| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1041. Gear based matchmaking = everyone smiles - in General Discussions [original thread]
There are two major gripes with gear based matchmaking i have: 1. Allowing players to opt out from fighting superiorly equipped players defeats the purpose of tiered gear as no one will join proto matches unless he's capable of using proto himsel...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.23 00:16:00
|
1042. [Request] Do not remove squad invite notifications after an error - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You! Yes you! Do you hate it when your favourite corp mates don't have room for you so you play a quick round of ambush to kill some time (and redberries) only to get your squad invite deleted once it's finally there because you forgot to leave ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:56:00
|
1043. CCP Logibro! Alternative solution for Logis: Require 3 equipment for valid fitting - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SponkSponkSponk wrote: three compact nanohives. Go. He actually adressed this by requiring a minimum PG/CPU used by equipment to validate the fit. Not an idea that i like too much but still...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:32:00
|
1044. 1.3 patch note - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Guys the notes will get to you soon as possible, they're aiming for a week before 1.3 release. There is a dev blog coming out this week that should a win for most folks. Thanks for the heads up.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:30:00
|
1045. Normal, AR only and No AR Matches? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: We don't have to do this, because it isn't going to happen. I know but this (if it wasn't obvious) was supposed to be a parody of the mentalitiy of the forums I wanted to try and show everyone how stup...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:26:00
|
1046. CCP Logibro! Alternative solution for Logis: Require 3 equipment for valid fitting - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Something to the same effect but much more intuitive would be a sharp nerf to CPU/PG and a corresponding fitting cost reduction for equipment. They're already working on a system that allows that kind of suit bonuses. And let's wait how the chan...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:22:00
|
1047. Normal, AR only and No AR Matches? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or we can just let everyone use whatever they want on the battlefield. Last time i checked that was the point of having a choice...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:18:00
|
1048. 1.3 patch note - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Why would they willingly feed the trolls? It doesn't matter what's in there - someone's going to find one thing missing that they demanded to be included and will shitpost about how bad the game is and write a threa...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 23:12:00
|
1049. [Request] vehicle and dropsuit fitting folders - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This has been suggested earlier and i absolutely support the idea.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 22:00:00
|
1050. Why the burst is better then the assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: I personally use the Assault Rifle variant of the HMG. It's great, trust me. Is OP talking about AR or HMG? Funny how this isn't clear at all.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 21:57:00
|
1051. Why the burst is better then the assault - in General Discussions [original thread]
DRDEEZE TWO POINTO wrote: Seriously why do peaple use the assault variant while the burst has whole lot more dps it's damage is only slightly lower but it's rof is on steroids. The assault variant is a novelty compared to the burst. You forge...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 21:54:00
|
1052. CPM: Help Wanted, Looking for Market Oddities - in General Discussions [original thread]
Comfirming STD AUR injector with PRO ISK performance as of two days ago.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 20:01:00
|
1053. More incentive to play a support role. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like some of those more than others but it's a great leap in the right direction.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 19:56:00
|
1054. [REQUEST] Ability to sell items - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
That's exactly what the announced player market will be there for. Completely player driven economy is in the works and i expect some simple item trading to take place somewhat SOONGäó.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 19:23:00
|
1055. [Request] Return of the HUD shake - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: I heard it caused nausea for some players but out of personal preference, i agree. on/off toggle through options could remedy this. Indeed. So it is decided.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 19:15:00
|
1056. [Request] Return of the HUD shake - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I heard it caused nausea for some players but out of personal preference, i agree.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 19:06:00
|
1057. A round of silence for our vets who left. - in The Locker Room [original thread]
At least you two have eyes at all...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 14:05:00
|
1058. CCp Fox wants a discussion on Eve/dust link. What do have in mind for. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Che Cortez wrote: Bounties, contract etc Similar to eve in payouts ( payout = percent of isk cost of suits/weapons) Time frame? Alternate methods, single lump sum or pool of isk etc Can set how long contact is active fo...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 12:30:00
|
1059. new game mode cqc - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: No. We don't need a mode that pilots are effectively excluded from participating effectively. We also don't need a mode that allows players to opt out of vehicle warfare, leaving pilots with just othe...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 12:17:00
|
1060. new game mode cqc - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No. We don't need a mode that pilots are effectively excluded from participating effectively. We also don't need a mode that allows players to opt out of vehicle warfare, leaving pilots with just other pilots and AV infantry. Adapt in accordance...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.07.22 11:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |