| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2021. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: I've seen maybe 2 or 3 tankers actually talk about tank and vehicle balance. You and Taka however...not once have I seen you two even try to talk about balance. You've actually said "Too bad, AV was OP now tanks get to be O...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:46:00
|
2022. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALT2 acc wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What gives tankers the right to decide the fate of infantry? Because that's exactly what they're doing now. Practically every match comes down to who spams the most tanks. Hav cap per team, simple.....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:46:00
|
2023. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What gives tankers the right to decide the fate of infantry? Because that's exactly what they're doing now. Practically every match comes down to who spams the most tanks. LOL That's in the game. I'm referring to inf...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:45:00
|
2024. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank pilots, not just one dropship pilot who happens t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:34:00
|
2025. Massive Flaw in CCP's "Window of Opportunity" Vehicle ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Funkmaster Whale wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I will always throw out this little tidbit. When infantry complained about the contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry told them to ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:16:00
|
2026. Massive Flaw in CCP's "Window of Opportunity" Vehicle ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: AV was never too strong. Just never did we have a Sagaris in uprising. Never too strong? Were you ever on either side of swarms? PRO with proficiency and plenty of damage mods plowed through a third of a Madrugar's...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:15:00
|
2027. Massive Flaw in CCP's "Window of Opportunity" Vehicle ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I will always through out this little tidbit. When infantry complained about the contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry told them to HTFU.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:09:00
|
2028. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. So then as infant...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:07:00
|
2029. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. So then as infa...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 19:58:00
|
2030. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. So then as infantry, YOU choose 2, because you can't have a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 19:49:00
|
2031. Tanks - 1.8 changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP fixed tanks already. Infantry forced them to. Why aren't you happy with what you forced on them?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:50:00
|
2032. What If Tankers Are Doing Us A Favor? - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bax Zanith wrote: Probably not. Most tankers hid in tanks because its an indestructible I win button. As infemtry most them will pribably fell usless or not achieve a high KDR witch means something ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:44:00
|
2033. if tanks aren't fixed in 1.8, then what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: All of this Tank talk has me wanting to login, throw 3,000,000 SP into FGs, buy some MLT Dropships, and make these chode lickers a thing of the past. But, I'm not burning up my PS3 with 'Fatal Error'514 just to put a few scrubs...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:42:00
|
2034. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit one hardener per vehicle. Boom. lolno We don't tell you how to fit out your suits. Don't tell us how we can fit our vehicles.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:29:00
|
2035. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Copy-pasted from my PSA: 2x complex armor hardener + core skills IV (the +duration and -cooldown ones) = perma-hardened Madrugar with room for a repper. "Waves of opportunity" that is not. Complex armor hardeners? lolwut? W...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:28:00
|
2036. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: True that. Makes it really hard to kill tanks because the second you sneak on them they pull on hardeners and boost out of there with there fuel injectors. So tanks aren't allowed to have anything that makes them harder t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:27:00
|
2037. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: Some one try to prove me wrong. lolwut
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:26:00
|
2038. First four games today - in General Discussions [original thread]
Parson Atreides wrote: All skirmish 1. Fatal Error half-way through 2. Had to spend 3/4 of the match using swarms because of tank spam. At least we won this one. 3. Literally 14 snipers for the last half of the match. The first half was very cl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:25:00
|
2039. if tanks aren't fixed in 1.8, then what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
There's nothing wrong with tanks.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:24:00
|
2040. What If Tankers Are Doing Us A Favor? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bax Zanith wrote: Probably not. Most tankers hid in tanks because its an indestructible I win button. As infemtry most them will pribably fell usless or not achieve a high KDR witch means something to them some how. These are my views on tanke...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:23:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |