| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3721. Rename the AR to Plasma or Blaster Rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Krom Ganesh wrote: Don't really care. Why not just go with Plasma Blaster and make both camps happy? Why is there a limit to how many likes I can give someone?
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:42:00
|
3722. Rename the AR to Plasma or Blaster Rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Like here for Blaster Rifle.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:40:00
|
3723. Rename the AR to Plasma or Blaster Rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Like here for Plasma Rifle.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:39:00
|
3724. Rename the AR to Plasma or Blaster Rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think this needs to be seattled and voted on now before 1.7 Do you prefer it to be called the Plasma Rifle or Blaster rifle? Imma throw my vote for Blaster. You can vote by clicking stuff down below. Edit:2 for Blaster 1 for Plasma Blaster
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:38:00
|
3725. new specs for the PLASMA RIFLE? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Blaster rifle will be called the Blaster Rifle.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:33:00
|
3726. Armour tankers plight. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I suggested something similar with the reactive plates. It was not well received. I support the plates, but disagree with the cardio/kincat mods.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:31:00
|
3727. Make it so the HMG cone doesn't tighten UNLESS you ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bump
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 15:00:00
|
3728. Caldari shields op??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: These forums are always astonishing, just because armor got a buff (and a needed one) does not mean shields were nerfed. Shield tanking is as viable as before the only difference is now that amo tankers catched up and harde...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 14:57:00
|
3729. 2 EU Codes for sale! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thanks for the code. Can't wait to show off the shotgun!
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 01:39:00
|
3730. Active scanners are balanced, In game content isn't - in General Discussions [original thread]
Problem is, any suit can use them. If it was scout only they would be much more balanced.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.15 00:24:00
|
3731. Make it so the HMG cone doesn't tighten UNLESS you ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
HowDidThatTaste wrote: The original idea is to have a larger cone as you start up the HMG and the longer you fire the more condensed and tighter the spread allowing for further distance shooting. As seen by the video what we already have is th...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 23:40:00
|
3732. Make it so the HMG cone doesn't tighten UNLESS you ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Actually where it tightens to now is probably fine, just only apply it while crouching. And it does need more optimal to give it worth. Currently only the Freedom Assault HMG gives any kind of decent result, and it needs...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 23:03:00
|
3733. Make it so the HMG cone doesn't tighten UNLESS you ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Just make it tighten to a ridiculous degree when crouching, and give it a more impressive optimal. That gives you CQC spread, and a crouching "siege mode" for longer range combat. It still isn't gonna beat laser rifles ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 22:43:00
|
3734. Make it so the HMG cone doesn't tighten UNLESS you ADS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also make the gun spin up when the ADS button is pressed. This way the HMG should be able to do proper spread dmg at close range and still be able to tighten its cone for further range engagements. Or introduce a none tightening HMG. Personally...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 22:35:00
|
3735. Undeniable proof that the HMG is bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vexen Arc wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Vexen Arc wrote: I've been running a GEK on a standard heavy suit for a while now. The difference is absurdly skewed in the GEK's favor. There is currently no reason to fit an HMG on a heavy dropsuit. ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 22:26:00
|
3736. Undeniable proof that the HMG is bad. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vexen Arc wrote: I've been running a GEK on a standard heavy suit for a while now. The difference is absurdly skewed in the GEK's favor. There is currently no reason to fit an HMG on a heavy dropsuit. What about AR heavy vs HMG heavy? Who w...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 22:07:00
|
3737. Dat Rubicon - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dat Rubicon
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 22:00:00
|
3738. So, The scrambler rifle has recoil. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: The coolant gets released as soon as the weapon fires, and to keep up with your fire rate it fires that coolant super quickly, making your weapon go wild when you fire at a high speed. VoV This sounds right, but I'd like to ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 21:54:00
|
3739. will we see more officer weapons in 1.7? - in General Discussions [original thread]
OSGR Valdez wrote: Like an officer flaylock? I already know how they can do it. Make it a pre-nerf version. and BAM you got an officer flaylock XD Welp, you just won the internet.
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 18:13:00
|
3740. DPS comparision between AR, Combat rifle and Rail Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
I said it before and I'll say it again "DPS is the ugliest word in Dust" And before you say anything I know it's technically 3 words. There are more factors at work here. If it were raw numbers then I would never get a kill using STD gear and I ...
- by Cody Sietz - at 2013.11.14 17:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |