| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
721. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: While this is obviously a troll thread, all the tankers now have boners. Not a troll thread and Pacific rim was awesome. Also, I have a half chub- full boner would be this with one pilot
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 02:08:00
|
722. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: How would everyone feel? I'm talking built in omni sensors, 25000 EHP, 5000dps, built in 10x scope, 60kmh top speed with built in nitrous, and all for the cost of only 10mil for a fully fitted tan...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:44:00
|
723. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: I think too many threads have gotten to your head. this is also like shitting on iron wolf saber He can eat poop for all I care. I want a Capital Class Tiger Tank with 3 small proto turrets than can be individually operated...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:37:00
|
724. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: 25000 eHP and only 2 people? This better be a proto level tank... This would be a top of the line friggin officer tank. Hey Charlotte you mind if ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:36:00
|
725. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: How would everyone feel? I'm talking built in omni sensors, 25000 EHP, 5000dps, built in 10x scope, 60kmh top speed with built in nitrous, and all for the cost of only 10mil for a fully fitted ta...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:35:00
|
726. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: 25000 eHP and only 2 people? This better be a proto level tank... This would be a top of the line friggin officer tank.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:30:00
|
727. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Charlotte come tank with us you mug. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote: CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:26:00
|
728. Request to remove Manus peak, alter it or allow us to choose what map to play - in General Discussions [original thread]
I like Manus Peak but being able to cjoose maps would be nice
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:22:00
|
729. Tanks; 2 pilots; mega buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
How would everyone feel? I'm talking built in omni sensors, 25000 EHP, 5000dps, built in 10x scope, 60kmh top speed with built in nitrous, and all for the cost of only 10mil for a fully fitted tank.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:18:00
|
730. For all you Ass hole tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
If tanks get a super buff in exchange for needing a gunner and a driver, then I, personally, will snag up every single good tanker and make my own damn corp so we can still make ARs cry. I'll call it Honey Badger and it will be OP as ****.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:14:00
|
731. tanks are not supposed to be a crutch. - in General Discussions [original thread]
If thos market were driven by supply and demand as in Eve, tanks would never sell for more than 450K full proto turrets and modules. That's more than a 75% price reduction because nobody will run tanks if they aren't ISK efficient. Also,ARs would ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 01:04:00
|
732. tanks are not supposed to be a crutch. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nemo Bluntz wrote: Nicholas Silverton wrote: Just because you put 10+ mil sp into tanks and each one costs 1+mil isk, doesn't mean you should be invincible and go 40-0 every match. I do understand that 1+mil isk is alot to be throwing away s...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.25 00:35:00
|
733. Mango High Five - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Mango is the all powerful duke of the universe. Fear the Mango. Fear its Friends. /)(\
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 20:13:00
|
734. For all you Ass hole tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ted Nugget wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: So would the AR community like having under barrel SL attachment? and why did you plant that seed? lol For kicks.
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 20:09:00
|
735. For all you Ass hole tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
So would the AR community like having under barrel SL attachment?
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 20:01:00
|
736. I think I know how to get the problemof AV vs tanks across! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Coleman Gray wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You're a little late. MD QQ was so 2 weeks ago. What has it stopped? have MD's been nerfed? XD This week's hot topic is the swarm launcher change and what we want in 1.5
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 19:55:00
|
737. ccp reduce the effectiveness of tanks on infantry by 80-90%...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
We need MAVs to be there to wreck infantry, and the. HAVs to wreck MAVs, and gunships to wreck HAVs and jets to wreck gunships, and AA tanks to wreck jets.. Where does infantry come in- - - > as a small deterrent to overly brave vehicles. That ...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 19:54:00
|
738. Bible verses for dust~ - in General Discussions [original thread]
Htfu? I guess well have to..again
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 17:49:00
|
739. How to make tanks UP and OP at the same time through customizeable resistance fa... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want tanks to completely dominate open battlefields with incredible tank, firepower, and range; their purpose should be anti-infantry support, the main AV method, and destruction of hard targets. However, we should allow tanks a major weakness i...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 16:17:00
|
740. The proper way to balance tank vs AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want tanks to completely dominate open battlefields with incredible tank, firepower, and range; their purpose should be anti-infantry support, the main AV method, and destruction of hard targets. However, we should allow tanks a major weakness i...
- by Charlotte O'Dell - at 2013.08.24 16:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |