrunner wrote: I dunno. every 1 always crying bout tankers and av. asking for respects coz they cant own with there tank anymore. bitching bout turrets and how they need to be destroyed otherwise they hurt ur precious tank.. but wh...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 14:53:00
|
34. 1.5 squad locking vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: btw Wolfman, since I have seemingly kidnapped you and taken your ears all to myself in this thread i just wanted to throw an idea by ya just for ***** and gigs.... wouldn't a directional webifier in the form of a small turr...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 10:17:00
|
35. 1.5 squad locking vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
watch us get a tank with the option to not put turrets on it while still allowing a seat in the tank.... i was hoping for something to allow me and only me in the tank... **** a blueberry
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 10:12:00
|
36. CCP.....what have you done? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Repe Susi wrote: Shows they really are onto something, doesn't it? After all the CCP shaming and everything, we still have quite a dedicated core playing Dust 514. It's awesome. if it wasnt for us 5000 or so players there would be nothing
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 10:04:00
|
37. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
my tank has no counter to it what so ever....
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 08:38:00
|
38. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
im just sayin its dumb how people get on top of towers, buildings, or whatever
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 08:37:00
|
39. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: As long as AV can get on top of buildings and shoot all the way to the ground there will be no balance. Why stand on the ground and fight a tank when you can just go to the top of a building and ...
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 08:18:00
|
40. Tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
av shouldnt be able to get on top of buildings... no one should especially if the game cant even render an image to at least show me you are there
- by Ted Nugget - at 2013.08.29 05:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |