| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1441. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I agree with OP that I enjoyed seeing and being a part of bigger tank battles, with escalation. I also agree that since we are having tanks in the game, there should be some variety, preferably some stone/paper/scissors. The ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 17:16:00
|
1442. [VIDEO] Scans are too powerful - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: All scouts no matter what, must be scanned by a proto focused scanner on a gallente logistics suit. its designed to defeat max dampened scouts as their counter. Gallente and Amarr eWar scouts are the only ones that c...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 17:14:00
|
1443. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack 3enimble wrote: ... No Call of Duty >>>>>>>>>>>
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 07:27:00
|
1444. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Currently we have a problem with HAVs that can be summarized as "If tanks are only designed to destroy other tanks, then hy do we need tanks at all right now?" Don't get me wrong, I love tanks...but as they are now, th...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 05:50:00
|
1445. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
RemingtonBeaver wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: You learnt all that from the redline?. K den. Lolk Have you ever been in a tank? Have you ever fought against me? Or are you parroting the same non-argument that e...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 05:18:00
|
1446. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: But that doesn't surprise me, because you cry "it shot me, nerf it" on here and get what you want. Petulant little children. isnt that what you're doing now? as far as V/AV goes it is impossibl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:54:00
|
1447. So I skilled into heavy missile launcher for the splash damage and t... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Timtron Victory wrote: and then CCP removed the splash damage the following week haha You mean large missile turret? I'm pretty sure splash is still there. Barely any splash. You need to have ridiculously good aim to k...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:53:00
|
1448. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
How about some comments on the meat of my posts, instead of nitpicking the other things I wrote? I notice those decrying this post didn't comment on any of that. Probably because they don't have any argument against ADV tanks having more slots, ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:27:00
|
1449. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zepod wrote: 1. FGs Destroy Vehicles in 1 Hit; Sends DSs Into Orbit. No, forge guns are not powered by a capacitor, because vehicles don't have one. Forge guns are jury rigged mining tools; railguns destroy starships. 2. Firing 20GJ &am...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:22:00
|
1450. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Daddrobit wrote: Hakyou Brutor wrote: Can I get a tl;dr? It's speaker dude, you can pretty much assume any posts by him on the matter of tanks is along the lines of, "Buff tanks, nerf infantry, I want to survive longer and kill faster. Yo...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:13:00
|
1451. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hakyou Brutor wrote: Can I get a tl;dr? There isn't one. It's a vehicle thread, and CCP and the CPM are asking for input. What I wrote is a lot of input. I'm not writing only 1000 characters and leave it at that. I've been doing this for too ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:11:00
|
1452. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: how can you expect physics to affect infantry but not vehicles. i shouldn't have been surprised to see a 1 sided argument from you your examples are 1) a car hitting a soft unarmored target. if that was a statue made of stee...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:09:00
|
1453. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: ... tl, dr AV is a deterrent, not the Highlander of the battlefield. We don't want to be Highlander either. I just want to pound on tanks and send their pilots back to the clone vats. Occasionally I'd like to be able t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.15 04:00:00
|
1454. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: You learnt all that from the redline?. K den. Lolk Have you ever been in a tank? Have you ever fought against me? Or are you parroting the same non-argument that everybody else uses?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 20:38:00
|
1455. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: A triple rep tank is not following Gallentean lore. It was an exploit developed by players and masked as legitimate gameplay. No Gallentean ship will ever use triple reps. Maybe 2 at best. One Ancillary and one standard. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 18:43:00
|
1456. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
5th reply needed I'm going to assign infantry some homework they can think about night. Despite the nerfs to vehicles and buffs to AV, you continued to get on the forums to call for more nerfs to vehicles and more buffs to AV. There have been ti...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 17:10:00
|
1457. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
reserved
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 16:56:00
|
1458. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
reserved
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 16:55:00
|
1459. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
reserved this will be a long post
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 16:54:00
|
1460. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
reserved
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.14 16:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |