| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
561. How IMHO swarm launchers should behave - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eris Ernaga wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Swarms are going to be lame against tanks. Low damage, tanks will run away fast, bla bla bla. Ok then, how about dropships? Hmm... Damage is low, sounds like they're area denial... But wait. Swarms can't r...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.22 01:41:00
|
562. How IMHO swarm launchers should behave - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: All I know iI that I am speccing out of swarms the second I can. Add another weapon to the useless pile. A pile that includes: -Breach AR -Burst AR -Breach Flaylock -Assault Swarm Launcher -Small Rail Turret -AV mines...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.22 01:40:00
|
563. Idea: Vehicle as Ammo Supliers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Not another clone! But how would this work for Shield Tanks? If it takes away Armor, Shield tankers would need a Supply Depot after resupplying anyway. Why? They could just get out and use a good ol-¦ rep tool to heal them...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.22 01:35:00
|
564. 'Reads Pilot Suit description' - in General Discussions [original thread]
My guess: Mlt Light Fram Module Slots Secondary Weapon 2 equipment Slots litlle PG/cpu I guess, that the ammount of equipment Slots and PG/Cpu are going to be the only difference between each tier My Guess: 0 Equiment at STD 1 " " ADV 2 " " PRO
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 21:42:00
|
565. to those saying that small missile and python are op - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panoscape wrote: They're bringing back small missiles from chrome, but nerfed due to missile cartridge count and range. It's going to be so much fun again until the missiles run out. We got our splash back! I never had a problem with aiming. ...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 21:39:00
|
566. to those saying that small missile and python are op - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Who has been making these false truths? They lie! Dunno
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 21:38:00
|
567. is the Python / Incubus a standard dropship? Are Assaults just variations of st... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: EternalRMG wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Does this imply we will eventually see proto vehicles, capable of fitting the PG reqs from complex vehicle mods? You can fit all pro modules on the incubus Not all variatio...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 21:36:00
|
568. to those saying that small missile and python are op - in General Discussions [original thread]
You dont know if they r going to be accurate like the accelerade turrrets if they have the accuracy of normal missile turrets it will be really balanced
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 21:03:00
|
569. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
medomai grey wrote: Thanatus Sleep wrote: LMFAO you people going crazy over 4 BPO Yep. Because this issue could extend to other BPOs in the future. And...? Get over it guys the only bpos that we are going to keep are those that could ne...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 04:47:00
|
570. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kahn Zo wrote: Good luck to you OP, you got some nads. Defiant. Need another moist, chilled towelette to wipe the brow CCP? Another bag of popcorn please. Here good sir *give popcorn* POPCORN TAKE YOUR POPCORN FRESH MADE POPCORN 10ISK THE P...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 04:42:00
|
571. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: to be fair though in OP's defense. CCP have many notices which state the BPO is a Permanent Item, without an asterix at the side stating they could be removed. so really on all their promotional items...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 04:25:00
|
572. the reason BPOs are being removed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: PLAYER MARKET whats the point of it if you have infinite everything paying real money should only get you boosters/cosmetic/BPCs CCP hasnt even started developing the player market yet. Stop fant...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 04:13:00
|
573. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: trooper7041 wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Disturbingly Bored wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: EULA does NOT exempt Sony, CCP, or any other company from UK and EU law, especially when said company advertises an item ...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 04:10:00
|
574. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
*grabs popcorn*
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 03:25:00
|
575. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: Marston VC wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I've sent a complaint to the Office of Fair Trading (UK equivalent of America's national consumer rights government body) regarding the removal of in-game content (vehicle BPO)...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 03:12:00
|
576. Im already seeking legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Marston VC wrote: Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote: I've sent a complaint to the Office of Fair Trading (UK equivalent of America's national consumer rights government body) regarding the removal of in-game content (vehicle BPO) that I have purchased fr...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 03:09:00
|
577. is the Python / Incubus a standard dropship? Are Assaults just variations of st... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: Does this imply we will eventually see proto vehicles, capable of fitting the PG reqs from complex vehicle mods? You can fit all pro modules on the incubus
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.21 00:38:00
|
578. Agree / disagree: "high TTK should be one of the things that sets Dust apar... - in General Discussions [original thread]
yes
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.20 23:57:00
|
579. Assault dropships are going to be lolzworthy? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Goric Rumis wrote: I think we'll have to wait and find out on this one. I'm not worried about swarm launchers hitting them--swarms are allowed to be irrelevant past 175m. You can scare dropships away from nearer engagements, or keep it from ter...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.20 22:01:00
|
580. Assault dropships are going to be lolzworthy? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: EternalRMG wrote: Borne Velvalor wrote: EternalRMG wrote: Cat Merc wrote: So uhh... Swarms are now at 175m (as opposed to 400m), which is where the old rendering distance was. Now that's rendering distance is f...
- by EternalRMG - at 2013.11.20 22:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |