| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
381. Why is there a flashbang on protofits? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
THUNDERGROOVE wrote: If you guys even knew half of it. With my work on my unofficial SDE,I have access to numbers in the client that aren't exported and types that aren't as well. There is so much stuff, it actually makes me sad how much cont...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.18 19:40:00
|
382. Normalization of Vehicle Module Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey, these are very good numbers, and I like your progression quite a bit. One other concern, that seems to have been brought up from Aeon on GD, is the issue of fitting on lower level tanks without max skills. Basically the issue boils down...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.18 19:02:00
|
383. my question is how did you find out about dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've been following news on DUST for almost as long as I've been playing EVE online. (Even though I didn't have a PS3 at the time) Around June after it got it's 'official' 5/14 'release' I managed to buy a PS3 on the cheap. Still love the game a...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 22:01:00
|
384. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
danie sous wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Well, actually, if there is some OP meta, like let's say Scrambler Rifles, being able to say "I want to be properly defended against that and sacrffice HP" is pretty cool. Why not throw some ideas out, t...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 21:55:00
|
385. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Alright I'll run some numbers later. I have some core concerns with the potential disparity between usefulness on lighter frames vs heavier frames. It's late so I may be fudging the math in my head, s...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 14:56:00
|
386. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fair enough, if that is the idea you want to go with then I can support that. I'd like to emphasize that I do like your idea, and generally support the majority of it. Most of these things are more nitpicks than a fundamental disagreement. My ...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 04:39:00
|
387. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Not really. A basic Armor Plate is 93.5 additional armor. I'd be hard pressed to put on a Basic (Adaptive) when that'd only shave off 35 DPS off of a Prototype ACR. You are correct, with plates you would roughly need ove...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 04:13:00
|
388. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Avallo Kantor wrote: As to my statements about the Adaptive mods being a calculateable best choice: I am comparing them to buffer mods (Such as shield extenders) As a rough example: 36.3 - HP from basic Shield Extende...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 03:32:00
|
389. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As to my statements about the Adaptive mods being a calculateable best choice: I am comparing them to buffer mods (Such as shield extenders) As a rough example: 36.3 - HP from basic Shield Extender with max skills 7.5% - Resists to all via the...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 03:27:00
|
390. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
You should take into account the values for explosive and laser damage with their opposite tank. In short: Adaptive Armor Plating (electromagnetic) and Shield Resistance Modules (Explosive) should be greatly reduced, i.e smaller than normal resi...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 03:10:00
|
391. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Avallo Kantor wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Here's my proposal. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p754JSaoUrvON5pV65fJAfyIcZPAccNMJDgFCO5tXqg/edit?usp=sharing I am not sure how I like the idea of having different...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 02:46:00
|
392. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Here's my proposal. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1p754JSaoUrvON5pV65fJAfyIcZPAccNMJDgFCO5tXqg/edit?usp=sharing I am not sure how I like the idea of having different % resists for each damage type, as it simply...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 02:25:00
|
393. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Avallo Kantor wrote: I'll add a google doc when I get out of work, but I decided to do a bit of numbers on my idea (basing CPU / PG on the % difference between tank extenders / hardeners) Proposal is based on ~120% CP...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.17 00:29:00
|
394. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'll add a google doc when I get out of work, but I decided to do a bit of numbers on my idea (basing CPU / PG on the % difference between tank extenders / hardeners) Proposal is based on ~120% CPU and ~53% PG of same level Extender / Plate: N...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 23:27:00
|
395. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Logi Bro wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Well, actually, if there is some OP meta, like let's say Scrambler Rifles, being able to say "I want to be properly defended against that and sacrffice HP" is pretty cool. Why not throw some ideas out, typ...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 17:46:00
|
396. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: You've a point. At least for now a flat bonus amount may be the way to go just to test the waters. So all Shield Amplifiers and Resistance plates will grant the same amount. That is an interesting idea, but the counterpoi...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 17:40:00
|
397. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: duster 35000 wrote: Avallo Kantor wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Well, actually, if there is some OP meta, like let's say Scrambler Rifles, being able to say "I want to be properly defended against that and sacrffice HP" is ...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 17:02:00
|
398. NPE: In Game Guide - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A good idea, but I'd state we already have a lot of this information available, just out of game. [Edit: post ate some of my text] So it wouldn't be the creation of new data so much is compiling existing ones in game.
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 15:07:00
|
399. CCP Rattati, Resistance Modules for Infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
dzizur wrote: we're inventing new ways of tanking and modules based around living longer... yeah, because there's so much diversity in infantry modules. EWAR - we got damps and precisions (dont get me started on range amps..) BIOTICS - running...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 15:04:00
|
400. NPE: In Game Guide - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Under the help section there should be a selection that leads to a small guidebook. This would be a text (and maybe pictures if you feel really fancy) with page scroll. (either use the bumpers like in after battle screen to move between pages, or ...
- by Avallo Kantor - at 2015.03.16 13:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |