I agree that the kick on the large blaster needs to be tweaked. You can only get a handful of shots off before the targeting reticule becomes worthless. I understand that this was done to prevent blaster tanks from running roughshod over infantry, but a minor change is needed. Perhaps the targeting reticule could be tied in with heat build-up? The hotter the barrel, the larger the reticule?

I'm still considering increasing the dispersion decay, which will make it easier and quicker to pulse bursts. I might also consider reducing the dispersion rate at the low end but increase it at the high end, again to help keep accuracy in small bursts.

Might also change the reticule again, would like to hear thoughts on whether you prefer the current one or the standard rifle one.

EDIT: Whoops, mean dispersion growth rate, not actual dispersion limits for second change being considered.

I'm still considering increasing the dispersion decay, which will make it easier and quicker to pulse bursts. I might also consider reducing the dispersion rate at the low end but increase it at the high end, again to help keep accuracy in small bursts.

Might also change the reticule again, would like to hear thoughts on whether you prefer the current one or the standard rifle one.

EDIT: Whoops, mean dispersion growth rate, not actual dispersion limits for second change being considered.

Agreeing that large blasters are now too wild
BUT
trust me as I say that we can't afford L Blasters to have too many accurate shots in a row - as it only takes those 2-3 headshots for infantry to go down. That pinpoint accuracy did let the tanks slaughter inf at ranges over 40m excessively (I did that too)