| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
21. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: lol, the uni corps are going to take over?!?! that's just shocking in concept. I'd really like to see what would occur if this enhancement was actual implemented. Truthfully, I doubt much would change beside there being more functional...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.29 19:56:00
|
22. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: but isn't the motto One Universe; One War ?? To me, that motto is merely a representation of the endgoal for DUST. As we all know, that is not the case right now; not only because of the lack of EVE/DUST integration but the lack of uni...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.29 16:01:00
|
23. Your "dream weapon" share thread! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. EMP Type Shotgun - affects sensors, optics, and suit movement but actual only causes minimal shield damage. 2. I would like a weapon that intially causes little damage per each shot but continually eats at armor or shield+armor until the afflic...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.29 14:58:00
|
24. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: One way would be Skyfire batteries, but I think most EVE players would get upset if some Dust bunnies blow up their ship in space ^^. From what I've heard, Skyfire batteries are intended to be implemented for full integration between E...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.29 14:38:00
|
25. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: I think there should be installations on the ground that are visible from eve that have quite a bit of shield, armor, and hull. They could be called clone generation units The CGU idea could work but then again that's getting into spec...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.29 06:05:00
|
26. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: Those in PC w/o EVE links need to have EVE backing to survive against those who do IMO. Otherwise there will never be a link worth establishing. At this point in DUST/EVE integration, I've heard CCP did not want any integration to be ...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.28 22:03:00
|
27. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
- First off, if Corp B (in your example) took 5 times to win the district, that's 180M to get one district. Is anyone really going to spend 180M (and 9 days explained below) getting one district? - Secondly, the EVE bombardment only covers reinfor...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.28 21:51:00
|
28. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quote: Currently the number of planets available for PC battle limits the number of systems and constellations that need to be patrolled by anyone wishing to bombard a district to reduce their clone count . To clarify, the EVE bombardment I...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.28 19:39:00
|
29. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not exactly. EVE bombardments on DUST PC districts could be countered with other EVE forces. I think there is currently more EVE ties within DUST than most realize. *Modified first post due to response above.
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.28 17:30:00
|
30. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If you guys see any flaws with my suggestion above, please reply as I am willing to address flaws and change my proposed request if seen necessary.
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.28 15:57:00
|
31. [REQUEST] PC Embargo - EVE integration for PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think it would help balance PC if EVE ships were able to destroy clone reinforcements from orbit AT ANY TIME; DUST may work in a 1 hour window but EVE does not. Now this EVE bombardment would not affect the current clone count for the bombarded ...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.08.28 15:40:00
|
32. Gathering your feedback, planetary conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What are the top 3 things you enjoy about planetary conquest? Easily playing with corp mates
Feel of owning something and being recognized
What are the top 3 things you would like to see changed? Would like to see lag as less of a fact...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.14 18:41:00
|
33. Remove Passive SP limitations - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like this idea so much, I am replying for a 2nd time.
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.11 18:30:00
|
34. [REQUEST] More Maps With Greater Diversity - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thanks for the great replies so far. I just hope CCP uses the ideas given in this thread. I love DUST and I want it to move past constantly being commented for "great potential" to "great game".
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.10 18:15:00
|
35. Remove Passive SP limitations - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yes, I like this. I do not know why my alts should suffer because I built them a long time ago before passive SP was only available for one character.
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.10 17:23:00
|
36. [Request] Another Human Endurance Event - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I personally prefer the events with ties between EVE and DUST but I am fine with anything to keep player count up. Only thing is I think Human Endurance Event would burn more players out in the long run that any thing, especially with summer here ...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.10 16:35:00
|
37. [REQUEST] More Maps With Greater Diversity - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The news of "terraforming" and "sockets" is great but I think the maps should be more diverse to keep player interest. Ways to make current maps more diverse: Floating Objectives - This is my favorite idea as would have ...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.10 15:36:00
|
38. Sticky:[Dev post] Corporation Roles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Recruiter - Differs from Personnel Director as Recruiter can only approve apps while a Personnel Director can both approve apps and remove players.
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.06.07 16:46:00
|
39. [Request] Equalizing Risk With SP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Now we all know who has the advantage between a new player with default gear and a experienced player with 12M SP also using default gear. With 12M SP, it is very likely the experienced player has levelled all of his base skills where even though ...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.05.23 21:22:00
|
40. Squad vs Squads Solo vs Solo - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DUST is a team oriented game; this is not CoD. Even if you squad with randoms and stick together, you will perform better than alone. Therefore, if you're just anti-social, expect to be taken down by those willing to team up and work together. BTW...
- by Nomed Deeps - at 2013.03.28 18:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |