| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3861. Are MAVs out of the picture? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dauth Jenkins wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Ehhhhh I dont mind placeholders for vehicle variants such as Amarr/Minmatar versions, but I think reusing LAVs as an MAV might be a bit much. Though it would be hilarious if you've got 6 guy's sitting...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 17:14:00
|
3862. Are MAVs out of the picture? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ehhhhh I dont mind placeholders for vehicle variants such as Amarr/Minmatar versions, but I think reusing LAVs as an MAV might be a bit much. Though it would be hilarious if you've got 6 guy's sitting on each others shoulders in an LAV and call it...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 15:52:00
|
3863. New Sentinels? (dont be too harsh) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Drake Whiteblade wrote: I see your point yes, but what im also saying is that is they were to change the sentinel the way i see they would also add weaponry to take them down. By making it so that these sentinels would need a great amount of...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 15:48:00
|
3864. Are MAVs out of the picture? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Well Rattati had a single cell on his Vehicle doc that mentioned them, but they would require art assets which isn't on that table at the moment. So I'm guessing its a possibility in the future but I would not expect it anytime soon.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 15:45:00
|
3865. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kuruld Sengar wrote: True Adamance wrote: You will get a lot of opinion on this one and I certainly appreciate this thread of engaging the vehicle community. Do you have an idea on how many slots you are looking at returning to. That would ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 04:08:00
|
3866. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Luther Mandrix wrote: My question is are you making some HAVs the murder taxi that will be unkillable by Foot soldier AV? Im not really sure what you mean. All the listed math is using existing values. As for my suggestion, any HAV pilot wi...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 01:24:00
|
3867. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yeah I mean honestly the existing blasters in my mind....are AutoCannons. They perform like an AutoCannon should, not like how a Blaster should. Blasters should be more like shotguns or Plasma Cannons. But regardless we're straying off topic. As ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 00:13:00
|
3868. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Parity would be a wonderful thing but how well can it be achieved? Remember they aren't place holders if they are the final version....... Obviously we've spoken on this before, but for posterity sake I think vehicles ar...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.16 00:02:00
|
3869. @Rattati We need Heavy Weapon parity... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vitantur Nothus wrote: From one of the greatest games of all time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjkVOdwimU8 (Gatling Laser) I guess my issue is that a Gatling Laser isn't....really....Amarr in style. That aside, how would a Gatling Las...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 23:40:00
|
3870. Assault equipment slot - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Let me put it this way. People are always violently adamant that there should be no "Slayer Logis" performing the Assault role, so why should there be "Support Assaults" performing the Support role?
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 23:27:00
|
3871. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: This would be a good path forward if the following weren't needed first: Create racial parity for small turrets. -Assuming this is even a possibility right now given available resources
Create racial parity for LAVs...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 23:19:00
|
3872. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gunnlogi (2 Complex Hardener + 1 Complex Extender) Hardener Dowtime 45s (60s Base) Hardener Upline 30s (24s Base) Assumed Pure Shield Tanking (Atypical) Optimal Hardener eHP Cycle 60s Uptime = 5565 Shield + 1500 Armor = 7065eHP 15s Downtime...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 23:14:00
|
3873. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: True Adamance wrote: Can we refocus on Rattati's proposal. Lets not get distracted. Nope the reason people are going off on so many tangents is because there are more underlying issues that need to be address at a hig...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 23:04:00
|
3874. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bright Cloud wrote: So i assume that the valchion will get bonuses to missiles and the vayu gets the bonus to blasters. But meh for pubs people will just flock to marauders like sagaris/surya to have better survivability. I'm very wary of an...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 22:48:00
|
3875. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rattati, in general you have the over arcing concepts correct in my book. I would stress that these key issues need to tackled in order to properly implement this, and preferably in this order. Address disparity between the effectiveness of ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 22:03:00
|
3876. Buff Shields dont nerf armour. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Armor Repair Gallente Proto Assault 0 Complex Rep = 2.5 HP/s 1 Complex Rep = 11.88 HP/s 2 Complex Rep = 21.25 HP/s 3 Complex Rep = 30.63 HP/s 4 Complex Rep = 40.00 HP/s 5 Complex Rep = 49.38 HP/s Shield Recharge Caldari Proto Assault 0 Shield Ene...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 21:44:00
|
3877. Buff Shields dont nerf armour. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
PLAYSTTION wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: PLAYSTTION wrote: Armour is only more effective because they can have more hp and better reps without sacrificing much. Shield are to low and require modules to make them better. Just improve every mo...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 21:10:00
|
3878. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Cat Merc wrote: I think the generalist tanks should have more slots, while the specialized tanks get fewer. The generalists will build their tank exactly how they like it, while the specialis...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 20:55:00
|
3879. New Sentinels? (dont be too harsh) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Drake Whiteblade wrote: Jacques Cayton II wrote: Drake Whiteblade wrote: Forever ETC wrote: Sorry, but...no. They are fine as is, if anything i think their resistance bonuses need to be adjusted based on their primary tank and opposing...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 18:55:00
|
3880. Assault equipment slot - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I hate that the Scouts get 2 slots, so I certainly can't support Assaults getting the same. If you want to run more than one equipment, run a Logi, that's their role. Too many suits are multipurpose as it is, the last thing we need is more of them.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2014.12.15 18:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |