| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
341. I couldn't think of an attention grabbing title but here is what I have to s... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reduce payouts (both SP and ISK) in higher security space, then allow players to choose the range of sec levels they want to fight in. Players would want to get the best payout they can, but if they go beyond their ability they get stomped, so the...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.12 19:34:00
|
342. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: You can't understand it because you don't want to. You don't understand vehicle dynamics. This Spend a week in tanks, maybe you'll start seeing it from our side. I spend a lot of my time in tanks with 1.7. Not because...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.12 18:00:00
|
343. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Game balance? Yet you complain that a tank has more EHP than a squad of proto suits but then you say that DUST is not a battlefield simulator where realism is the most important factor yet you and all infantry are cry...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.12 17:55:00
|
344. Why is it that Morons are Always the Loudest in a Playerbase? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Why does everyone always assume that I'm here for the likes? You have more than 3000 likes, so clearly you are just posting stuff you think will be popular in order to farm them. There is simply no other reasonable explanation....
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 22:29:00
|
345. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: R F Gyro wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol its a tank you ******* idiot Of course its going to have more health ...and right here we have the problem, shown in all its glory. CCP unfortunately have to list...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 22:23:00
|
346. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: R F Gyro wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol its a tank you ******* idiot Of course its going to have more health ...and right here we have the problem, shown in all its glory. CCP unfortunately have to listen to...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 22:17:00
|
347. Why is it that Morons are Always the Loudest in a Playerbase? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Need a mirror?
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 22:14:00
|
348. PVE Gamemodes - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd imagine that CCP got half-way through a PvE implementation, then put it on ice when the new EP was brought in and said "stop all large feature development, balance and tweaks only, while I create a new roadmap". Hopefully PvE is prominent in t...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 19:12:00
|
349. rumors of a respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
jenza aranda wrote: No. Are you sure? I thought I read a bluetag post back around the time of Eve Vegas saying they were considering it.
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 19:05:00
|
350. NEW GAME MODES - Militia - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kam Elto wrote: but you're forgetting that matchmaking is still going to put the organized squads on one side and the randoms on the other. same result just crappy salvage. No pre-built squads in these matches would be the simple solution to ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 19:03:00
|
351. Soft lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Damn, that's really good actually. That info screen that you get when you log into your character? It should show the current sides fighting and who's winning/losing. Should also show who was the last winner. Yep, like it. If...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 18:47:00
|
352. NEW GAME MODES - Militia - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yep, +1 But it should be the first rung on a ladder leading to the current "everything goes" combat, and I'd suggest it is tied to the security level of the system the battle is in. Something like... 1.0 = starter fits only, no squads, zero SP+...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 18:45:00
|
353. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takron Nistrom wrote: R F Gyro wrote: You haven't actually made any argument at all there. Any one player in the game can generally solo kill any other player. Why should it be different with tanks? So by your reasoning, tanks should be ...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 18:37:00
|
354. Soft lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arx Ardashir wrote: iceyburnz wrote: Unfortunately I am not omniscient, I forgot to ask it for christamas this year. Lol, you are full of sarcasm, spite, and vitriol. I like you. But we're stealing this thread. However, I have a new ques...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 18:26:00
|
355. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lol its a tank you ******* idiot Of course its going to have more health ...and right here we have the problem, shown in all its glory. CCP unfortunately have to listen to people who believe that this is a valid g...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 18:19:00
|
356. Soft lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arx Ardashir wrote: Soft, floppy, non-threatening lore. Soft, floppy, non-threatening lore about people getting blown to bits
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:42:00
|
357. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Clearly fair enough...... Heavy Attack Vehicle is the name if i'm not mistaken Why choose one line of my post to quote, taking it out of context when, I pretty much agree with you... They should do more damage (most powerful weap...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:40:00
|
358. Why Shouldn't Tanks Be Soloed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takron Nistrom wrote: Logi Bro wrote: *sigh* This is obvious bait, yet I know other people will not recognize it as so, and this thread will blow up into a full-blown troll thread. For what it's worth, tanks should be solo'd because only o...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:37:00
|
359. Soft lore - in General Discussions [original thread]
Right now players are swamped with hundreds of systems, in dozens of constellations in numerous regions, fought over by dozens of different corporations and factions. There is so much that it all gets ignored, leaving players feeling completely di...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:35:00
|
360. The great AV debate - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheD1CK wrote: Tankers are the most powerful weapon in Dust.... fair enough No, not fair enough. One playstyle should not be inherently stronger than others. I'm happy for tanks to have more EHP and do more damage, but they need a significa...
- by R F Gyro - at 2014.01.11 14:29:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |