| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1301. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: True, I like the increase to slots but decrease to base HP. Puts more emphasis on WHAT You fit on your hull, not just what your base hull has naturally. It's a philosophy I want to apply to LAVs as we...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 23:46:00
|
1302. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: well, why don't we just give all suits 0 ehp but a bunch of slots. It just doesn't make sense. There is no point in how much base HP you take away slots you give, in the end, it will always go toward a...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 22:11:00
|
1303. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Heavies have high HP, this allows them to choose modules other than extenders and plates. Why shouldn't this be same for HAV. Why must tanks be forced to tank, why not have scanners or CRU's or fuel injec...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:55:00
|
1304. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: The whole point of changing the slot layout and base hp is so you ARENT forced to tank....... If you want to build a tank around utility, you can with these ideas. If you want hp, you can put on hp mods, but you don't have to. ...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:28:00
|
1305. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
duster 35000 wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: duster 35000 wrote: True Adamance wrote: duster 35000 wrote: So would the marauders have 5/2 and 2/5? And what would thier base hp be? They could be depending on whether or not we here can ...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:22:00
|
1306. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 3. Problem is if you make the hull base HP too low it just means you will have to use a slot for a HP module anyways That's kind of the idea. It ma...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:16:00
|
1307. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
duster 35000 wrote: True Adamance wrote: duster 35000 wrote: So would the marauders have 5/2 and 2/5? And what would thier base hp be? They could be depending on whether or not we here can come with a way to abuse 5 slots..... Old ...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:13:00
|
1308. ACR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: The assault Combat rifle and hell even the combat rifle seem to still perform too well.... Numerically speaking things have gotten better and they don't stand appear all so powerful, My notes thus far based off of the M...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:05:00
|
1309. The good, the sad, and the ugly - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBabar wrote: The Good: After 2 weeks of not thouching it I might finally be rid off my 15 year old habit of smoking. The suck has died down to a tolerable level and I have even been sober for 2 whole days. I intend to keep this up cause ev...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 21:02:00
|
1310. Remove squads from Ambush. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Please. Just trust me.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 04:03:00
|
1311. Ambush OMS is so one sided. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
My team just got beat 0-70...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.19 03:15:00
|
1312. [Feedback Request] Small Missiles and ADS Skills - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Hi folks, It's me again, harping on about ADSs and small missile turrets. This time I have good reason though: CCP Rattati wrote: Vehicles Community proposed stats requested: Anti Infantry Small Missiles An...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:53:00
|
1313. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: True Adamance wrote: I think the archetypes CCP Rattati has designed are fine in many respects. Some of his examples from EVE are a little iffy but get the point across, and while he kind of lacks th...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:48:00
|
1314. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: True Adamance wrote: I think the archetypes CCP Rattati has designed are fine in many respects. Some of his examples from EVE are a little iffy but get the point across, and while he kind of lacks the rea...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:46:00
|
1315. update 1.1o - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: GP MACHINE wrote: I was thinking here, and I think being necessary to change the color of the notification is released when the strike warbage, because it is very hard to know due to be appearing every several time on the...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:41:00
|
1316. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I think the archetypes CCP Rattati has designed are fine in many respects. Some of his examples from EVE are a little iffy but get the point across, and while he kind of lacks the real world parallels to draw from it's ver...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:36:00
|
1317. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: duster 35000 wrote: 168 reps per second with a 4 second delay is pathetically slow...and once hardener stacking is fixed shields will never be able to win cqc vs a blaster, atleast blaster vs blaster, more damage to ...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:32:00
|
1318. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. I hope thats for the standard HAVs we have 2. All modules from chrome should be brough back, active armor reppers and nerf passive, constant passive shield regen needs to come back along with ...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 20:19:00
|
1319. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Enforcer is suppose to be less tanked than the Standard Main Battle Tank but a lot more damage, Marauder is suppose to have a lot more tank ever the standard. I believe we can achieve that. Follo...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 03:58:00
|
1320. How to make the Snow Launcher EPIC!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Moochie Cricket wrote: Full auto as well? 120rpm sounds good. deal, it does no damage so you , might as well make it crazy.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.18 03:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |