| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
341. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Ripley Riley wrote: If you are rank 2 or 3 then spend like $5 - $10 and you will be at 4. Otherwise, you will need to play more. Much more. Spend money on Dust? LOL. It's 5 dollars, bro. That's bel...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.16 00:04:00
|
342. Balac's Assault Ck.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quote: 4x Balac's Assault CK.0 for sale. Gimme your highest bid.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 23:58:00
|
343. Sgt. Kirk's Weapons Bazaar & Gallente Arm's Dealer. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Symb's FORK-5 Sniper Rifle - 4 Thale's TAR-07 Sniper Rifle - 56 ~I look Forward to doing business with you. Name your price for the thales and the symb's. Also, name other officer weapons you are willing to trade thos...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 23:48:00
|
344. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Harpyja wrote: Tl;dr Time spent on a game also equates to loyalty and deserves the some respect. Fixed. F2Pers are valuable, but in the end if they don't spend some pocket change on Dust they aren't helping the game stay...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 23:27:00
|
345. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Elpedo Hughes wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Bro, i'm loyalty rank 2 or 3 and I've been playing since chromosome. Seriously CCP?? Seriously? So you think you should have a say on a game you've spent nothing on? You think som...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 22:02:00
|
346. How many legit Alts do you have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knightshade Belladonna wrote: by Legit alt, I would assume it's another character on same account. However by your numbers given, i'm kinda thinking yours isn't all that legit and sounds like passive sp... but maybe i'm wrong. As for alts, I h...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 21:41:00
|
347. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: How can you be 2 or 3? I've been playing since Mordu's Trials and I'm only rank 2. What a joke this loyalty rank system is. IKR!
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 21:37:00
|
348. How many legit Alts do you have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
My main has 43 mil sp. It is vehicles account. Sadly that account had a 10 million sp head start on me and now I'm only one mil behind due to shittty vehicles. Also has Amarr Scout AK.0 and Amarr Heavy AK.0 I have this- 42mil sp- Scout and Assaul...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 21:35:00
|
349. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: If this game was worth investing in I would. Anyway- the team that brings the more isk stands a better chance at winning. Also, trading (pay for loyalty 4) = more officer weapons to some people = win. Y...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:42:00
|
350. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: How can you be 2 or 3? IDK, I was downgraded. how? Did you biomass? no I just randomly went from 4->3
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:41:00
|
351. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Pay to win? The bonuses granted by loyalty rank focus on ISK and LP gains. ISK and LP can be attained by just playing the damn game. Pay to win would be if loyalty rank granted you +10% armor HP, incre...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:20:00
|
352. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: How can you be 2 or 3? IDK, I was downgraded.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:18:00
|
353. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Spend money on Dust? LOL. Then don't complain when your loyalty rank isn't high? Purchasing AUR is the fastest way to get loyalty rank. I also have a hard time believing that you have been here since b...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:14:00
|
354. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: If you are rank 2 or 3 then spend like $5 - $10 and you will be at 4. Otherwise, you will need to play more. Much more. Spend money on Dust? LOL.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:07:00
|
355. [Brain storm] Loyalty rank, can we earn it faster - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Is rank 4 that hard to get to? If you are a player like me that doesn't have a credit card and is broke and hasn't spent a penny on this game- then yes. It can take 3-4 months to go from 3 to level 4.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 19:01:00
|
356. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bro, i'm loyalty rank 2 or 3 and I've been playing since chromosome. Seriously CCP?? Seriously?
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.15 18:57:00
|
357. When player trading opens - in General Discussions [original thread]
Project Carnifax wrote: I am willing to trade: 1x "Quafe" scout m-1 "Quafe assault a-1(Or Templar assault)[CLOSED] 1x "Quafe" assault m-1 "Quafe" assault a-1(Or Templar assault)[CLOSED] 1x "Exile" assault rifle any ScR/AR/SMG/CR BPO [CLO...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.13 21:04:00
|
358. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: I mean before maybe because they costed less, but I mean now... no. Your at most like 150k suit killing a 1.3 million tank? No. You should require teamwork to kill a tank. And please don't tell me "We get killed so much try...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.13 20:40:00
|
359. I could get used to this 50% boost. - in General Discussions [original thread]
It has made FW a lot more rewarding. Whereas before I was using militia starter fits for the base LP, I have moved onto ADV and STD gear. We should keep It this way.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.11 15:15:00
|
360. Small blaster. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Isn't the reticule suppose to be getting smaller?
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.04.11 00:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |