| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
4001. If you saw CCP dev in a match-What would you do? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would ensure that they died, even if it meant hauling them into the redline in front of my friendly tank. There is no price too high for sheer amusement!
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.30 13:48:00
|
4002. Community bias and its reinforcement through official actions. - in General Discussions [original thread]
GG, CCP. Inb4lock.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.30 13:47:00
|
4003. Lock your vehicle GTA visits Dust 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Holy wall of text, Batman! Please use paragraphs. I tried reading it but my eyes just blurred about halfway through :(
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.30 12:43:00
|
4004. 1.5 squad locking vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: some more brain-sperg Not seen this guy make a post that isn't 'hurr durr tanks r bad'. Don't expect to.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.30 11:09:00
|
4005. Why is Squad Vision being removed? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, now the active scanner is the only way to get squad vision. I imagine it's an indirect buff to stealthy play styles.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.30 07:47:00
|
4006. MAV - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Enforcer is the tank destroyer. Marauder will probably be the infantry support vehicle when it comes back. MAV will probably be a logi and transport vehicle.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.29 12:44:00
|
4007. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Acturus Galaxy wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: Just saw Jason Pearson in a skirmish match I was AFKing in, he was in his gunnlogi (solo tanking from what I could tell). Figured I would share the post-match results, w...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.29 12:43:00
|
4008. CCP progess since fan fest announcements - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't forget, after FanFest he community basically had a tantrum. And CCP changed their roadmap as a result. As such, I count it a good thing (to an extent) that most of those things are no longer on the table. I mean, bomber dropships? WTF?
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.29 12:14:00
|
4009. Tankers do have it pretty hard. - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol. I can tell you exactly how much AV there was that match: one Soma with a missile turret. With two tanks rolling around on our side. Get down onto the battlefield next time. EDITed cos I'm apparently unable to spell.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.29 07:20:00
|
4010. New way to troll blue dots - in General Discussions [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: we need a way to blow up friendly lav's, I wish to troll as well. We do. It's called an HAV
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 21:06:00
|
4011. Vehicle Weaponry (Removing Advanced and Prototype Turrets) - in General Discussions [original thread]
One thing I've noticed about Pearson's posts is that whether or not I agree with him, they're always thought provoking. Also, I like this idea, though I would miss my Particle Cannon.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 12:13:00
|
4012. looking at the notes so far, anyone still want to be a tanker? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I guess we'll have to just 'adapt or die'. I anticipate a lot of dying while I adapt. So help me, I still want to spend more SP on my tracked coffin.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 11:12:00
|
4013. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote: That's fine. When I spawn in my AV and blow up your supply depot's come 1.5 I'll simply say.. "I didn't want the tankers refilling their ammo supplies." That'll be what I'm saying as I do the same with my rail! M...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 11:04:00
|
4014. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah, can you imagine the infantry QQ if a Duvolle did 50 damage per shot, versus my Exile's 34, all before skills? That's the equivalent.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 10:31:00
|
4015. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah infantry, basically, get buggered. I quite like not dying.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 01:04:00
|
4016. Vehicle ammunition changes in 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I am slightly concerned about these changes. When playing infantry, I have a stock of two nanohives at least, and there's always another two in my squad at the very least. In conjunction with the far lesser penalties for dying, I don't run out o...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 01:03:00
|
4017. Vehicle ammunition changes in 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can't quote it unfortunately (iPhone) but it's in Wolfman's post about changes coming in 1.5. It's in a tl;dr at the end, as well as being explored in greater detail earlier in the piece. EDIT: I can link it for others' reference, though.
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 00:58:00
|
4018. Vehicle ammunition changes in 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
From what it seems, the only way to restore ammunition is with supply depots, unless CCP is inviting us tankers to abuse recall. Seems like destroying supply depots will become a viable AV tactic; nuke the one in the redline and have a sniper sta...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 00:53:00
|
4019. My take on 1.5 (what we have heard so far) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: low genius wrote: i'm quite happy with it. tanks that blow up supply depots are clueless. actually it serves a purpose, that way you infantry cant switch to AV anytime you want. Yep. Potentially, it'll be more useful ...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 00:49:00
|
4020. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: The original intent of the developers was to create a risk vs reward scenario to balance the tiered dropsuits and vehicle frames, its clear however that this does not work. Of course it won't work, bec...
- by Lorhak Gannarsein - at 2013.08.28 00:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |