| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
961. Vehicles - Looking to the future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: That passive resistance to shield extenders was a brilliant idea . You are right about them as well because they only work in tangent with a shield hardener . The PG / CPU would have more merit if the...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.02 12:42:00
|
962. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Read the link I posted above please. I'd rather that be where the discussion takes place. Lovin it all btw. Good to see such a discussion going on!
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 22:28:00
|
963. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: I would just like to say that the hardener Nerf was fair and the tankers who are crying should feel ashamed. Imagine my lolz when I couldn't just turn on a hardener and sit through an orbital! Shield t...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 22:25:00
|
964. Vehicles - Looking to the future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: I like the idea of giving passive resistances to extenders. It'll be more similar to EVE where astacking shield extenders increases your tank through shield recharge rate. I think giving the railgun some proper nerfs as well as ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 22:20:00
|
965. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: alten hilt wrote: You obviously never been on the receiving end of swarms. I've turned 90' corners and had a whole flight of swarms follow me without a problem. I suppose it depends on how far away they are. If I turn a corner ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 13:11:00
|
966. Vehicles - Looking to the future - in General Discussions [original thread]
reserved
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 13:06:00
|
967. Vehicles - Looking to the future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thanks for the feedback on my other posting if you posted. You got the gears a turning, and helped me realize what it is that really upsets me. While I still don't agree with the changes, as I felt other area's needed to be addressed, there's stil...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 13:05:00
|
968. Vehicles - Looking to the future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reserved
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 13:05:00
|
969. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: It depends on my fits... my triple hardend ion cannon/particle cannon/XTmissile fits still kick ass and absorb **** loads incoming AV be it swarms forges and pic's I still haven't lost one of my triple hardend Gunnlogis so ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.04.01 11:20:00
|
970. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Well, vehicles vs AV is in a slightly better spot now, but vehicles vs vehicles is ****** up right now, and that's what I care about. A 0 SP Sica with a MLT hardener and MLT damage mod shouldn't be able to melt right through my ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.31 21:25:00
|
971. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Judge is coming after your rep stacking. Clarity and a bit more clarity . EDIT : I actually meant by this I was going to try kill his tanks with my swarms or ADS. The resulting misunderstanding was interesting howe...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.31 21:24:00
|
972. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
And holy hell, what happened to my thread.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.31 21:10:00
|
973. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Pretty sure he's going after the rep stacking because at the moment, that's looking like it will quickly turn into the only viable fit and running anything else won't be an option. Reducing ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.31 21:08:00
|
974. Vehicle users ONLY - in General Discussions [original thread]
How are these new changes working out for you? Something I've noticed with my gunnlogi, is that with double hardeners up, swarms do a hefty amount of damage now. To me it seems that "waves of opportunity" philosophy was thrown out when you consid...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.31 12:35:00
|
975. The Problem with Assault Dropships - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: A story, nice as it is, is a useless tool for balance. The numbers do not back up your stated facts. Come back with actual evidence and then we can talk. What's your take on the new changes to dropships?
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.30 18:32:00
|
976. Yeah I'm butthurt - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Baby Shaker wrote: I can attest to Tebu and his interest in actual balance between tanks and av. He is one of the few tankers I respect and don't consider him a ***** like the majority of tankers out there lol. He's never wanted an I win bu...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.30 18:02:00
|
977. Vehicles and dropsuits - in General Discussions [original thread]
thomas mak wrote: I know it was long ago but why vehicles lose it's mods, turrets, types? On the other hand dropsuits get more and more types and weapons CCP you want to remove vehicles? Supposed to add them back in. Give it a couple more y...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.30 15:30:00
|
978. Yeah I'm butthurt - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Hardeners and AV WP were at the root of the problem So yes, it does address real issues. Hah, ok. So say those with no experience with tanks. I know already, your feedback was ever more valuable than those that put...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.30 15:24:00
|
979. A Plea to CCP to take more reasonably sized steps. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Saberwing wrote: KalOfTheRathi wrote: Whether CCP/Shanghai Devs have played other FPSs isn't known. In addition, if you announce something on Twitter or Facebook please announce on these forums as well. We do, and we do. :) Hotfix A...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.30 15:21:00
|
980. A Plea to CCP to take more reasonably sized steps. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: Whether CCP/Shanghai Devs have played other FPSs isn't known. But what is known is that these huge changes done, seemingly on the spur of the moment or in response to Forum QQ Kittens is very divisive to the player base. Th...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.03.30 15:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |