| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
261. Daily Discussion: Snipers Are Bad, Mkay - in General Discussions [original thread]
Asha Starwind wrote: Dude, why'd you reply it's got troll post written all over it. Don't feed. It's not a troll post. If you cant discuss things you can go back to the kiddie table
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 21:10:00
|
262. FW standings should NOT be based on wins and loses - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: Free Beers wrote: stlcarlos989 wrote: Free Beers wrote: 2 days ago i afk'd for minmatar in afternoon and won 16 of 18 matches. All i ever do is drop 3 uplinks by home point to farm some wp then i go hide in corner. ...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 20:49:00
|
263. Daily Discussion: Snipers Are Bad, Mkay - in General Discussions [original thread]
Full Disclaimer: I have a sniper toon, I red line camp, and I even sniped from mcc with damage mod suit when the shield could be shot thru. I have been a terrible sniper in every other fps games I played, but dust is easy mode. I have come to the...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 20:45:00
|
264. FW standings should NOT be based on wins and loses - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: Free Beers wrote: 2 days ago i afk'd for minmatar in afternoon and won 16 of 18 matches. All i ever do is drop 3 uplinks by home point to farm some wp then i go hide in corner. Yep the FW system is severely broken, AFK...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 20:22:00
|
265. FW standings should NOT be based on wins and loses - in General Discussions [original thread]
2 days ago i afk'd for minmatar in afternoon and won 16 of 18 matches. All i ever do is drop 3 uplinks by home point to farm some wp then i go hide in corner.
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 19:36:00
|
266. FW standings should NOT be based on wins and loses - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: Free Beers wrote: Jacques Cayton II wrote: Free Beers wrote: Winning matters. If you want to just be rewarded for showing up you can play pubs. This isn't going to change so best not lose You don't play for Amarr ...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 16:20:00
|
267. FW standings should NOT be based on wins and loses - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jacques Cayton II wrote: Free Beers wrote: Winning matters. If you want to just be rewarded for showing up you can play pubs. This isn't going to change so best not lose You don't play for Amarr or Caldari do you-_- I play for all 4 fa...
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 15:47:00
|
268. FW standings should NOT be based on wins and loses - in General Discussions [original thread]
Winning matters. If you want to just be rewarded for showing up you can play pubs. This isn't going to change so best not lose
- by Free Beers - at 2014.01.01 15:38:00
|
269. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
iliel wrote: Let me reiterate. The solution to Team Deploy (i.e., the problem of teams of slayers stomping random noobs) is to add levels to FW contracts. This can be done if and only if one loses levels by losing battles. Such losses would d...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.31 19:33:00
|
270. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
BursegSardaukar wrote: I honestly would just shoot anyone not in my fleet that was on the beacon regardless of who they were bombarding for, so my bombardment guys would have less competition as they go to pull the trigger. I don't really ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.31 19:15:00
|
271. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
BursegSardaukar wrote: Free Beers wrote: BursegSardaukar wrote: Remove LP payouts if the player/corp/alliance isn't a member of FW, let them choose a side when they connect to the district, then flag them as suspect for as long as...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.31 18:54:00
|
272. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
BursegSardaukar wrote: Remove LP payouts if the player/corp/alliance isn't a member of FW, let them choose a side when they connect to the district, then flag them as suspect for as long as they are connected. It solves all problems. ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.31 18:40:00
|
273. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
BursegSardaukar wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Great thread, and really interesting to see the results of this. I agree 100% we need to do 2 big things to give this the flexibility it deserves. 1. Team Deploy, we've always wanted it, we havn't...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.31 18:26:00
|
274. [BUG][CCP IMPORTANT] - in General Discussions [original thread]
PC needs to be turned off as its just isk farmers. Also welcome to 9 months ago when we told ccp this would happen :-)
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 23:27:00
|
275. The Terrestrial Trading Consortium of New Eden - in General Discussions [original thread]
now why didnt i think of this scam
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 22:47:00
|
276. I'm kind of shocked nobody has started hiring mercs for FW... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Caldari paid us, to bad ccp hates eve players that want to actually form a real link with dust mercs to accomplish something real in fw. What i find say is I have a bunch of toons and the ones that afk for gallente and minmatar have much higher s...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 22:45:00
|
277. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Regis Blackbird wrote: This is my two ISK on the topic. We have a wonderful star map, so let's use it. What about the following: EVE can set up attack or defense contracts based on region (or perhaps constellations) - The ISK put into these c...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 22:41:00
|
278. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Absolute Idiom II wrote: All this focus on specific ideas (team deploy, choosing where to attack, etc) and how exactly to implement them is pointless. Where is the vision from the relevant CCP staff about injecting the MMO into the lobby FPS t...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 22:19:00
|
279. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Smooth Assassin wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: Great thread, and really interesting to see the results of this. I agree 100% we need to do 2 big things to give this the flexibility it deserves. 1. Team Deploy, we've always wanted it, we havn't...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 20:10:00
|
280. Dear Team True Grit: 1.8 FW Changes needed - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: Yep, this is why the old corp contracts had to go. It's the new eden way "When you cant win, loose" For ever to be known as "pulling a shad" Yea I am still pissed that you turned mercs into farmers nullarbor because a ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.12.30 18:03:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |