| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1621. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tallen Ellecon wrote: gbghg wrote: Probably still stuck in the art department. This CPM stated in IRC that the art department is actually not the holdup, as revealed to them by CCP in conversations. Basically Heavy Aircraft Vehicle h...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 05:16:00
|
1622. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: So what is the problem with a heavy aircraft vehicle again? The problem was Fixed Wing Heavy Aircraft. Because high eHP and good mobility will equal invulnerability in this game. L-LAVs have pret...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 05:06:00
|
1623. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aizen Intiki wrote: xSaloLx wrote: Gunships. EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Hell no. All those guns would take so...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 04:32:00
|
1624. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
GET ATMESON wrote: darkiller240 wrote: So dropships are medium expensive paper weight, still hasent been fixed. SOON we Will have 'fighter' crafts (cheap assult dropships) wich Will be' nice But as i recently discovered the 'bomber' that we...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 04:25:00
|
1625. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't see the problem with a "Flying tank" Or heavily armored gunship. The secret advantage of Tanks and LAV's right now over dropships (other than DS being paper) is the Fact that they are on the ground. Or rather, they are constantly LOS and ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.03 04:13:00
|
1626. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: xSaloLx wrote: Gunships. EHP of a tank, lower speed than a std dropship, can't fly very high but can fit 6 small turrets (3 each side) and one large or medium turret up front. Good luck getting that through AR supremi...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 22:08:00
|
1627. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP has never even indirectly stated what their plans for Heavy Air Vehicles looks like. We have LAV, HAV, dropship (light land, heavy land, medium air) We've seen models for MAV, Speeders, Jets (Medium land, light land, light air) That leaves o...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 22:07:00
|
1628. Heavy aircraft - a LIE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: Anyone who expects fast flying aircraft to be in the heavy class with more eHp than a dropship are going to be sorely disappointing. Who said its going to be fast?
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 22:04:00
|
1629. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
steadyhand amarr wrote: As a fyi this is getting addressed in verc blance pass of 1.4 1.5, 2+ months from now. And we'll see what happens there. Hopefully before its all code locked.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 18:50:00
|
1630. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: No... I don't think they should ever balance the core stats of a suit or vehicle around its isk price. They should create and balance without even considering isk price and then come back and determine an isk price that is appr...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 18:49:00
|
1631. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Csikszent Mihalyi wrote: I think you are missing a few things: - While AV causes a lot of damage if it downs a tank, it doesn't do much anything else. It doesn't nearly have the battlefield presence that a tank has, nor does it provide nearly ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 18:48:00
|
1632. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knightshade Belladonna wrote: If we had a market and economy dictated by the players, you would see this eventually balance itself out. True. True. But we are Years out from that. In the mean time, if anyone is to keep playing this game. Som...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 12:22:00
|
1633. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Just the cost of prototype and maybe advanced infantry gear should go up. Leave everything else as it is. That's all that needs to be balanced ISK-wise. I'd actually prefer prototype gear to become salvage from PvE missions ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:47:00
|
1634. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaptein Blod wrote: So u want cheap tanks eyh? Spam the battlefield with tanks and dropships. That will be fun. Nope. Saying DS price needs to go down, or it needs to not suck. And Actually I agree with everyone here. Vehicles should be exp...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:34:00
|
1635. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 2 things will happen Either they reduce the prices so we can field more for less or they increase the prices but make the vehicle be able to take more damage I prefer paying more for a better vehicle tbh agreed....
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:25:00
|
1636. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Guess I'll be that guy, then. I don't think either dropships or tanks should be lower in price. If anything, make them more expensive, but more resilient. I wish heavies were treated in the same manner as well. I'm a fa...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:23:00
|
1637. I hear people say "The game should not be balanced around ISK" - in General Discussions [original thread]
but I think ISK should be balanced against ISK a 50,000 forge gun should not 3 shot a 1,500,000 ISK dropship. If it can, then either the price of AV needs to go up, or the price of derpships needs to go down. This is just silly. And don't eve...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 11:10:00
|
1638. Free ISK to All! (Vets) - in General Discussions [original thread]
i fly derpships. have pity on me
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 04:02:00
|
1639. What the hell!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bomber dropship =/= new content though. It's just rehashing a model and creating a huge additional SP sink. Kind of does sound "No skilly" I just dont see this being necessary or fun. I could be wrong but we'll see....
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 03:17:00
|
1640. hellstorm vs fujo update news - in General Discussions [original thread]
when uneducated people drink it turns their posts from slightly incomprehensible to entirely unintelligible
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.08.02 03:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |