| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2601. Aim Assist = No more Strafe Dancing (Neo Matrix Dodging) = using more cover - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This isn't a cover game. There is not enough cover, and thereis not enough large cover, and we have too much health that regenerates too fast.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 06:45:00
|
2602. If you remove the aim assist!! Than Dust is Doomed for oblivion! - in General Discussions [original thread]
sammus420 wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: So you are saying give KBM users an obvious edge over the typical DS3 user because you aren't bothered by KBM guys? I don't have a problem with them. Balancing KBM and controllers is a whole seporate is...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 06:36:00
|
2603. If you remove the aim assist!! Than Dust is Doomed for oblivion! - in General Discussions [original thread]
sammus420 wrote: burning powers wrote: sammus420 wrote: I'm a dedicated DS3 user, and I say removed aim assist. Gun battles should be determined by skill, not by a computer. thats totally bogus. a dedicated DS3 users wouldnt even say th...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 05:50:00
|
2604. If you remove the aim assist!! Than Dust is Doomed for oblivion! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: COD does just this and has ruined a genre of gaming. I agree that COD soiled gaming a lot and I hate them for it, but not everything they do is wrong.Their games are very balanced for instance. The only real game breaking ...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 05:42:00
|
2605. people who complain about aim assist is clearly stupid or a masshole - in General Discussions [original thread]
If aim assist is banished KBM will be FoFE (flavor of forever). It needs to be reduced I think, but not gotten rid of.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 05:34:00
|
2606. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: The current system which isn't even fixed yet won't do. We need to change it immediately? You could at least give them some time until the current system works as intended before you start a change vote. Fix will be out in...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 04:15:00
|
2607. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You guys need to like the option you think is best. I'm not counting votes unless they are in "like" form so I can count them easily, also if anyone votes for more than one option, their votes are forfeit.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 03:44:00
|
2608. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Maybe increased payouts for higher tiered matches would incentivise using prototype gear? In theory, that's what Faction Warfare is for. When PC produces something EVE players really want, there will be ple...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 03:39:00
|
2609. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: 4. But weighted significantly on average rank per match. If you're consistently finnishing in the top of your matches then you will play harder opponents; if you're consistently getting your ass kicked you will play easier peopl...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 03:02:00
|
2610. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ugh. Of course some 10 year old voted for all of them, skewing the results. CCP, if you read this, please add a Poll tool for the forums.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 02:12:00
|
2611. WHY - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
640k wrote: SPUDD GUNN wrote: Why has the game just gone to crap after this new update?, i like to play domination.... but no its now random between the 3 choices, its crap, i waited over 3 mins every time to get landed with a ****** ambush ...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 01:04:00
|
2612. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Virgil Walker wrote: Frankly I'd like option 2. While having a match based on equip might seem good, it basically negates any reason to advance in gear. If you're paired in SP then you have a wider variety of play styles to go up against. May...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:36:00
|
2613. **** these developers. im uninstalling. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
See you tomorrow.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:31:00
|
2614. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reserved.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:18:00
|
2615. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reserved.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:17:00
|
2616. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reserved.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:17:00
|
2617. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reserved.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:16:00
|
2618. [VOTE] Matchmaking system solution. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.04 00:15:00
|
2619. request: remove matchmaking - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Game types. 1. MLT only: Current payout x0.75 2. MLT,STD only: Current Payout x1.00 3. MLT,STD,ADV only: Current Payout x1.33 4. No Restrictions: Current Payout x1.66 SP gain would be the same across the board, to disincentivize AFKers.
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.03 23:33:00
|
2620. request: remove matchmaking - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seymor Krelborn wrote: CLONE117 wrote: then the militia player can jump into the std area.. the way the restriction is set would have a few cons but dont all things have pros and cons?.. and im sure that adv armor repper can be swaped out ...
- by Fizzer94 - at 2013.09.03 23:22:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |