| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3121. Make militia tanks standard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xander Mercy wrote: CLONE117 wrote: now y is it that the top corps/elitist players r the main ones complaining about this stuff. im fine with the way tanks r currently. ive had no problem killing them either. but what do you use to have n...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 23:52:00
|
3122. Death of MAG=Fresh ideas for Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would expect a bonus to pilot suits
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 23:42:00
|
3123. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Azri Sarum wrote: Beld Errmon wrote: They are only invincible if you are terrible, I kill tanks on foot, in the air and with other tanks, I guess it takes a tanker to kill a tanker, regardless of the tools. Considering how hard tanks are ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 23:24:00
|
3124. Schwoop Thanks For the Hellmar Sentinels CCP! - in General Discussions [original thread]
You just need ADV Sent to use them as a warbarge suit, if I recall correctly.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 22:39:00
|
3125. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beld Errmon wrote: Eberk Baldek wrote: I wouldn't be surprised if CCP eliminated the possibility of making a Jihad LAV. They obviously won't be happy until tanks are utterly invincible. Oh, wait, they ARE already totally invincible! They ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 22:34:00
|
3126. Tank modules & other things - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah, sorry, should have clarified: I've tried forging this build, and while it's still not too hard IMO, it's a bit ridiculous that it's equally hard to forge a Sica versus a Gunnlogi, since the fittings are basically the same and all revolve aro...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 15:43:00
|
3127. The Recruit SMG needs a boost - in General Discussions [original thread]
ResistanceGTA wrote: Soldier Sorajord wrote: Just Really Frustrating To Have a weapon with a false description, and it being even worse than the Militia SMG :( Boundless Remote Explosives, supposedly have a larger blast radius, but, they ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 15:30:00
|
3128. Tank modules & other things - in General Discussions [original thread]
The issue seems to be more that it's as difficult for infantry AV to destroy an MLT fit tank as it is a Cx fit tank (for a short period of time, at least). The fact that a Sica has near as high resistance and potential EHP as a high quality Gunnl...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 15:25:00
|
3129. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awesome Pantaloons wrote: If tankers can exploit militia gear to take control of the battlefield, honest infantry should be able to pack a car full of C4 and take it back. REs should remain sticky and be able to stick to anything. Red vehicles ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 15:20:00
|
3130. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beld Errmon wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Piraten Hovnoret wrote: There is a post buy a dev somewhere about the RE sticking to lavs/tanks etc is a unintended flaw in the programming how is it a flaw when it wa...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 15:07:00
|
3131. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeeeuuuupppp wrote: I... I just want to kill a tank with 3 re's that stuck to him. That's it. I can care less about jihad jeeps (as I rarely tank). I tank most of the time. I still couldn't care less.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 14:22:00
|
3132. Railgun vs Blaster turret - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: Railgun is primarily anti-tank, with minimal anti-infantry capability thanks to the difficulty of hitting a small moving target. Blaster is primarily anti-infantry, but still viable for hurting vehicles, even if it's li...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 14:15:00
|
3133. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Piraten Hovnoret wrote: There is a post buy a dev somewhere about the RE sticking to lavs/tanks etc is a unintended flaw in the programming how is it a flaw when it was done on purpose? also jihad jeeps are a sympt...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 14:12:00
|
3134. Welcome to a New Era - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: I hope you like having several more likes than previously... you b*stard. On an entirely unrelated note, I know the names of some attractive females I can give you; being summer they're not ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 10:52:00
|
3135. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I actually think it's an awesome tactic; jihad jeeps guarantee a dead clone, the loss of some ISK, and aren't too difficult to counter. It's certainly the most efficient way to deal with my douchebag permahardened tank. NK Scout wrote: Sinbo...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 10:50:00
|
3136. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why is it wrong, exactly? Do you mean not intended by the devs, or in your opinion?
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 10:20:00
|
3137. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can you link it to me? Or tell me which Dev so I can find it? I would be desperately disappointed if it were removed. If it's a flaw, then by all means fix it, but please put it back in legitimately! It's an awesome tactic, as much as it makes m...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 10:13:00
|
3138. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
LEHON Xeon wrote: Rumor I heard was that jihad jeeps will no longer be viable in 1.8 Something supposed to happen with REs. This better stay a rumour, CCP.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 10:07:00
|
3139. Welcome to a New Era - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: l''l wrote: True Adamance wrote: l''l wrote: Oh there so mad . Apparently they've been getting blown up alot.these awesome tankers. They're mate its they're LoL. Oh so witty. P...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 10:06:00
|
3140. Welcome to a New Era - in General Discussions [original thread]
l''l wrote: True Adamance wrote: l''l wrote: Oh there so mad . Apparently they've been getting blown up alot.these awesome tankers. They're mate its they're LoL. Oh so witty. Perhaps you're from the U.K ? Maybe Australia ? Yes ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2014.01.28 09:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |