| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2641. Tomorrow... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm afraid I have a prior engagement and am not available until Wednesday, my brothers, but if this offensive lasts through the week I will see you on the field of battle!
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.07 22:53:00
|
2642. Eve strikes are awesome. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kristoff Atruin wrote: Speaking of laser strikes...I want to see a beam laser strike. Something like beams that move across the ground randomly for a few seconds with some aoe damage and will track towards vehicles or enemy installations if the...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.07 22:06:00
|
2643. Why do people think logistics are suppose to be medics? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Athena Sentinel wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Just because they can carry multiple equipment, doesn't mean they are suppose to carry a nano injector or repair tool. Uplinks and nanohives are just as important. Plus the ONLY logistics suit th...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.07 12:19:00
|
2644. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: yeah we do lol respec is their only option they are the one's that removed the closed beta tag ona unfinished game,...they're are aur vehicles and modules and people who posses them...and that means that money needs to be ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.07 02:24:00
|
2645. Best matchmaker evar!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: Actually, you could argue that it was excellent matchmaking, if you put Duna and 13ear on one team and the rest are basically randoms, it really should be 3 vs 12. You don't get a plus 1 because...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.06 19:52:00
|
2646. so about respecs - in General Discussions [original thread]
No. Logibro has stated that CCP is still considering their options. We don't need another 20 page thread on this.
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.06 16:35:00
|
2647. Why do you people want to nerf the logistics class? - in General Discussions [original thread]
BLACKSTAR AND TSUBAKI wrote: equipment WP is too dam high this is a fps dammit killing is #1 i love my logis but when i go 14/4 and they do 1/3 and top the board it itches my ass I'm going to be optimistic and assume that's sarcasm, and use ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.06 15:25:00
|
2648. Best matchmaker evar!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually, you could argue that it was excellent matchmaking, if you put Duna and 13ear on one team and the rest are basically randoms, it really should be 3 vs 12.
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.06 04:01:00
|
2649. What should I spec into next? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gotta go with Checkmate. Always max out the passives first, or at least to level 4, then maybe think about other priorities and go back later (only a little later though). Not maxing out my passives earlier is the biggest mistake I ever made in my...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.06 03:52:00
|
2650. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Judgment wrote: all of you people opposing respec's do realize what they're doing to the vehicle skill tree right? they're removing vehicle roles such as the logi and assault dropship : what exactly do you want to happen to sp inves...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 20:04:00
|
2651. Trading dust Items from EVE collectors edition. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah, I want some Templar action but I was going to go the eBay route myself. Safer.
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 16:25:00
|
2652. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: Wow, you said it twice, so that must be the greatest argument ever. Once someone resorts to the sky is falling tactic, with nothing else to support their opinion, their role in the discussion end...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 16:17:00
|
2653. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Wow, you said it twice, so that must be the greatest argument ever. Once someone resorts to the sky is falling tactic, with nothing else to support their opinion, their role in the discussion ends as far as I'm concerned. Aero, I personally don'...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 12:17:00
|
2654. Why do you people want to nerf the logistics class? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rusty Shallows wrote: John Demonsbane wrote: I sometimes wonder if people think there is a finite amount of WP/SP to be given in each match and somehow if we go negative but still get 1500 WP we are stealing points from them. That's the most...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 12:05:00
|
2655. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: PEW JACKSON wrote: Respecs would help diversity. You obviously don't understand FOTM and DUST.... and it makes me sad that you make long post's. I know, right? The example doesn't even make sense, how are respecs go...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 04:22:00
|
2656. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
PEW JACKSON wrote: Oh but wait! You can re specialize in a matter of weeks/ months if you grind and cap out every chance you get.... New players look at this like "WTF?", then leave. This game needs monthly respecs that cost $5-10 worth of ...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 04:18:00
|
2657. Why do you people want to nerf the logistics class? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I sometimes wonder if people think there is a finite amount of WP/SP to be given in each match and somehow if we go negative but still get 1500 WP we are stealing points from them. That's the most amusing QQ, WTF U DYED MOAR Y U GET POINTZ?
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 04:03:00
|
2658. If (when) there's a respec, why it should be a full respec instead of a part... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have a very difficult time understanding this mentality. Seriously, WTF do you need 4 respecs for? Or 8 or 15 or whatever number will make you people happy? It doesn't make any sense. The whole point of this game is to learn/adapt, build and pro...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.05 03:45:00
|
2659. please sign if you think tactical pack is JUNK - in General Discussions [original thread]
Signed. Maybe if you stick another zero at the end of the aurum. Only maybe.
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.04 02:23:00
|
2660. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: As far as partial respecs/refunds for vehicle related stuff goes, they are on the table. No details yet, but that's because we're still discussing how we want to do it. We will let you know when we've d...
- by John Demonsbane - at 2013.10.04 00:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |