| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Changes to keep PC from being ruled by a few players - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RemingtonBeaver wrote: Free Beers wrote: This is terrible Idea. You should be banned from the forums for 2 weeks as punishment. You don't even try. Troll Harder. -1 I was just telling the truth man.
- by Free Beers - at 2014.04.12 15:06:00
|
2. Changes to keep PC from being ruled by a few players - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is terrible Idea. You should be banned from the forums for 2 weeks as punishment.
- by Free Beers - at 2014.04.12 05:54:00
|
3. Reduce speed while backpeddling - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
First and foremost ccp doesn't need to nerf movement we have gone full circle in 2 years. Started with good movement to **** and back to good again. There is absolutely no reason for back peddle to change. The first week in 1.8 my scout toon with...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.04.09 05:01:00
|
4. one year ago at fan fest ... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TL:DW here is a whole lot of stuff that we will not do in the next year because we are a terrible game dev company
- by Free Beers - at 2014.03.09 07:52:00
|
5. The Amarr Assault : a focused examination. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: Talos Alomar wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Unfortunately we didn't get a chance to redo the slots and PG/CPU for all the medium frames in Uprising 1.8. Expect those changes to come in a future update. Oh, well. Awesome. ...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.03.06 20:25:00
|
6. Well done CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
breakin stuff have you not played against any ccp peeps in dust? They tank spam. They are like Nyain San but noobish. There is no reason to expect otherwise at this point in time. CCP is frankly terrible at balance and no improvement in the futur...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.03.06 20:22:00
|
7. planetary betrayal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You can betray all you want. Stop being lazy and expecting ccp to give you an easy way. Pretty sure you can spy and tk in PC now. Kids these days shesh, just want everything handed to them. I remember the old days when you had to spy and awox to ...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.03 04:20:00
|
8. [Feedback] PC is absolute trash. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You need to lay off the coffee, it's a hell of a drug.
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.03 03:57:00
|
9. Request:FOTM kdr swap - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I want my click back.
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.03 03:55:00
|
10. [Request] Allow Dust CEOs to create alliances - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: Free Beers wrote: Fire of Prometheus wrote: Free Beers wrote: Not going to happen. Per CCP alliances are not core to dust and the functionality already exists in Eve if you really want to create one. Given...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.02 19:25:00
|
11. [Request] Allow Dust CEOs to create alliances - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SILENTSAM 69 wrote: We need so much more alliance support in DUST... I do agree there could be a bit more alliance stuff dust side but only if its needed for game play. At the moment there really isn't a need.
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.02 19:14:00
|
12. [Request] Allow Dust CEOs to create alliances - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: Free Beers wrote: Not going to happen. Per CCP alliances are not core to dust and the functionality already exists in Eve if you really want to create one. Given that most established corps in dust are in Eve cr...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.02 19:13:00
|
13. [Request] Allow Dust CEOs to create alliances - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not going to happen. Per CCP alliances are not core to dust and the functionality already exists in Eve if you really want to create one. Given that most established corps in dust are in Eve created alliances already there is no real reason to spe...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.02.02 18:48:00
|
14. CCP we want parity in DUST514 and EVE, not special protections... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RAider Vherikor wrote: Free Beers wrote: We have known about this for over a year that dust was not getting share visibility or functionality. So why are you crying about it now? I tried to explain that when ccp added dust corps they piggy ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.11.10 22:18:00
|
15. CCP we want parity in DUST514 and EVE, not special protections... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RAider Vherikor wrote: G Torq wrote: RAider Vherikor wrote: (lots of blablabla) Dear RAider (sic), You are failing to understand that, at least for now, Dust514 and EVE Online are 2 separate games, even if they share backend component...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.11.10 21:32:00
|
16. CCP we want parity in DUST514 and EVE, not special protections... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RAider Vherikor wrote: Free Beers wrote: RAider Vherikor wrote: Free Beers wrote: While a valid complaint you wont see any changes in behavior by ccp. You have to remember that ccp never intended to put corps into dust in the first pla...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.11.10 19:08:00
|
17. CCP we want parity in DUST514 and EVE, not special protections... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RAider Vherikor wrote: Free Beers wrote: While a valid complaint you wont see any changes in behavior by ccp. You have to remember that ccp never intended to put corps into dust in the first place. The idea was that we were mercs and would w...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.11.10 18:10:00
|
18. CCP we want parity in DUST514 and EVE, not special protections... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
While a valid complaint you wont see any changes in behavior by ccp. You have to remember that ccp never intended to put corps into dust in the first place. The idea was that we were mercs and would work for eve corps. CCP changed course late in c...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.11.10 17:48:00
|
19. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Friendly fire will be enabled.
You will gain standings to corporations for winning matches.
You will lose standings for team killing players.
The higher your standings the higher your ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.10.18 20:04:00
|
20. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
FoxIV Remember you want to motivate players to play continuously not just till they max their standings. Also it will add to the player market with better built in supply and demand aspects 1. Add standings tick down 2. remove booster that stops...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.10.18 18:47:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |