| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1521. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
deezy dabest wrote: Starlight Burner wrote: deezy dabest wrote: Kain Spero wrote: Also, match leaving is a problem present in ALL game modes today. There is a reason removing the team list has been discussed of a of couple occasions a...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.30 09:44:00
|
1522. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
System prioritizes squad sizes. That means it rapidly generates matches to dump 16 man squads. It then immediately dumps in the 9-15 groups, filling in gaps as needed. Then it drops the 8s. Then continues down. The more people who queue, the fa...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.30 08:00:00
|
1523. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piercing Serenity wrote: And I'm sure, even in EVE, it is possible to run FW solo. You might not have a noticeable impact, but you can do it without being curb stomped for trying. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Funniest statement I've s...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.29 21:16:00
|
1524. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's supposed to be a competitive mode. You enter solo? You enter underskilled? This is a simple thing: Entering FW or PC means you pays your money, you takes your chances. Neither are intended to be solo, nor new player queues. Pubs are there...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.29 16:24:00
|
1525. 4 man squads in Pubs? Then give us Team Deploy in FW!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: madness I categorically disagree with you on pretty much all of your objections. Pubs are the designated "safe space" with matchmaking and smaller squads. Faction Warfare and PC are supposed to be hard mode and "I get to ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.29 15:28:00
|
1526. Loyalty point payout question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Modified by faction boosters, which add 25% LP to each award. And you can run 3 of them for +75% LP boost
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.29 11:38:00
|
1527. If I were to use a KB/M... - in General Discussions [original thread]
No-one-ganks like-Gaston wrote: Is there anything specifically I should go for? Would any modern wireless work, or would I need to buy a keyboard and mouse specifically for use on the PS3? The correct procedure for using a Mouse is as follow...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 21:31:00
|
1528. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Is the vehicle tree a ROLE or a skill line for the use of what is intended to be a limited-use power-up? I'd prefer a role. FFS learn to read or stop trying to read my mind because you suc...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 17:54:00
|
1529. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: This isn't a balance thread. If you wanna complain about balancing... Go make another thread. You want them to be 1v1'd or to have no skill line..... I think that indicates a need for balancing.......
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 13:02:00
|
1530. Kaalakiota Assault C-1 BPO - in General Discussions [original thread]
Too easy. I'm out. NEXT!
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 03:24:00
|
1531. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
This isn't a balance thread. If you wanna complain about balancing... Go make another thread.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 03:20:00
|
1532. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: True Adamance wrote: I think it should be a legitimate role. So many people who have supported this game for so long have committed themselves to making vehicles their specialty in the same...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 02:09:00
|
1533. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I think it should be a legitimate role. So many people who have supported this game for so long have committed themselves to making vehicles their specialty in the same way others have infantry roles, you yourself Breaking ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.28 01:42:00
|
1534. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm in favor of dumping the vehicle cap personally. If a team wants to play tank division? Fine by me. It's .y understanding that the vehicle cap is because of memory issues anyway. I could absolutely be wrong, but as the only other explanation ...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 19:40:00
|
1535. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: If you can't solo a tank with AV that is your own damn fault for being a scrub. 3 lai dais and an unbonused PLC round will annihilate all but a pure tank, crap turret gv.0. In a jumping scout suit that only blasters...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 17:32:00
|
1536. DON'T FIX LETHE - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cloak Dog wrote: It looks like a Gallente version of the Kador and I like that. Dun make it red thats boring. No. I want my deadpool skin as promised
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 17:29:00
|
1537. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
You're still missing the point Doc: Is the pilot tree a ROLE that is intended to be able to use consistently as the role of scout might be used? Or is it a skillset for a series of in-game power-ups that were never intended to be financially via...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 17:28:00
|
1538. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The point. You all missed it. This is not a balance thread. Thank you, drive through.
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 16:01:00
|
1539. Unannounced UE4 Project? Hope? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kevall Longstride wrote: Ok. Nemesis runs on UE4. As to it taking away time from x project, slowing y project and just buggering up z project altogether I will say this once again so apologies to those who've heard this before. At Fanfest...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 10:15:00
|
1540. Requesting a clarification on vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The vehicle debate has raged on forever, but if anyone has asked this question, it's been a very long time. Is the use of vehicles supposed to be a role in the game, one intended to be utilized as a primary means of interaction, or are vehicles i...
- by Breakin Stuff - at 2015.06.27 08:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |