| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
81. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Just got done with a match with a HAV killing everyone. Me and one other guy was trying to destroy the HAV. I had it to half armor by myself...just never mind.
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 02:47:00
|
82. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: Agreed but I don't see the point in plasma cannon. Just use forge. much faster and more accurate. Unless plasma wants to start at 2500 it'll still be worthless for WTF damage against tanks. PLC is a 120/80% efficiency ...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 02:29:00
|
83. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Also, 300-350m is beyond it's rendering range, so I think it would only be fair to add an alarm system and give DSs flares once the swarms are beyond rendering distance. I agree on the PLC buff, but 1750HP doesn't really give a ...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 02:26:00
|
84. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Berserker007 wrote: Otavio Martins wrote: give us tankers proposition number 4 and we can talk. i bet we will be much more flexible after this gladly . Not because I wana be a masochist, but I think this will ...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 01:44:00
|
85. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Otavio Martins wrote: give us tankers proposition number 4 and we can talk. i bet we will be much more flexible after this gladly . Not because I wana be a masochist, but I think this will help the balance issue.
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 01:16:00
|
86. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: inb4 spkr and tankahiro LOLz , +1 for that. Though is good to see actual logical thinking so far; when they hit the thread all logical will go out the window
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 01:06:00
|
87. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Proto Vehicles? What, so like 30m ISK per Tank? no, figure if keep hulls as it (though think should go back to the 200k hull. Have adv hull be 350-500k ; and proto hulls be 500800k. Yes, they are costly, but hopefully ...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 01:03:00
|
88. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: My problem with vehicles is that no one tries. There will be four HAVs on the field and I will be the only one actually trying to kill them with AV. With an advanced PLC, prox mines and standard AV nades I can usually get...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.19 01:02:00
|
89. True Av'ers take on AV vs Vehicles Situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
ok, before the main area of the topic; give you some background so maybe what I say have some credibility. From the start of REPLICATION (that's May 2012), I have ran some form of proto AV (be sworms, FG w/ AV nades) from then through this build. ...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.18 23:58:00
|
90. CCP so whens the next Devs vs players match ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
how about when are the devs gana give us IMPs our dev match. Only been 2.5yrs since we earned it ... lolz
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.18 21:52:00
|
91. What does infantry want for vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd say your entire premise of your post is unwanted. You simply assume such of all Av'ers which is far from true; yet you are as radical in your beliefs as Speaker, meaning you are just as ignorant, even if you aren't a 3rd teir tanker like he is...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.16 17:49:00
|
92. Dust 514 Tournaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
ENDURO ETC wrote: Berserker007 wrote: ENDURO ETC wrote: Well, I'm hoping that CPP hosts the Tournaments. they did, it was an epic fail on their on with how it was ran, and how rewards were given Really? Damn, oh well I still want th...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.16 04:11:00
|
93. Dust 514 Tournaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
ENDURO ETC wrote: Well, I'm hoping that CPP hosts the Tournaments. they did, it was an epic fail on their on with how it was ran, and how rewards were given
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.16 03:58:00
|
94. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: id say your fitting was pretty spot on; the pg reduction is what will really help out extenders use (along with a high buffer extender in my opinion...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 22:34:00
|
95. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: id say your fitting was pretty spot on; the pg reduction is what will really help out extenders use (along with a high buffer extender in my opinion) Thanks! np at all. Like said, this is imp...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 22:32:00
|
96. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Do you agree with the numbers that i put in my OP? 44 hp at STd, 58 at ADV, and 72 at PRO, with a 4 pg reduction at PRO? I would say no. Reason for it, as the increas...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 22:15:00
|
97. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Do you agree with the numbers that i put in my OP? 44 hp at STd, 58 at ADV, and 72 at PRO, with a 4 pg reduction at PRO? I would say no. Reason for it, as the increase is to minimal to make a difference. It is only ...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 21:56:00
|
98. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: here is the problem I see w/ shield vs armor. Since the introduction of the game, armor has received 2 addition types, along w/ a penalty reduction to the standard plates. Whereas shield have only s...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 21:37:00
|
99. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
here is the problem I see w/ shield vs armor. Since the introduction of the game, armor has received 2 addition types, along w/ a penalty reduction to the standard plates. Whereas shield have only seen a penalty invoked to them. Prior to the curr...
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 21:27:00
|
100. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
He is just upset that after all this time he is still a 3rd rate tanker
- by Berserker007 - at 2014.02.15 20:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |