DUST Search - 1.5 squad locking vehicles?

All Channels

General Discussions

1.5 squad locking vehicles?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)

CCP Wolfman C C P C C P Alliance 1585	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:10:00 - [31] - Quote Lurchasaurus wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Yup, most of it is. The animation LOD switching and thruster effects optimizations were us (the latter task was a collaboration with other teams). The LOD tasks fixed a boatload of horrible animation glitches and bugs including some that effected targeting. The thruster work improves frame rate. I don't think of either of those were a waste of time :-) Neither does anyone who cares about the health of this game. Wolfman, how do you come on these forums and leave without hating us? Plenty of people give me lamb. Totally worth it.

Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1155	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:11:00 - [32] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Yup, most of it is. The animation LOD switching and thruster effects optimizations were us (the latter task was a collaboration with other teams). The LOD tasks fixed a boatload of horrible animation glitches and bugs including some that effected targeting. The thruster work improves frame rate. I don't think of either of those were a waste of time :-) Neither does anyone who cares about the health of this game. Wolfman, how do you come on these forums and leave without hating us? Plenty of people give me lamb. Totally worth it. You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 219	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:12:00 - [33] - Quote watch us get a tank with the option to not put turrets on it while still allowing a seat in the tank.... i was hoping for something to allow me and only me in the tank... **** a blueberry

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 925	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:12:00 - [34] - Quote Nguruthos IX wrote: Rejoice. Now if only we could hear that some day RDV's won't spawn into / ram dropships with no warning that'd be great. intelligent collision avoidance seems a prudent feature for an RDV on either side. I'm pretty sure there were some changes to RDV drop off behaviour with 1.4, but I don't know if this was one of them. Lay out some honeyed lamb and maybe CCP Wolfman can tell you. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1155	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:15:00 - [35] - Quote btw Wolfman, since I have seemingly kidnapped you and taken your ears all to myself in this thread i just wanted to throw an idea by ya just for ***** and gigs.... wouldn't a directional webifier in the form of a small turret be absolutely badass?!?!?! i love that you guys come and joke around on the forums. it makes me feel confortable talkin to you guys like this , which is freaking epic.
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1155	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:16:00 - [36] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Rejoice. Now if only we could hear that some day RDV's won't spawn into / ram dropships with no warning that'd be great. intelligent collision avoidance seems a prudent feature for an RDV on either side. I'm pretty sure there were some changes to RDV drop off behaviour with 1.4, but I don't know if this was one of them. Lay out some honeyed lamb and maybe CCP Wolfman can tell you. sweet. nothing like a RDV comin in to tell ya, "Ya......nevermind." LOL
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 219	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:17:00 - [37] - Quote Lurchasaurus wrote: btw Wolfman, since I have seemingly kidnapped you and taken your ears all to myself in this thread i just wanted to throw an idea by ya just for ***** and gigs.... wouldn't a directional webifier in the form of a small turret be absolutely badass?!?!?! i love that you guys come and joke around on the forums. it makes me feel confortable talkin to you guys like this , which is freaking epic. why do you want a webifier your already faster than me... bastard
steadyhand amarr Imperfects Negative-Feedback 1170	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:20:00 - [38] - Quote To give ccp some credit I don't no any other game that allows verc deployments anywhere in the game they way rdvs do it
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1155	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:21:00 - [39] - Quote Ted Nugget wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: btw Wolfman, since I have seemingly kidnapped you and taken your ears all to myself in this thread i just wanted to throw an idea by ya just for ***** and gigs.... wouldn't a directional webifier in the form of a small turret be absolutely badass?!?!?! i love that you guys come and joke around on the forums. it makes me feel confortable talkin to you guys like this , which is freaking epic. why do you want a webifier your already faster than me... bastard so when those freaking swarmers are bobbing in and out of cover like a gopher i can just go, "Um......no." turns turret
Nguruthos IX Vagina Bombers 1201	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:21:00 - [40] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Rejoice. Now if only we could hear that some day RDV's won't spawn into / ram dropships with no warning that'd be great. intelligent collision avoidance seems a prudent feature for an RDV on either side. I'm pretty sure there were some changes to RDV drop off behaviour with 1.4, but I don't know if this was one of them. Lay out some honeyed lamb and maybe CCP Wolfman can tell you. Lambs in the oven. RDV's get in and out quicker now, and spawn in at a lower altitude. So incidents are less frequent but still nothing changed that prevents this from happening. Ask that condor squad with the blue tag on it now. We lost 3 ships today from RDV's. They just spawn in where you're at or a foot away giving you exactly zero seconds reaction time till instant death.

Nguruthos IX Vagina Bombers 1201	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:25:00 - [41] - Quote http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyV9WoY5ALI&feature=player_detailpage#t=51 RDV :(
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1159	Posted - 2013.08.29 10:43:00 - [42] - Quote dang, guess its back to work for wolfman. preciate the forum activity wolf n logibro
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1134	Posted - 2013.08.29 11:03:00 - [43] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. No small turrets on for the next month after 1.5 drops
Nguruthos IX Vagina Bombers 1225	Posted - 2013.08.30 05:30:00 - [44] - Quote This was a good thread
Shadow of War88 0uter.Heaven 55	Posted - 2013.08.30 05:39:00 - [45] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. wtf u doin with ur time
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 5962	Posted - 2013.08.30 05:57:00 - [46] - Quote Shadow of War88 wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. wtf u doin with ur time Gutting the entire vehicle system and reviving it, with enough lamb, at least.
THE TRAINSPOTTER ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN 261	Posted - 2013.08.30 10:17:00 - [47] - Quote ChromeBreaker wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Void Echo wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. OMG OMG OMG FINALLY, although you couldv started earlier... Glad you're happy :-) What you should keep in mind is that with features like this it's usually going up against others and we have to make a call on what's more important. For example should we have added locks to the vehicles instead of fixing problems we found with hit detection or aiming? Should we add locks now or fix these 20 irritating little bugs/glitches? These are the kind of calls we have to make with all features like this no matter how much we really want to add them sometimes we have to wait. Anyway, I'll let you guys know when we do start on it. Essentially the idea is to allow a toggle for me/squad/team. "Visuals * Improved animation LOD switching for better visual display * Added new vehicle shield and vehicle armor effects * Optimizations made to vehicle models and dropship thruster effects to decrease performance cost * Made Visual improvements to SSAO, rays and dynamic tone mapping * Added HUD translucency option * Environment Mood color values reset to match the corresponding level moods * Fixed particle lights so weapons and objects around the player will be illuminated when firing a weapon * Fixed shield impact effects for small handheld weapons so itGÇÖs visually easier to recognize if you are inflicting shield or armor damage" wasted time , thats what that is Thats a differant team dude.... Art more than features they should use that team somewhere that matters , like gameplay fixes it seems its too much for CCP to handle , this game is still in beta
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1071	Posted - 2013.08.30 10:38:00 - [48] - Quote THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: they should use that team somewhere that matters , like gameplay fixes it seems its too much for CCP to handle , this game is still in beta you really dont understand do you lol back under the bridge with you
Sylwester Dziewiecki Beyond Hypothetical Box 157	Posted - 2013.08.30 10:45:00 - [49] - Quote THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: they should use that team somewhere that matters , like gameplay fixes it seems its too much for CCP to handle , this game is still in beta Jesus ******* Christ, CCP is full of people that specialize at something, there is no use at forcing Graphic Designers to do code writing stuff. It's like sending kitchen chief to do laundry.. do you get it now? "Next"
Sylwester Dziewiecki Beyond Hypothetical Box 157	Posted - 2013.08.30 10:58:00 - [50] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Quote: Wolfman, sarcasm aside, this is a very valid point. It is quite crippling to not be able to see forges charging up. The problem you're experiencing may be related to a draw distance bug on HAV's that we have fixed in 1.4. Either way, I'll check. After reading 1.4 patch notes me time spend on dust dramatically dropped. Mostly because of Swarm changes and no info about draw distance on HAV that I wanted to see being fix badly. If this part of patch notes is about fixing "HAV draw distance": Bug fixes and polish * Fixed a bug on vehicles that prevented them from using the correct view distance at certain angles then it's not bright enough, because we(pilots) didn't know that this bug have something to do with certain angles, and stuff. I'm strongly suggest to write it once again without ccp-office-slang so more people can clearly understand that ;-) , and put it to launcher patch notes so everyone will have to read it.

Lorhak Gannarsein DUST University Ivy League 238	Posted - 2013.08.30 11:09:00 - [51] - Quote THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: some more brain-sperg Not seen this guy make a post that isn't 'hurr durr tanks r bad'. Don't expect to.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1145	Posted - 2013.08.30 11:12:00 - [52] - Quote 1.5 has a makeshift lock No small turrets so at least they cant make noise, they may get angry and leave
THE TRAINSPOTTER ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN 261	Posted - 2013.08.30 11:59:00 - [53] - Quote Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: they should use that team somewhere that matters , like gameplay fixes it seems its too much for CCP to handle , this game is still in beta Jesus ******* Christ, CCP is full of people that specialize at something, there is no use at forcing Graphic Designers to do code writing stuff. It's like sending kitchen chief to do laundry.. do you get it now? "Next" they can actually TEST the game , it seems CCP lacks competent testers "forcing" is what they need , they lack everywhere but hey what can you expect from a game made in china NEXT
THE TRAINSPOTTER ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN 261	Posted - 2013.08.30 12:01:00 - [54] - Quote Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: some more brain-sperg Not seen this guy make a post that isn't 'hurr durr tanks r bad'. Don't expect to. LMFAO u that guy that wanted to be smart and failed LMFAO "bu bu ther iz no train in rust514 " like a name should reflect the game you play , you grasping for straws LMFAO
THE TRAINSPOTTER ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN 261	Posted - 2013.08.30 12:02:00 - [55] - Quote ChromeBreaker wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: they should use that team somewhere that matters , like gameplay fixes it seems its too much for CCP to handle , this game is still in beta you really dont understand do you lol back under the bridge with you yes i do , it seems your drone circuits are mad , you mad?
Charlotte O'Dell 0uter.Heaven 1245	Posted - 2013.08.30 13:20:00 - [56] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. Please say 1.6
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1356	Posted - 2013.08.30 13:32:00 - [57] - Quote Nguruthos IX wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyV9WoY5ALI&feature=player_detailpage#t=51 RDV :( RDVs are mean DS killing machines.
Alpha 443-6732 Pure Innocence. EoN. 51	Posted - 2013.08.30 14:07:00 - [58] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Void Echo wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. OMG OMG OMG FINALLY, although you couldv started earlier... Glad you're happy :-) What you should keep in mind is that with features like this it's usually going up against others and we have to make a call on what's more important. For example should we have added locks to the vehicles instead of fixing problems we found with hit detection or aiming? Should we add locks now or fix these 20 irritating little bugs/glitches? These are the kind of calls we have to make with all features like this no matter how much we really want to add them sometimes we have to wait. Anyway, I'll let you guys know when we do start on it. Essentially the idea is to allow a toggle for me/squad/team. I would get the most core features out for tanks first, so that the role is actually playable. Then, iron out the bugs. Also, I was wondering if you could give tankers the ability to remove their large turret? I was thinking that it would be a cool way to create a dedicated support tank, where one could keep the small blasters on to deal with infantry, and trade the turret for extra armour and remote repairing capabilities. Also, in 1.5 will we be getting remote ammo resuppliers for our tanks? That would be another way to make support tanks more viable.
Jake Diesel BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate 12	Posted - 2013.08.30 14:50:00 - [59] - Quote CCP Wolfman wrote: Yes we do. We do plan to add vehicle locks. However we will not have time in 1.5 along with all the other vehicle work. We hope to add them shortly afterwards. Well at least you're giving the option to leave the smaller turrets off. This will allow vehicles to solo it without worrying about blueberries jumping in. But the vehicle lock is definitely the way to go. They can have turrets on and allow whoever they want to enter their vehicle to man them.
Jake Diesel BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate 12	Posted - 2013.08.30 14:56:00 - [60] - Quote Nguruthos IX wrote: CCP Wolfman wrote: Quote: Wolfman, sarcasm aside, this is a very valid point. It is quite crippling to not be able to see forges charging up. The problem you're experiencing may be related to a draw distance bug on HAV's that we have fixed in 1.4. Either way, I'll check. Not quite. That's an issue too but forges used to have a glowing effect around their gun when it was charging. Now we see nothing till a giant ball of death knocks ship out of sky. It was removed, from any distance. Seemingly intentionally. As you may not know, that glowing ball of light was literally a glowing ball of light! As a forger, when you charged your gun in a dark area, all you could see was this big ball of light. You couldn't see the target whatsoever. And that's a worse problem than not knowing where the forger is. Snipers can't be seen when sniping. So ground troops had to deal with it.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page