| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
561. 99 Problems and Dust Ain't 1 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Low isk payouts? Try getting more warpoints per match then. When you start rolling in at least 1000 wp in a match you'll probably earn at least 170k. On a good match I tend to earn 300k. That's not low.
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.18 14:51:00
|
562. HMG's should do 100% damage to tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, they should not. Heavy dropsuits already have an anti-tank weapon. It's called: Forge gun...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.18 14:44:00
|
563. 20 mill sp player "Me" thinks this game is broken - in General Discussions [original thread]
Doesnt matter how many skillpoints you have in your assault rifle skills if you cant aim properly. And im not saying that in an attempt at being condescending, because the assault rifle is a pretty hard weapon to master (speaking from experience ...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.18 00:14:00
|
564. if a tank should only be killed by a tank..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talryn Vilneram wrote: I was actually thinking the same thing. I think tanks are spammed because they are difficult to kill, they have a fairly low ISK investment and can kill ANYTHING. I think the main turrets should only be able to kill a s...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 22:38:00
|
565. Look, there's only one way to truly counter the "tank spam", and i... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Listen, if the opposing team are tank spamming then you need to capitalize more on it. Lets say there are five tanks on the opposing team. That means that at LEAST five members of the opposing team are unable to engage in any kind of hacking (unle...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 21:19:00
|
566. I find it highly amusing how reliant people are on scanners - in General Discussions [original thread]
Never even used a scanner. Don't really see the point. I mean, I've got eyes to see with. I might try them out if the upcoming cloaking device rumors are true, but until then I don't need them.
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 18:45:00
|
567. Ever Get Those Games Where You Think "what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
sira draco wrote: Niuvo wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: So I'm against 3 corps with only randoms on my side. We have no choice but to run 300m to the next objective on open ground, the enemy have us scanned 100s of metres away so they know ...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 17:04:00
|
568. Ever Get Those Games Where You Think "what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
sira draco wrote: abarkrishna wrote: Step one skill into profile dampening. Step two. Use profile dampeners. If that does not work you could always resort to step three. Step three. Play a different game because you clearly are not cut fo...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 12:34:00
|
569. Ever Get Those Games Where You Think "what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
drake sadani wrote: i will often times say boohoo get better . but when a imbalance that ruins the game for new players crops up. it needs to be addressed . if it is not then you just shoot yourself in the foot. the response quit crying wi...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 12:28:00
|
570. Ever Get Those Games Where You Think "what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seriously? Your reply is: "they were scanning me, boohoohoo"? You got owned, and you made tactical errors. Deal with it and get smarter.
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.17 01:37:00
|
571. Ever Get Those Games Where You Think "what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seems to me that its more like your tactics were off rather than the game being "wrong". 1. Running over open ground and in plain sight will ALWAYS be dangerous (it's dangerous in real world war zones too). By not sticking to cover and letting yo...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.16 22:16:00
|
572. What do you believe to be the best suit? - in General Discussions [original thread]
"Sever" Logistics. Because thats my main suit, and since its bpo it doesnt cost me anything to lose. I tend to always get at least 1000 warpoints in any match using the Sever. So I got some grounds to elect it to be one of the best suits in the g...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.16 19:46:00
|
573. How do Amarr, Caldari see? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually... We cant see sh*t in these masks. Thats why we cant hit anything.
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 23:48:00
|
574. i'm sorry, I'm a fangirl. looking for channels, discussions. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why not start one of your own? Make it a rule that it has to be an active chatterbox of a channel and silent types get booted out.
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 23:46:00
|
575. Thats it. I quit. Tank spam is unbearable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Doctor-Jeep wrote: Leonid Tybalt wrote: BUT this thread to me is only a testament to someone being butthurt over not having spent their skillpoints wisely. So....spending your SP wisely in a FPS is putting your points into TANK skills? ...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 23:15:00
|
576. Thats it. I quit. Tank spam is unbearable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Hyperthraz wrote: Leonid Tybalt wrote: Michael Hyperthraz wrote: So fighting against 10 65k mlt tanks is just ok. Noted. Infantry just for hacking. Noted. Game was never pure infantry vs infantry, but it is almost pure tanks vs ...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 22:54:00
|
577. Thats it. I quit. Tank spam is unbearable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Hyperthraz wrote: So fighting against 10 65k mlt tanks is just ok. Noted. Infantry just for hacking. Noted. Game was never pure infantry vs infantry, but it is almost pure tanks vs tanks now. Just go do ambush or domination and see it...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 21:53:00
|
578. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: [quote=Alena Ventrallis]Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily coordin...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 15:52:00
|
579. Thats it. I quit. Tank spam is unbearable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Hyperthraz wrote: Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Michael Hyperthraz wrote: I will be back when tank spamming problem will be solved. Im no longer interested playing against full team of unkillable mlt tanks. If something is twic...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 15:43:00
|
580. Thats it. I quit. Tank spam is unbearable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Get into a tank yourself then and take those tank spammers down? When I got my sp previously invested in tanking back I immediately spent it on the new tank skills and whipped up a decent Madrugar fit. And let's just say that cheap ass Sicas and...
- by Leonid Tybalt - at 2013.12.14 14:05:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |