| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1141. @DEVS How Will Range Amps Work With Concentric Circles Of Precision? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: It's not that hard. Correct. The math is a cinch. My question refers to implementation. Do amps affect all concentric circles, or just the outer ring? I just found this: * Range Amplifiers now add 5%/10%/15% range per ...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 20:39:00
|
1142. Scan Range Effectively Halved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Daddrobit wrote: ... the only thing these suits are gonna pick up are mediums and heavys, scouts will continue to require other scouts and focused scanners to see. That's the big problem. Scout vs scout. A precision tanked scout will now ha...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 20:33:00
|
1143. Scan Range Effectively Halved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: A scout may have to fit one range amp and precision enhancer to have omnipotent passive EWAR scans?! Wha-NO! The scout-gods will have nothing of this nonsense! Sorry, not sorry. Always such a sarcastic commenter who appa...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 19:27:00
|
1144. @DEVS How Will Range Amps Work With Concentric Circles Of Precision? - in General Discussions [original thread]
After 1.10, Will range amps extend the radius of each close/medium/far precision level, or will range amps merely extend the radius of the far precision ring? Please provide an example. Question Source: http://dust514.com/news/blog/2014/12/upri...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 19:14:00
|
1145. Scan Range Effectively Halved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Duke Noobiam wrote: Scouts who want to rule ewar will have to use precision enhancers now instead of stacking shield extenders. This is aligned with the goal of making scouts play as actual scouts rather than assault suits. Agreed, I have pl...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 18:42:00
|
1146. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
DDx77 wrote: Imo it would be better when switching suits to have only the equipment that doesn't fall in with that suits BW be destroyed, not a complete wipe of equipment (Unless I'm not understanding BW correctly) Equipment will only disa...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 18:29:00
|
1147. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: please stop repeating this nonsense about how uplinks are always camped, its a rare occasion if that. it is of minor consequence. every one of your arguments is a repeat of this argument which rarely affects anyone. besides e...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 17:22:00
|
1148. How many lives do you have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
5600
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 15:41:00
|
1149. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: i have been killed far more times jumping off buildings with zero situation awareness of what's waiting below than i ever have spawning in on a ground uplink. If you want to prevent zero situational awareneess, look around...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 13:24:00
|
1150. Scan Range Effectively Halved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Varoth Drac wrote: It's not a 50% range nerf to scouts it's at 30% precision nerf to scans over half range. Stated in the OP in not so many words. Varoth Drac wrote: Yes it's a scout nerf, but not as bad as halving range. What could onc...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 13:15:00
|
1151. About those mini flux OBs.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: ... Only now the uplink spammers are getting nerfed so I'm predicting WP production overall to be WAY down. Have you read the improvements to revive bonuses and guardian bonuses around objectives? Logi WP production wil...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 06:50:00
|
1152. Scan Range Effectively Halved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Clone D wrote: Joel II X wrote: I know. They're removing the scouting from scouts, didn't you know? I guess Ratatti plays a logi. He plays as a Gallente Assault. While I did not know that, I was sarcastically implyin...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 06:43:00
|
1153. Argument: TACNET Data <= 10 m Doesn't Do Much Good - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: The mini map is small to keep people from relying on it too much. Your eyes are your most valuable in put in this game. Use them. I rely on my eyes. If TACNET weren't meant to be looked at, then it wouldn't have been inc...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 06:37:00
|
1154. Argument: TACNET Data <= 10 m Doesn't Do Much Good - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Didn't you already make a thread about this? No
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 06:32:00
|
1155. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
CELESTA AUNGM wrote: Well,... not exactly. What I think is that the word "EFFECTIVELY" when it comes to deploying equipment, is tiffany-twisted difference in each player's overconfident mind. MANY of us think we have been "effectively" deploy...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 06:30:00
|
1156. Argument: TACNET Data <= 10 m Doesn't Do Much Good - in General Discussions [original thread]
Argument: TACNET data > 10 m is more valuable than TACNET data <= 10 m. Points: 1. The scan radar in ranges <= 10 m is so small that the data becomes aliased creating an ambigous scan that is hard to understand. Dots appear on top of ot...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 06:20:00
|
1157. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Clone D wrote: Meeko Fent wrote: Clone D wrote: Do you understand the idea of risk? Uplinks deployed on high structures, inaccessible to foot soldiers are at a low risk. Uplinks deployed on the ground are at a high ri...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 05:50:00
|
1158. Scan Range Effectively Halved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: I know. They're removing the scouting from scouts, didn't you know? I guess Ratatti plays a logi.
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 05:37:00
|
1159. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Clone D wrote: Do you understand the idea of risk? Uplinks deployed on high structures, inaccessible to foot soldiers are at a low risk. Uplinks deployed on the ground are at a high risk. Personally protect high-risk uplink...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 05:34:00
|
1160. why all the upset about bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Clone D wrote: Do you understand the idea of risk? Uplinks deployed on high structures, inaccessible to foot soldiers are at a low risk. Uplinks deployed on the ground are at a high risk. Personally protect high-risk upl...
- by Clone D - at 2014.12.07 05:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |