| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3021. OMFG - in General Discussions [original thread]
Enjoy the 25 militia SMGs.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 19:01:00
|
3022. Less Tank more Gank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tyjus Vacca wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: No why not Because HMG's and CR's already instantly annihilate mercs in 0.5s. No need to make it 0.4s. Also, you are about to get a free 5% damage increase from the warbarges.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 18:42:00
|
3023. 'Augmented Ammunition Facility' to provide different bonuses - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Not worth it at all. I might as well focus on the damage for the Ishukone Nova Knives. And if a Minscout user doesn't feel like it's worth it then none of the other classes will. Noted. The exact numbers aren't fixed in my p...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 15:01:00
|
3024. RE: NEW CONTENT GÇô QUAFE GEAR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Strongboxes, as a concept, are fine. It's that keys are incredibly rare (see: stupid rare). We should be able to purchase keys with ISK. Even if it is a large amount of ISK per key, it's better than them only being attainable via AUR. That "keyma...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 14:55:00
|
3025. 514 A rather memorable consecutive daily login record. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Players should get an email after they hit a certain number of consecutive logins. Maybe an email and a 7-day active booster or something.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 14:39:00
|
3026. 'Augmented Ammunition Facility' to provide different bonuses - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The new warbarge 'Augmented Ammunition Facility' subsystem is described as... "Constantly crunching your combat numbers, this subsystem increases the relative power of your primary weapons through methodical preventive maintenance, rigorous calib...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 14:35:00
|
3027. Warbarge 5% damage boost TTK down? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Starlight Burner wrote: I hope TTK is not getting lowered... TTK is going to go down. That's unavoidable with everyone boasting a 5% damage increase after Warlords 1.0.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 13:52:00
|
3028. What if DUST 514 had achievements - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: Platinum Award Get a kill with the Assault Swarm Launcher That's unpossible!
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.29 01:36:00
|
3029. What if DUST 514 had achievements - in General Discussions [original thread]
sebastian the huds wrote: Achievements aren't meant to be impossible, but require skill. kind of sad i had to say that to you of all people. I'm not sure if you noticed, but I have an achievement listed to not play the game because "**** con...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 21:40:00
|
3030. My warbarge will be the best warbarge because.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sned TheDead wrote: [ok so after I finished laughing, I realized that is something I would totally do in one of my campaigns. now I need to figure out how to trick my players into actually paying me to open that box... Make the box require a ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 21:22:00
|
3031. Rumor on the street. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Grease Spillett wrote: No need for proof. What are you, a priest?
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 20:52:00
|
3032. What if DUST 514 had achievements - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: No achievement should be based on Corporation you are killing. I understand that this is mostly tongue in cheek but there are some interesting bits here. In regards to achievements for killing certain corps, I totally ag...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 20:35:00
|
3033. What if DUST 514 had achievements - in General Discussions [original thread]
robin williams' ghost wrote: Dumbass Kill any player using officer gear before he's gotten a kill with it. This. This is perfect.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 19:46:00
|
3034. CCP Rattati, an urgent request! - in General Discussions [original thread]
RayRay James wrote: I'm still waiting on my side arm that shoots tanks Technically, all sidearms can shoot a tank
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 19:34:00
|
3035. CCP Rattati, an urgent request! - in General Discussions [original thread]
JIMvc2 wrote: The Minmatar at its Finest :D Can't wait to use this weapon and its Damage should be 9999999999999999999999999999999999 with a splash radius of 999999999999999999999999999999999 Reload 0.01 and ammo 99999999999999999999999999999...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 18:59:00
|
3036. CCP Rattati, an urgent request! - in General Discussions [original thread]
MrShooter01 wrote: What you have just witnessed is a Faction Tech III Officer Deadspace Minmatar Officer Weapon of Mass Destruction, Meta 73 The enemy just call it "Percy". Also, I just noticed the missile is firing bullets. I can't see throu...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 18:46:00
|
3037. CCP Rattati, an urgent request! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vordred Knight wrote: Minmatar Hav work in progress It's like if an AT-AT and a Minmatar ship had a mutant love child.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 18:35:00
|
3038. CCP Rattati, an urgent request! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buwaro Draemon wrote: Is this some kind of Minmatar contraption? Our best scientists say maybe.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 18:33:00
|
3039. CCP Rattati, an urgent request! - in General Discussions [original thread]
This weapon needs to make it into Warlords 1.0. It is critical. I don't care if you have to push the patch back a day or two. Make. This. Happen.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 18:17:00
|
3040. Diminishing Returns - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: The only place I've ever made that many WP was in PC. And that one time I played logi where there were two squads on both sides. (I've never had my needle out so often since) It's quite high. A legit, good player prob...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.01.28 17:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |