| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. Community: Give us some planet names - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spheron I
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.28 04:05:00
|
62. Kill this before it reaches 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
As someone who does everything through the neocom I'm not personally bothered by this but I'm not sure how great it is as a feature when the chat window overlaps so badly with so many menus. CCP should probably keep in mind that the way we actual...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.28 00:47:00
|
63. PlansTM and an FW devblog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In regards to the changes that have been delayed from 1.5 to 1.6 Logibro said this. Nearly ten days ago. CCP Logibro, Posted: 2013.09.18 12:30 wrote: However, there is some good news. What this also means is that we'll be posting what we have ...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.27 10:54:00
|
64. PlansTM and an FW devblog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Big plans, huh? Haven't heard anything like that before. Sounds like a real game changer. It'd be a shame if all that talk just ended up being CCP digging half a hole and filling it back in again and then saying we shouldn't complain because they...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.26 11:32:00
|
65. opinions on the october events - in General Discussions [original thread]
They should just be giving out bonus ISK for wins. It's boring as hell but it's a lot better than what they've got planned.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.26 10:42:00
|
66. Announcement:Events: October Event Schedule! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Absolute Idiom II wrote: There's no 100 WP minimum for the match to qualify as a win/loss. Is this intended, or did you just forget? IMO it's pretty important to have it so that you don't get penalised for joining a match just before it ends, ...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.25 21:41:00
|
67. Please, please, please. Patch Notes, pleeeeeese. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro, Posted: 2013.09.18 12:30 wrote: However, there is some good news. What this also means is that we'll be posting what we have so far on the forums starting next week for you guys to give feedback before any of this stuff hits Tranqu...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.23 20:41:00
|
68. what if ps4 is good for dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Aqil Aegivan wrote: What would you know about running for CPM? I suspect he was referring to actually becoming one... this place appears to be the home of insufferable bastards (of course I seem to fit in here). Ye...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.22 06:58:00
|
69. what if ps4 is good for dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Crash Monster wrote: F*ck, remind me to never run for CPM. Don't run for CPM, you'll regret it. What would you know about running for CPM?
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.22 02:27:00
|
70. GoGo Sock's DevBlog! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: A week long delay for a DEV blog describing the month long delay for the initial contents of 1.5. DELAY 514 "Why can't you get anything done on time?" "Tell you in a minute."
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.20 19:34:00
|
71. Greetings, Conqueror of planets; I come bearing gifts from Doltan - in General Discussions [original thread]
*Dotlan
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.20 00:27:00
|
72. I dont get this event.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slen Kaleth wrote: Even now they seem to be trying to listen and clarify/fix things. None of which would be necessary if they had simply involved the community from the beginning. I am not excited by the fact that they are willing to fix wha...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.30 19:03:00
|
73. I dont get this event.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Another event designed without a hint of community input and another event I'll be avoiding by not logging into Dust for its duration.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.30 17:49:00
|
74. How many Manus Peak in this galaxy... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Due to military accords battlefields are terraformed into familiar forms prior to battle.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.26 12:34:00
|
75. IGÇÖm not satisfied with the patch 1.4. Are you? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well I'm already staying away from Dust for the duration of the latest event so it's hard to get exited about anything. Honestly, for me it's not the patch content that bothers me so much as the fact that unless we see a move towards better commun...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.26 10:45:00
|
76. Implications of Shared squad vision being OFF!! HELLS YEAH!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Why assume that this involves vehicles? Well when they say active scanner I assume they meant all active scanners. A vehicle scanner you have to switch on should fall in the active scanner category. I would have th...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.24 03:35:00
|
77. 1.4 No dropsuit changes? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oso Peresoso wrote: I would expect some changes in 1.5. Depends mostly on if they're ready to remake the suit bonuses, and on what the feedback from 1.4 is. This is complete speculation but I would not be shocked to see the pilot suit in 1.5.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.23 17:11:00
|
78. What happened to the SMG? - in General Discussions [original thread]
TunRa wrote: What happened to all of this ? Well the original plan was to keep telling us to stop complaining about them adding content while core mechanics were broken, they'd say stuff like "We have multiple teams" and "new dropsuits don'...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.23 16:59:00
|
79. Implications of Shared squad vision being OFF!! HELLS YEAH!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: Aqil Aegivan wrote: Oso Peresoso wrote: less reason for people to get in squads. Active scanner results are still shared. People will probably want to squad with one person in an LLAV with a scanner equipped. ...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.23 14:32:00
|
80. Implications of Shared squad vision being OFF!! HELLS YEAH!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oso Peresoso wrote: less reason for people to get in squads. Active scanner results are still shared. People will probably want to squad with one person in an LLAV with a scanner equipped.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.08.23 14:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |