| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1941. WP usage. All ideas welcomed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Scott Knight wrote: I would say give like 1 to 2 min. Countdown that an EMP is coming so dropships can safely land and tanks would have the option to recall before becoming sitting ducks. (No way to destroy them until after the EMP). Would ma...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 21:32:00
|
1942. WP usage. All ideas welcomed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nice, very nice!
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 21:18:00
|
1943. where's my $ - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Killed scouts in droves all month. Need that isk bro! Any estimate on when it will be recieved.
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 20:26:00
|
1944. [Feedback] PC is absolute trash. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 simply brilliant! Zibathy, your work here can not be denied! Even by the district locking cowards who like to believe their good at the game?! This would make the game WAY more interesting, open avenues for PVE, and make the game more than just...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 20:20:00
|
1945. nanohives shouldn't give grenades. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Solutions guys. Htfu isn't a viable solution to any problem?! Neither is "play better"?! Anything that we suggest must be able to be debated, and tossed around helping players deal with problems. Grenade spam is only effective against the "const...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 19:52:00
|
1946. WP usage. All ideas welcomed - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
How about requiring a set amount of wp's to call in more than one tank? The first one is free as with dropships and lav's, but after that it cost wp's. Wanna bring in more turrets? 500 wp's! Just a suggestion, but I think we need more of a use f...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 19:26:00
|
1947. This is legit...listen to me about ARTILLERY. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 something is better than nothing even if it's just autopilot.
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 19:12:00
|
1948. The merc quarter is feeling useless - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want to explore the ship! Go to the hanger to make vehicle modifications, to the armory for weapon checks, and to the engine rooms etc. All HAV pilots can bring their in-game characters to the HAV hangers, and so forth with dropship pilots. Corp...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 19:06:00
|
1949. I Now See the Light in the Dropship/Railgun imbalance - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Redline could be fixed by having it behind hills and whatnot. In order to see anything to shoot at, you must leave the redline. This makes you vulnerable to counterattack. Tanks need to be slower. Escape shouldn't be ea...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 18:44:00
|
1950. THE RAIL RIFLE IS NOT OP - STOP THE QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: @ Bradric Banewolf ''When I get lazy I grab a lvl one rail rifle, and just hipfire in cqc lol! You can say what you like, but you know were not lying lol! First time I used it it felt as if I was cheating! It's sooo easy!...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 18:11:00
|
1951. So When CCP Fixes Molden Heath... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Atiim wrote: Shouldn't they also remove the ISK generated from all of the exploits used, such as "district locking?" No, because it isn't an exploit. It's an obvious use of incredibly dumb game mechanics. I told...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 05:14:00
|
1952. When are you going to put us out of our misery CCP ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Tanks aren't even that big of a problem now as they used to be. I want what your smoking lol! In ambush we immediately break for building's so we don't have to go anti armor immediately. I take on tanks all the time, and...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 04:56:00
|
1953. THE RAIL RIFLE IS NOT OP - STOP THE QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm done lol! You got it bro lol! I gotta go to work lol! We all know wassup while you, on the other hand, need some glasses lmao!
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 04:44:00
|
1954. THE RAIL RIFLE IS NOT OP - STOP THE QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Exactly for example. 1 on 1 i havnt lost to a RR unless he starts shooting first because he saw me first (by at least 2-3 seconds of advantage) or attacks me from behind. My SCR will win 99% of those encounters if his in ...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 04:41:00
|
1955. THE RAIL RIFLE IS NOT OP - STOP THE QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
When I get lazy I grab a lvl one rail rifle, and just hipfire in cqc lol! You can say what you like, but you know were not lying lol! First time I used it it felt as if I was cheating! It's sooo easy! Calling me "butthurt" won't change that, and j...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.02.01 04:31:00
|
1956. THE RAIL RIFLE IS NOT OP - STOP THE QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
emtbraincase wrote: I'm VERY happy with my Duvolle or Ascr, I just refuted the reason most have said the RR isn't OP. Spool is ineffective because too many ways around it, meaning your excuse for its non-OP-ness has been shot down. If you can c...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.01.31 23:10:00
|
1957. THE RAIL RIFLE IS NOT OP - STOP THE QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
No need in arguing with these guys?! They want a prevalent "I win button" regardless to what you say or how much sense you make lol! They know it's OP, and they're happy about it. Same with the tank. I imagine once the game is actually decently ba...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.01.31 23:01:00
|
1958. New Starter Fits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.01.31 21:56:00
|
1959. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Tanks should stay as one man vehicles. But tanks should be about killing other vehicles. They should have to rely on small turrets to protect them from infantry. There should also be a LAV that let's you use the turret ...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.01.31 21:41:00
|
1960. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lynn Beck wrote: We still need a tank that can be operated solo. Just make it so you have Xhav's and Hav's. Xhav's have 40% extra HP, and use OP's idea. Also they have 4/3 slot layout. Hav's maintain their current speed, and operate decently ...
- by Bradric Banewolf - at 2014.01.31 21:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |