| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1061. CALDARI SENTINEL IS DEAD. - in General Discussions [original thread]
S-PANZA wrote: That's the trade off, in the 1-4 seconds you have to get into cover, I rep 20-120 ehp. After that, you can rep up to 86 ehp a second. So at 5 seconds in, you have 86 ehp and 150. 6 seconds you have 172 and I have 180 At 7 s...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.26 02:57:00
|
1062. CALDARI SENTINEL IS DEAD. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack 3enimble wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: JRleo jr wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Uhhhhhh, last I checked that wasn't final. Besides, you can still regain tank. Gallente is going to be forced to only 1 rep :( You armor tankers can: Have over...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.26 02:36:00
|
1063. CALDARI SENTINEL IS DEAD. - in General Discussions [original thread]
JRleo jr wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Uhhhhhh, last I checked that wasn't final. Besides, you can still regain tank. Gallente is going to be forced to only 1 rep :( You armor tankers can: Have over 750 armor AND 450-ish shields, and 30 reps p...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.26 02:10:00
|
1064. CALDARI SENTINEL IS DEAD. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Uhhhhhh, last I checked that wasn't final. Besides, you can still regain tank. Gallente is going to be forced to only 1 rep :(
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 20:29:00
|
1065. Aeon's Statement - in General Discussions [original thread]
I voted for you.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 20:02:00
|
1066. can heavies stop bitching please - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Eh, I want to see this in action. On paper is one thing, on the battlefield its entirely something else. A prototype sentinel should be able to be all prototype. Again, more unnecessary penalizing. A...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 19:53:00
|
1067. All That Was Lost In Uprising 1.7... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I seriously don't know why they didn't try tweaking AV before they decided to change the vehicle balance. Swarms needed to keep their dmg but lose the range. And the FG needed to have its DPS lowered. Either lower AV nades down to 2 or adjust th...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 03:30:00
|
1068. The most Gallente fit ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Only problem with pure Gallente fits is that they cant punish the filthy dual tankers taking up our sweet armor, yet condemn us for using one shield extender. http://www.protofits.com/fittings/index/0/5775 It's true, we ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 02:20:00
|
1069. The most Gallente fit ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: HYENAKILLER X wrote: True gal proto fit: Duvolle Smg 3x dmg mods M1 2x cmplx plates 2x cmplx prof damp You are welcome. Using a Minmatar weapon of Caldari Manufacture ....... failed. Not Gallentean at all! Not to ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 00:46:00
|
1070. The most Gallente fit ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
HYENAKILLER X wrote: True gal proto fit: Duvolle Smg 3x dmg mods M1 2x cmplx plates 2x cmplx prof damp You are welcome. Ya need a Ion pistol damn you!
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 00:30:00
|
1071. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: How about 5 sentinels and a scout in a squad? It is actually shocking to me that you support 24/7 360 scans for a whole squad. You haven't given one reason why this is a good mechanic. And you have...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.25 00:14:00
|
1072. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Counter what? My scout needs 2-3 damps and my assault is unable to hide. My heavy is the only thing I can use to push a point and even then all heavies know which direction I'm coming from and where I'm...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 23:49:00
|
1073. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Yo seriously man, be quiet. So are you only into Broken stuff? So what is actually broken about the direction arrows from tacnet??...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 23:36:00
|
1074. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Yo seriously man, be quiet. So are you only into Broken stuff? So what is actually broken about the direction arrows from tacnet??? So you're into witch hunts? I'm not parti...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 23:15:00
|
1075. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Yo seriously man, be quiet. So are you only into Broken stuff?
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 23:03:00
|
1076. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: CCP Rattati said that this would require a Client-Side update. I know he said a patch was needed for removing passive scans, but he never said removing the ball was impossible.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 22:04:00
|
1077. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: The arrow is the only counter to heavies. Without it, everyone would be chucked into a meat grinder every time a heavy pinged on the radar. Its fine as is. I'm not talking about the heavy arrow, I'm talking about the b...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 21:13:00
|
1078. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
RayRay James wrote: Arcturis Vanguard wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Since we can't get rid of shared passive scanning, how about if we just got rid of the arrow that shows which direction the target is moving? I don't see why not. When I'm ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 21:12:00
|
1079. The most Gallente fit ever - in General Discussions [original thread]
8 slots!?
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 21:09:00
|
1080. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soulja Ghostface wrote: People like you just can't leave **** alone can't you? What are you talking about? People have been asking for shared passive scans to be turned off for awhile now.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2014.07.24 19:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |