| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 |
1781. Just add purchasable respecs already - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RoundEy3 wrote: Ok at least you're looking at this for what it is. The great part about the SP penalty is since it is a % obviously the less SP you have the more this would affect you. Basically a young character who switches around often will...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 16:30:00
|
1782. Just add purchasable respecs already - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RoundEy3 wrote: Thank you for listening. I can understand the adherence to eve, but it's got to be obvious that if that is the only group that picks up DUST and continues to play it there aren't going to be the large scale battles happening a...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 16:00:00
|
1783. Just add purchasable respecs already - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RoundEy3 wrote: @ Cross Atu In post 8 I had a quite simple balanced proposal for adding a respec feature that would allow people to occasionally change battlefield roles. My goal here is simple, balance the requests for a respec while keeping t...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 15:50:00
|
1784. Just add purchasable respecs already - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RoundEy3 wrote: There is no hostility. It's my guess that the majority of people who share my opinion will not "kiss the ring" and do something else that isn't so time consuming as keeping an edge in new eden. I just want to see the battle fie...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 15:26:00
|
1785. Just add purchasable respecs already - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RoundEy3 wrote: As I stated in my earlier post here I am for a limited, non ISK/money based respec option. I say this because despite a few elitists, purists, diehards, stubborn gamers, whatever you want to call them, believe that dust should ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 15:01:00
|
1786. Optional respec-What is going on? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panther Alpha wrote: Is not clarity in anything that CCP says ...So, they'll do the Respecs when ever they feel like it ( Could be 6 months ).. Some people gets a huge advantage, when others have to wait indefinitely ? Crap like this is why th...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 14:36:00
|
1787. Optional respec-What is going on? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panther Alpha wrote: "once we deploy the changes to the skill system."- Which has already happen. Correct. That's why first respecs have been issued. Panther Alpha wrote: "Respecs will be processed in batches and applied during daily d...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 14:29:00
|
1788. Optional respec-What is going on? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panther Alpha wrote: "This offer will be available from May 14th to June 30th" "Please bear in mind that it may take a few days to process your request and enable respecs/reset on your accounts" You're quoting the mercpack account reset wi...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 14:15:00
|
1789. Scorestreaks? ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You should have called them "killstreaks" so i could say "No" just out of principle. We definitely need more crazy tools of destruction but they should be paid with ISK and nothing else. Tieing them to WP just encourages farming wich is "unnatura...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 14:02:00
|
1790. Optional respec-What is going on? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dust HaHakoke wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: They already said they're doing them in waves. Most of my friends have received there's, but some I've talked to are still waiting. It'll come. Stay calm. The problem with this is that today was s...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 13:52:00
|
1791. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: Jathniel wrote: I'm not defending the TAR so much so as I'm drawing a complaint against clunkiness of controls and TTK in CQC mechanics. The TAR, with it's current iteration, compensates for Dust's fail...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 13:46:00
|
1792. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: "CODification". lol... (English is a wonderful language isn't it. Enabling the coining of all sorts of words. Humor me more.) Lower TTK doesn't necessarily need increased regen. With Dust, both depends on *gasp* your fitting. ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 12:48:00
|
1793. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: I'm not defending the TAR so much so as I'm drawing a complaint against clunkiness of controls and TTK in CQC mechanics. The TAR, with it's current iteration, compensates for Dust's failure in both of these aspects. In it's ro...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 12:40:00
|
1794. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: The whole argument is NOT built on such a premise. It is not wrong, nor is it invalid. . Comparisons were made with BF3, not for arguing that Dust be exactly like it, but for the sake of pointing out an error in Dust. Namely c...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 12:20:00
|
1795. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: Ignoring the fact that the tactical doesn't blow up tanks, and there are a myriad other weapons that are far more potent against infantry than a tank's blasters, i'll get back on topic. Dust is a squad-based game, yes. How th...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 12:05:00
|
1796. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: IamI3rian wrote: Jathniel wrote: It's FUN to use the tactical, because you can put your enemy down fast... ...and herein lies the problem. This is a squad based game, and like it or not if you're any good you're movin...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 11:53:00
|
1797. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Balance is a relative term. If any piece of gear is better than the rest to the extend that everything else becomes useless that's the one that's broken and that's the one that requires a balance pass. Changing all the other guns leads to a s...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 11:45:00
|
1798. WHER IS THE TEMPLAR LIST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panther Alpha wrote: CCP Frame wrote: Here is the list ! I only recognize one player on that full list... How we suppose to track this guys ? - What time zone they play on ? - What is their favorite Game mode ? The chances of coming a...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 09:42:00
|
1799. IGN Review just got posted - in General Discussions [original thread]
Calroon DeVil wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: That review is basicly a free guideline for CCP on what to fix. First get the basic mechanics done instead of adding MORE GUNS/ STUFF. How stupid is that. Art, Gamedesign, And ...
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 01:53:00
|
1800. Which AR have scopes? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The burst variant should have one aswell.
- by Malkai Inos - at 2013.05.31 01:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |