| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2721. So i set out as AV infantry today - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: Do you not see a problem? You destroyed 14 tanks in how many games? 14! Since when was there 14 tanks to be destroyed in a whole day?? FORTEEN! You can kill all the clown car tankers you want, they can just keep calling in more &am...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 07:21:00
|
2722. So i set out as AV infantry today - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: i have collected the burning husks of the following tanks 3 Railgun Gunnlogis 2 railgun Sicas 1 blaster Sica 6 blaster Somas 1 rail Soma 1 Blaster Madrugar thats 14 tanks in as many games my fit? i just added AV ganades...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 07:03:00
|
2723. So i set out as AV infantry today - in General Discussions [original thread]
SUNNY THE NINJA wrote: I heard you could just plop some RE's on a LAV and ram a tank. Is this true? If so i have a LAV blueprint and i'm not afraid to use it. That's the new crutch CCP didn't tell you you have now.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 06:54:00
|
2724. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: So remove AV weapons all together? Have you ever played Homefront? You don't have a clue what an OP tank is until you played that. An Apache helicopter, Hellfire missles, RPGs, and C4 attacking at once wouldn't kill a tank. That's ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 06:24:00
|
2725. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Sacrifices? What sacrifices?...Basically the same with a forge, especially from a high point, because you're equally as effective against vehicles as you are against infantry. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA You'...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 06:23:00
|
2726. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqua-Regia wrote: Green Living wrote: Yeah man. It's back to the MCC to AFK for me. Have had enough. Me too. Wouldn't it just be wonderful if you had more tankers?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 06:22:00
|
2727. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Faunher wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Faunher wrote: The problem is not the tankers... It's the hundreds of people running around with ridiculously accessible and effective militia tanks, who often have not a single skill point in vehicles....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 06:21:00
|
2728. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maciej Szambelan wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: i just kill the tanks instead of complaining on the forums.... its not exactly hard, its just now you have to actually FIGHT a tank rather then just slaughter it.... Yeah, ok but the game shoul...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:49:00
|
2729. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Faunher wrote: The problem is not the tankers... It's the hundreds of people running around with ridiculously accessible and effective militia tanks, who often have not a single skill point in vehicles. If we are going to be whining about an...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:46:00
|
2730. i'm sorry, I'm a fangirl. looking for channels, discussions. - in General Discussions [original thread]
virgindestroyer7 wrote: I've been playing DUST for a year and a half and i can't get enough of it. I love this community, I love the posts and discussions that need graphical calculators to determine well.. anything, and i love you trollololole...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:42:00
|
2731. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
burning powers wrote: Tanks are being a constant problem and will kill Dust if they are continuing to litter the battlefield. now days we only see 5 tanks roaming the maps from the enemy or allied forces. This has what the game has become.. Onl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:38:00
|
2732. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the past few months. And ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:37:00
|
2733. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:36:00
|
2734. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''Of course I have a brain, you need one to be a tanker.'' Not a lot in 1.7, there by the tank spam ''Why don't you try tanking for a week?'' I think you havn't been around a lot huh? My AV weapon...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:34:00
|
2735. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the past few months. And...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:13:00
|
2736. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the past few months. And I am only running Advance...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:52:00
|
2737. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You were killed by a MLT missile from a dropship, and continued to use AV even though you called yourself a tanker. Your opinion is invalid. I was spider tanking that round, so the tank's fit had it's hard...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:48:00
|
2738. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: 34+ mil SP? Jeez, and I thought I had no life. You have no brain.Its different. You cant even tell you are mistaken. Even with all these people trying to explain it to you.Even TANKERS....An...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:47:00
|
2739. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker? I don't know, maybe it's because not everyone is a tanker. And maybe it's because I shouldn't have to be a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:39:00
|
2740. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Because infantry wit...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |