| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1961. Something is wrong with the ISK gain in vehicles. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Additionally, orbital strike kills appear to award bonus ISK. So tanks are doubly penalized compared to infantry.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.08 16:15:00
|
1962. Never mind me. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Never mind me.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.08 04:42:00
|
1963. PETITION TO CCP, all look please - in General Discussions [original thread]
Boosters boost not only the rate, but the cap. So you kind of need them to achieve higher SP levels period.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 23:53:00
|
1964. Just hit SP cap - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't forget they reset it on Wednesday, so any cap started off then.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 22:59:00
|
1965. Something is wrong with the ISK gain in vehicles. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Confirmed over several days playing with and against good players. The ISK payout shooting someone with a turret is significantly lower than shooting them with a gun. I cannot pinpoint why but I have a few theories. Getting the same kills against ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 19:21:00
|
1966. >>> Ye Olde SP System <<< - in General Discussions [original thread]
The fact of the matter is progression is addicting. So there needs to be progression to hook people into playing long and often. Unfortunately they broke that a bit. They need to go to a true rested SP so the person playing continuously gets a ste...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 17:42:00
|
1967. Shouldn't Swarms take the shortest distance to the target? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Having no way to deter (note I don't demand easily destroy) at militia level air support is a fatal mistake that will lead to air spam. Again due to **** poor map design, there is no real cover from such a tactic, which leads to extremely frustrat...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 17:33:00
|
1968. Shouldn't Swarms take the shortest distance to the target? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tailss Prower wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Swarms need fixed. They should be high velocity low range. Unhittable dropships being the only effective use is a problem with the dropship design, not a reason not to fix the swarms. thats the only ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 17:05:00
|
1969. Shouldn't Swarms take the shortest distance to the target? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Swarms need fixed. They should be high velocity low range. Unhittable dropships being the only effective use is a problem with the dropship design, not a reason not to fix the swarms.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 16:27:00
|
1970. I just went 860 WP, 3rd on team, 0/0. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Return of the derpship... oh joy.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.07 04:38:00
|
1971. Heavies UP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everything with a "Heavy" moniker in this game is ridiculously under-healthed for their speed.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.03 19:05:00
|
1972. Boosting Buddy? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You do know good corps have access to lists with players names that should be avoided. Guess who just got added today, OP.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.03 19:04:00
|
1973. CCP please comment on contentious issue. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Discovering exploits in beta should be praised. To get pissy about people pointing out obvious flaws is just stupid.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.03 18:34:00
|
1974. The Inevitable Death of Dust 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
It kills a sandbox atmosphere to require certain actions in order to advance. I heard it suggested before that PVE was being considered as the place to grind out your isk (so you only PVP after grinding enough to actually pay to play). This is rig...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.03 07:26:00
|
1975. CCP this build.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Too bad the cover and maps in general is garbage...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.10.03 01:26:00
|
1976. Possible problem regarding corps next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just name it SISI_Betamax or the like. Or STB_WARRIORS if you want to be cheeky
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.09.28 18:47:00
|
1977. Issue regarding the New Dropsuits - in General Discussions [original thread]
DILLIGAD wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: crazy space wrote: It's a new deal. This is like getting mad that target is selling a VITA with a 50$ gift card, but you JUST BOUGHT a Vita 2 months ago! I DESERVE THAT GIFT CARD! No it is like launc...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.09.28 18:44:00
|
1978. Issue regarding the New Dropsuits - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space wrote: It's a new deal. This is like getting mad that target is selling a VITA with a 50$ gift card, but you JUST BOUGHT a Vita 2 months ago! I DESERVE THAT GIFT CARD! No it is like launching it with a game you want, but only i...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.09.28 18:32:00
|
1979. Issue regarding the New Dropsuits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: It was suggested the suits will be buy able with aurum. valued at 6 USD total. So if you bought an earlier merc pack spend the aurum and whallah 14 usd left over. Except, there is no option to do that and no conf...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.09.28 18:31:00
|
1980. Issue regarding the New Dropsuits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lol, it is like forcing me to buy a whole suit with tie when I just want the damn shoes. No one is arguing they can't do it. It's baffling that people just accept it as fine though.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2012.09.28 18:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |