| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
801. shield energizers take too much cpu, feedback welcomed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: I feel that regulators, rechargers and energizers ALL cost too much in terms of fitting requirements. Fun fact Shield regulator cpu requirement was raised in hotfix bravo.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 21:58:00
|
802. Dear Rattati, Can Suits' Slot Layouts Be Changed in Hotfix Charl... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Can and will, I just came out of a Charlie meeting. Keep an eye out for new updates. Well, I hope you plan on adding slots to assault without taking something away, they need it.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 21:47:00
|
803. 47/4 with a Mass Driver? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: http://imgur.com/eOB8a2A Before you all yell at me, apparently I had my Freedom in the "secondary" slot of the commando instead of the primary one so the scrambler showed up as the "favorite" weapon. I use the scrambler to wea...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 21:27:00
|
804. shield energizers take too much cpu, feedback welcomed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote: JRleo jr wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: hfderrtgvcd wrote: JRleo jr wrote: So, as we all know, shield energizers take a bit too mich cpu, I propose they get thier cpu needed to fit by say, 20? On most tiers. ...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 21:08:00
|
805. Give assaults a rate of fire buff - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: JRleo jr wrote: That needs to come with an ammo increase as the rail rifle has low ammo if not against militia or shield suits. no ammo increase. There is enough ammo in each gun to kill stuff. Its just not quick enou...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:53:00
|
806. Give assaults a rate of fire buff - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
That needs to come with an ammo increase as the rail rifle has low ammo if not against militia or shield suits.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:45:00
|
807. Hotfix Charlie - Update - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Would the people please stop trying to give assaults a fitting bonus to armor/shield extenders please? This wont solve the issue that they cannot kill a heavy quickly before it turns on his HMG to drill you with plenty of ...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:44:00
|
808. Remove the extra equitment slot off of Scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
emm kay wrote: how about we drop the equipment slot on the minmatar suit and add an extra sidearm. How about.....um......how do I say this No.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:39:00
|
809. Remove the extra equitment slot off of Scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doctor Day wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: No!!! You just have a bad streak of poopy teammates YESH!!! Plus they keep stealling my job of being a uplink logi! By spamming more 15 second crappy uplinks! DEY TOOK HIS JERB!
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:30:00
|
810. Remove the extra equitment slot off of Scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doctor Day wrote: They keep half assing logi work! Its really annoying..... http://i.imgur.com/a3Lx7EP.gif
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:29:00
|
811. shield energizers take too much cpu, feedback welcomed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: hfderrtgvcd wrote: JRleo jr wrote: So, as we all know, shield energizers take a bit too mich cpu, I propose they get thier cpu needed to fit by say, 20? On most tiers. But they take up zero pg and give a massive ...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 12:23:00
|
812. shield energizers take too much cpu, feedback welcomed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: JRleo jr wrote: aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote: JRleo jr wrote: Boot Booter wrote: Actually I think they're are OK. The basic provides a good bonus for pretty cheap. It scales up from there. 90 cpu for complex is o...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 11:33:00
|
813. [WTF] you can melee from cloak - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectre-M wrote: Try it. Pack on some Myofibrils and go nuts. Is this working as intended? If you can't see the cloak glow like a forge charing...welll...............
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 08:51:00
|
814. Railgun nerfed too much? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: THUNDERGROOVE wrote: shaman oga wrote: Just hit a heavy and he survived, it was a militia rail, but god damn, it's a f***** rail, heavies can't survive a direct hit. Well this game is turning into another...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 07:37:00
|
815. [REQUEST] JLAV removal. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: JLAVs were introduced in 1.7 as an apparently unintended byproduct of the change to REs. At the time the vehicle armour hardeners all but prevented dangerous damage being dealt to HAVs; this left the JLAV, usually stack...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 05:01:00
|
816. Hotfix Charlie - Update - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: I would like to remind everyone that: CCP Rattati wrote: This is the narrative and any, all or none of the ideas may end up being implemented. Please keep your feedback as constructive as possible, and we will listen. :)...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 04:18:00
|
817. Assault CPU/PG weapon reduction bonus should include grenades. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Yeah! I could save like 2 CPU on my assault suit! What a huge buff! You don't math too much do you? Even if it's just a few CPU and PG every little bit helps. The bonus just needs increasing.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 02:57:00
|
818. Assault CPU/PG weapon reduction bonus should include grenades. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Title. That's all. Do I really need to explain myself here? No. Thank you for your time. Or a bigger bonus.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 02:25:00
|
819. shield energizers take too much cpu, feedback welcomed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote: JRleo jr wrote: Boot Booter wrote: Actually I think they're are OK. The basic provides a good bonus for pretty cheap. It scales up from there. 90 cpu for complex is outrageous, and needs a slight reduction, I ca...
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 01:04:00
|
820. shield energizers take too much cpu, feedback welcomed. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Boot Booter wrote: Actually I think they're are OK. The basic provides a good bonus for pretty cheap. It scales up from there. 90 cpu for complex is outrageous, and needs a slight reduction, I can only fit energizers above std on my sentinel.
- by JRleo jr - at 2014.07.11 00:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |