| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 |
121. To Rattati: small balancing on ScR. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: All Gucci wrote: yes I did , I clearly see what he is talking about.... are you here to cry about my ScR to or are you just dumb ? However this only refers the the number of units sold. It could also serve to represe...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.06 22:37:00
|
122. To Rattati: small balancing on ScR. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Greasepalms wrote: I actually misread your post, All Gucci, apologies. I was under the impression you were contesting Fizzer's proof to ScR usage, my bad. You Gucci bro it happens....now swear your allegiance to third rock!! jp
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.06 20:58:00
|
123. To Rattati: small balancing on ScR. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Greasepalms wrote: All Gucci wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: over 70% of the players I see are using it Not even remotely close to 70%. 7.025263% of the weapons used are Scrambler Rifles. This includes Assau...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.06 16:52:00
|
124. To Rattati: small balancing on ScR. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: over 70% of the players I see are using it Not even remotely close to 70%. 7.025263% of the weapons used are Scrambler Rifles. This includes Assault Scramblers. Exaggerate much? Piraten...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.06 13:35:00
|
125. DualTankAmarr2015 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Revert the change that were made about a year ago and return us to our dual tanking ways. Everyone feel free to approach with a counter argument and not just no because you wanna be a forum douche We were originally dual tank. (Sin against empr...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 18:36:00
|
126. Mass Drivers & Ammunition - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I would counter that the mass driver has much greater potential to cause damage than a CR. The CR has more kill potential than the MD, but the CR can only hit one target at a time. A MD can hit several. H...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 17:57:00
|
127. Mass Drivers & Ammunition - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: As many players know, Mass Drivers have a very limited ammunition total. While I'm fine with it not having as much ammo as other types of weapons, there is a problem with it having too little ammo as the amount of kills it can obt...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 17:36:00
|
128. Everyone I have found the right solution !!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: All Gucci wrote: After reading through the FotM threads I have found a proper fix to the Min dilemma ,A dual tank counter to the Min would make dust really interesting, It would make more sense to just make the amarr slot...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 17:34:00
|
129. Everyone I have found the right solution !!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sequal's Back wrote: Actually I don't think it's such a bad idea^^ That would make 1 shield/2 duals/1 armor tanker. Maybe it could counter the fact that most people are armor tanking^^ gal and amarr assault are almost the same suits, and they ...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 15:49:00
|
130. Why armor seems to be more prevalent on the battlefield.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: If you must know, however, I run the MinCom & Assault. But I will be sure to add your tears to my prized collection If you must know, I dont care soooo yea and you would get evaporated by my basic ScR head,body,weapon ,an...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 03:40:00
|
131. Why armor seems to be more prevalent on the battlefield.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: All Gucci wrote: Because you don't instantly know its weakness like my earlier example gal/amarr you know to pull out your project and rail weapons..../ Cal you know to bring out your laser/Hybrid weaponry Min/ you pull out you...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 03:01:00
|
132. Everyone I have found the right solution !!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
PLAYSTTION wrote: Amarr HP is high already, don't give them more we wouldn't be getting more hp bro we would just be splitting the hp we do have now 45-40% Sheild /55-60% armor while also gaining the shield regen delays and slots of the Min
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.04 00:44:00
|
133. Dust 514 will NEVER be balanced.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lady MDK wrote: Dust will never be balanced cus there are players that excel and those that suck and some in the middle.... and given the wide variety of player skills its had to balance. Yes you partially correct there is a steep learning cu...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 23:21:00
|
134. Dust 514 will NEVER be balanced.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Didnt you basically already make this thread? Shhhhh no I didnt
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 21:33:00
|
135. Dust 514 will NEVER be balanced.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As long as there is 1 Shield tanker/ 1 Dual tanker/ 2 Armor tankers, the meta will forever be armor and the weapon that will forever reign supreme is the CR.... CCP Its only logical to balance this!!!! To truly have a balanced game...and something...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 21:06:00
|
136. Why armor seems to be more prevalent on the battlefield.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Nope not returning to that age of heretical fittings. 15/15 Scr profile would help free us from stacking a second damage mod to finish armor. pair that with a 4/4 layout and lower shield regen and you could have some ex...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 20:33:00
|
137. Why armor seems to be more prevalent on the battlefield.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: All Gucci wrote: Orrrrrrrrrrrr make the Min purely shields so it would balance out the meta because they have the unfair advantage of surprise. I fail to see how being able to fit your suit the way you want it is an unfair ad...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 20:17:00
|
138. Why armor seems to be more prevalent on the battlefield.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Dude. The Amarr are armor tankers... Their very name is a play on the word "armor". Stop trying to make dual tanked Amarr happen. It won't. Ever. Amarr....Armor.....nope, dont see it In dust they were originally dual tan...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 19:24:00
|
139. Why armor seems to be more prevalent on the battlefield.. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1 Shield race / 1 Dual tanking/ 2 armor........................ make one of the armor users a dual tanker and you'll see the battle field balance out more...From the marketing data that I have seen 95% of side arms that were used were anti armor.....
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 19:07:00
|
140. Everyone I have found the right solution !!!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Your idea is terrible and should be forgotten. No its actually really good if you can think beyond the stack as much armor hp as possible bull you young amarr have been raised on...The meta is armor because there is cur...
- by All Gucci - at 2015.01.03 16:53:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |