| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2681. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Yes really. Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles. Everybody wins. HTFU I did, I called in a Soma, activated a hardener and damage mod and ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:22:00
|
2682. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Yes really. Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles. Everybody wins. I like this. Of course you like it, you relied on the 400m lock on crutch while you ha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:21:00
|
2683. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Remove AV. they did You're only saying that because you relied on a 400m lock on range crutch.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:18:00
|
2684. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lynn Beck wrote: Reduce RoF and give us a plasma-cannon turret. Do you even tank?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:17:00
|
2685. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: Blaster turrets have gotten really silly, lately. The main problem is how many rounds each clip holds. Rail guns and missiles are reasonable. (9-12 rounds.) Blasters on the other hand, are downright stupid. It shou...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:15:00
|
2686. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Honestly its a reasonable idea and the blaster turret has always been in a ridiculous idea, should have been essentially a big ass plasma cannon instead Of course you'd agree with that. But then we have to lose all Gallente ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:14:00
|
2687. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Remove AV. Considering it takes around 3-5 people to take down my 72k tank, It's practically a non issue. Blasters however are more effective than any infantry weapon. So basically, tanks get all the po...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:13:00
|
2688. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Yes really. Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles. Everybody wins. HTFU
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:10:00
|
2689. what if CCP WANTED 4+ tanks each team every game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Darken-Sol wrote: Keri Starlight wrote: It might be. It still sucks. for people who can't think. I bet life does too, you morons have it rough. Yup anyone that can think has switched to milit...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:09:00
|
2690. what if CCP WANTED 4+ tanks each team every game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: what if things are working as intended? Hypocritical = infantry forces vehicle changes on CCP, CCP changes vehicle how they'd like them to be, infantry isn't happy with the changes.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 06:08:00
|
2691. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So one time makes me a bad tanker, Adam And Steve? No it doesn't. However, I could also say the same to you everytime you bring up that time were I got killed by an Assault Dropship. Because being kille...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 05:33:00
|
2692. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Delta 749 wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your cre...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 05:24:00
|
2693. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are st...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.17 05:23:00
|
2694. what are swarms supposed to do? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Swarms = AV weapon AV = Anti vehicle I still see players kill vehicles with swarms Why cant you do the same? Easy watch a tank shooting at another tank till the tank you want to shoot is ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:48:00
|
2695. a call out to real tankers and talented av - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: I'll join. As both a real tanker and talented "AV" Lol you're not a real tanker.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:45:00
|
2696. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Lol you think being infantry is expensive? It's cheaper than being AV How many times do I have to say your opinion is invalidated due to you using swarms instead...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:41:00
|
2697. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: I hope so. Infantry only combat is really boring TBH. Epic fights with tanks, AV, infantry, Dropships is why I started to get interested in Dust 514. It's a lot mor...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:40:00
|
2698. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still tryin...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:39:00
|
2699. A quick PSA about vehicle crews. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: I'd like to get this off my chest, as I've seen people defend this-or-that with excuses about maximum crew and such-n-such. As a current standard infantryman who played AV in E3 and HAVs on the tail of Chromosome, I like to ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:35:00
|
2700. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: ah...this thread. AV is AV. Not a deterrent. And that is just FACTS OF LIFE The way you want the game to work is not the way CCP wants the game to work. Accept that or give up your ISK and leave.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 19:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |