| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Deployed equipment should be destroyed if not equipped to current su... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
One solution (which I advocate always in such topics) would be to add a bandwidth parameter to suits. So for example a logi suit would have 100 bandwidth units, scout suits would have less and other suits would have close to 0. Then you can make ...
- by DeeJay One - at 2014.04.27 13:47:00
|
2. URGENT!!! Medium Frames Broken=DUST broken - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Come on, the numbers were all there before the respec arrived - there were tons of threads, especially regarding the Minmatar logi. Like they say ignorantia juris non excusat.
- by DeeJay One - at 2014.04.06 17:14:00
|
3. Important HUD stuff for CCP Saberwing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: **** lots of stuff **** Without doing any radical shift in layout, or getting into immersion stuff like HUD-wobble (which should have never been removed), this is what I believe is important for improving the HUD. ...
- by DeeJay One - at 2014.02.26 16:47:00
|
4. Announcement:Feedback Request: Weapon Stats and Ranges! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dexter307 wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: I'm kind of curious as to why the Bolt Pistol is full auto... Me aswell, why would a pistol that shoots at 150 rpm be full auto? Where did you get 150 RPM from? With the base stats you can shoot 24 r...
- by DeeJay One - at 2014.01.18 09:43:00
|
5. Orbital Targeting Glitch for pilots - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Middas Betancore wrote: As an orbital strike pilot on eve, when a strike is being requested it is not always showing the correct name for the squad leader requesting the strike. It will show names of people who aren't even in the bbattle, obvio...
- by DeeJay One - at 2014.01.05 15:16:00
|
6. Nerfing the swarm launcher / wheres the fairness? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Timothy Reaper wrote: I'd be okay with either the range or the damage returned to pre 1.7 stats. Nerfing both at the same time as buffing vehicles just seems like overkill. Nah, just a slight buff to one of them would be OK, pre 1.7 levels wo...
- by DeeJay One - at 2014.01.02 10:17:00
|
7. Vehicle Locking - 1.7 locking is horrible, why not this? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ares 514 wrote: I am well aware that you said this is a temporary solution. I am saying that IMO sometime in the future is unacceptable as this is a CORE issue that drives a ton of us nuts! Try playing some and constantly having your ride ...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.12.06 18:34:00
|
8. Uplink spam. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
abarkrishna wrote: Having 60 drop uplinks in one area is not a legitimate tactic. This game has come down to whoever gets the most uplinks fastest wins. With 60 uplinks in an area it is Impossible to kill them all quick enough before some A5s h...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.12.06 18:30:00
|
9. [Request] Equipment bandwidth proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Draco Cerberus wrote: So then we wouldn't have heavies spawning in scout suits to run links forward for spawn ins with their fat suits? I disagree about this being a good rework. Skill Flux, in PC you can take friendly and enemy links out all a...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.12.06 17:31:00
|
10. [Request] Equipment bandwidth proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reav Hannari wrote: I suggest the bandwidth be by character though so that blue spammers don't grief by hogging it all. One character shouldn't be able to deploy more than what one 4-slot logistics can at max skill with one suit. Ah, yes tha...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.12.06 13:44:00
|
11. [Request] Equipment bandwidth proposal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
(continued in the proper forum from https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1570391 ) Equipment like hives, re's and uplink should have a bandwidth requirement just like EVE drones have. The total amount of equipment on the field wo...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.12.06 13:23:00
|
12. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: There needs to be a way for an EVE player to be able to know what region > system > planet > district their allied mercs are fighting in for FW (good for PC also) Should either be a chat channel function...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.10.19 08:04:00
|
13. Minimap Improvements - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RedRebelCork wrote: Shadow Panther1 wrote: This is slightly off topic but since we are talking about maps, I would like it if we could see the map we would be playing on while waiting for deployment in the War Barge. I was thinking that the ...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.07.29 15:33:00
|
14. Minimap Improvements - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Remember the times when the minimap had an actual map? (the same as in the spawn screen)
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.07.29 15:31:00
|
15. A series of radical thoughts : Making Installations matter - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 for most ;) As for EVE connection I'd like to see some more information from CCP with regard to item locations (AFAIR currently all items are stored in a players home station) Dropping installations from orbit would be an awesome idea and bef...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.07.27 09:20:00
|
16. Request: Ability to fit unskilled items for testing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
loumanchew wrote: I think this is a major issue because it prevents players from trying out top gear and see what fits are achievable without spending the SP. For instance I skilled into scout only to realise that even with proto suit I could n...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.06.27 06:10:00
|
17. Gathering your feedback, planetary conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doyle Reese wrote: the entire thread? Because I have made some updates to my post a week ago that was located way earlier. That's not what the edit button is for ;)
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.06.21 05:53:00
|
18. Gathering your feedback, planetary conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: Barracks: +1%/hour SP gain, per barracks district held I'm all for districts giving bonuses to corp members except this. This would give corps that can hold sov even more SP gap between corps that want to join the f...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.06.15 09:01:00
|
19. Gathering your feedback, planetary conquest - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: Allow Eve-side ownership of districts in addition to Dust ownership.
IMHO this would lead to all district being held/paid for by the current EVE alliances with nothing for mercenaries to pick up, but that's not the p...
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.06.12 17:12:00
|
20. Sticky:[Dev post] Corporation Roles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Squad Member role seems unnecessary, just keep track who was in the battle and wasn't booted by a SL, so he can rejoin the battle after an accidental disconnection.
- by DeeJay One - at 2013.06.06 17:52:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |