| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1081. Poll Vehicles vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
1:B That's mostly it
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:46:00
|
1082. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: There is only one true solution to this crisis we are facing. Tankers think we will stay still and they will enjoy the game in its current state for a long period b...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:43:00
|
1083. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: speed is only 1 issue which is in our faces at the moment. wait till its fixed and the main issue will be that tanks and especially dropships are still almost indestructible. if 3 proto swarms with stacked damage mods cant ta...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:40:00
|
1084. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
HEY, WE WANT BALANCE TOO!!!!!
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:35:00
|
1085. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I honestly don't mind jihad lavs much, their fun to use/shoot at. You should also give it a few days so people can figure out av tactics, cause right now the same old stand on top of tower and shoot ...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:31:00
|
1086. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I honestly don't mind jihad lavs much, their fun to use/shoot at. You should also give it a few days so people can figure out av tactics, cause right now the same old stand on top of tower and shoot tank...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:29:00
|
1087. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I honestly don't mind jihad lavs much, their fun to use/shoot at. You should also give it a few days so people can figure out av tactics, cause right now the same old stand on top of tower and shoot tank till it dies tactic doesnt work. Also not ...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:22:00
|
1088. Dear AVers, thank you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: So tell me, genius, which is the "proper" weapon to use against shield Vehicles? Oh that's right there isn't one aside from the lolplasmacannon. You laugh but it can actually deals a considerable amount of damage. Also,...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:18:00
|
1089. FW Orbitals are utterly broken beyond belief - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: So seriously, how long do we all think they should have to respond? There is a timeout system already and from memory it will currently hang around for 60 seconds. 15 seconds max, thats the time it takes for a team to cha...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:11:00
|
1090. Tankers a warning - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ivy Zalinto wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Ivy Zalinto wrote: Jammer Jalapeno wrote: Tanks are fine...I'm still blowing em up no problem. I find they are more vulnerable now actually. Played you guys earlier. Very fun match. And thank...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:07:00
|
1091. Tankers a warning - in General Discussions [original thread]
throw on av and kill them
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 05:04:00
|
1092. Teamwork For One, And Teamwork For All. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Because Patrick57 is right. Besides, infantry still does most of the killing on the battlefield. Can't kill a tank? hide from it!!! (or jihad lav it, your choice) Jihad LAV it huh? Funny how I tried that,...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 04:59:00
|
1093. Another Tank Thread! - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I've said this before buy HAV should have massively devastating and highly power main battle canon for anti tank combat, while small turrets are used by gunners to take down infantry. Now that's an idea (sort of). We alre...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:51:00
|
1094. Is hiding from a tank Camping an Objective - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's neither: It's hilarious
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:48:00
|
1095. Initial 1.7 thoughts so far on AV vs V - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: V vs V is near perfect right now cept for the lol extra 0 on milita overdrives The same applies to AV vs V and is the cause of all QQ right now lol. I am also happy to s...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:41:00
|
1096. Initial 1.7 thoughts so far on AV vs V - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: AV vs V is near perfect right now cept for the lol extra 0 on milita overdrives The cause of all QQ right now lol. I am also happy to see infantry man being ok with tanks :D ... But yea, I don't even kill infantry that...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:34:00
|
1097. Teamwork For One, And Teamwork For All. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Patrick57 wrote: Because Tanks are what Heavies should be like. It should take more than one person to take down both a tank and a Heavy. Bro, do you even CreoDron Shotgun? Or Scout? Bro, do you even Dust 514?
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:31:00
|
1098. Teamwork For One, And Teamwork For All. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Because Patrick57 is right. Besides, infantry still does most of the killing on the battlefield. Can't kill a tank? hide from it!!! (or jihad lav it, your choice)
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:30:00
|
1099. 1.7 . The Con and the Pro, IMO. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: KING, how about thus idea. Reduce the raw HP of vehicles, but boost hardener effectiveness so that us vehicles end up with the same ehp we have now while our hardeners are on? This would let us b...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 01:28:00
|
1100. 1.7 . The Con and the Pro, IMO. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: In all seriousness, light weapons shouldn't threaten a heavy vehicle save in numbers. The HAV speed, however... That needs to be fixed. Badly. TWICH THIS : ( -.- ) ..I.. I'm still laugh...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 00:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |