| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
1
   |
Posted - 2015.06.28 03:16:00 -
[31] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:
Risk/Rewards needs to be balanced, and having a overly high cost is not a reason to make something over perform.
So you agree to the elimination of Proto suits and gear?
http://youtu.be/dtXupQg77SU
Dust to Dust
Remember the dream you had before the day you were born.
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
9
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 03:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
This isn't a balance thread.
If you wanna complain about balancing...
Go make another thread.
WoW has taught me that Purple means Legendary. This means Quafe suits are the optimal loadout for killing all of you.
|
DUST Fiend
17
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 03:29:00 -
[33] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:This isn't a balance thread.
If you wanna complain about balancing...
Go make another thread.
You want them to be 1v1'd or to have no skill line.....
I think that indicates a need for balancing..... |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
9
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 13:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:This isn't a balance thread.
If you wanna complain about balancing...
Go make another thread. You want them to be 1v1'd or to have no skill line..... I think that indicates a need for balancing.....
No skill line..
That was a question of why, and how, not a request. Purge some bitter out of your system and don't try to Infer things I don't directly say.
The question is:
Is the vehicle tree a ROLE or a skill line for the use of what is intended to be a limited-use power-up?
I'd prefer a role.
FFS learn to read or stop trying to read my mind because you suck at it.
WoW has taught me that Purple means Legendary. This means Quafe suits are the optimal loadout for killing all of you.
|
The Attorney General
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 13:49:00 -
[35] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:
Is the vehicle tree a ROLE or a skill line for the use of what is intended to be a limited-use power-up?
I'd prefer a role.
FFS learn to read or stop trying to read my mind because you suck at it.
This is what YOU don't get.
Some of us answered that, although not in a special ed format like I am about to.
Now sit down and take your helmet off so you can hear me.
Stop looking out the window. Focus.
Vehicles are already a role.
The 1 to 1 parity is already real, so vehicles are already the most expensive role on the field.
Why am I posting in a stealth nerf vehicles thread, this is pointless.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
9
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 17:54:00 -
[36] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:
Is the vehicle tree a ROLE or a skill line for the use of what is intended to be a limited-use power-up?
I'd prefer a role.
FFS learn to read or stop trying to read my mind because you suck at it.
This is what YOU don't get. Some of us answered that, although not in a special ed format like I am about to. Now sit down and take your helmet off so you can hear me. Stop looking out the window. Focus. Vehicles are already a role. The 1 to 1 parity is already real, so vehicles are already the most expensive role on the field. Why am I posting in a stealth nerf vehicles thread, this is pointless.
You assert what you say, and yet the evidence points to a much different conclusion than you assert, feel free to bugger off, because I will not stop talking no matter how much you and all your buddies try to tell me to.
So quit trying to talk to me like I'm an idiot, because I'm asking a question, and you're superimposing your balance ideas as the answer, which can ONLY be correctly answered...
By a dev.
This is a speculation post so take your high horse and please trot it off the nearest cliff.
I do not need you to instruct me on matters of game balance, which are very clearly out of whack, despite your assertion to the contrary. And your ideas of balance may not jive with everyone else. So do take your OPINIONS and stick em where the sun don't shine unless you intend to present your ideas in a manner that doesn't reek of "Shut up you idiot"
WoW has taught me that Purple means Legendary. This means Quafe suits are the optimal loadout for killing all of you.
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
501
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 19:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Yeah I don't know what else to say, question has been answered a bunch of times, not sure why it is still a point of interest for anybody short of AV wanting vehicles nerfed. Balance is the more important issue that needs work, which is why OP thinks thread is in tailspin.
Balance those involved in the roles and you balance the power ups.
If you want all vehicles to be 3 shot by every AV weapon, hardeners or not, then I would hope players that enjoy diversity speak up. |
The Attorney General
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 19:36:00 -
[38] - Quote
Evidence? What evidence? Please provide your evidence.
You don't want other people to point out your idiocy, don't air it on a forum.
You say balance is very clearly out of whack, but not how. Please explain how tanks are OP, I need a good laugh
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Doc DDD
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
501
|
Posted - 2015.06.28 19:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
I mean the whole point of Ratatti introducing 'Proto' HAVS and attempting to balance them was to 'give purpose to skilling into HAVS' .. to be interested in removing skill trees seems counter productive to Ratattis entire proposal.
What do you expect other than a blue post in your thread saying ' working as intended '?
Tailspin is due to community raising valid discussion points regarding real issue at hand. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |